Modelling the valuesphere and the ecosphere: Integrating the decision makers’ perspectives into LCA

• Adams, J. (1995): Risk. UCL Press, London

  Google Scholar 

• Ahbe, St.;Braunschweig, A.;Muller-Wenk, R. (1990): Methodik für ökobilanzen auf der Basis ökologischer Optimierung. Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 133, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL), Bern

  Google Scholar 

• Asselt van, M.;Rotmans J.;den Elzen, M.;Hilderink, H. (1995): Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Modelling; a Cultural Perspective-based Approach. GLOBO Report Series No.9, RIVM Report No. 461502009, Bilthoven

• Asselt van, M.B.A.;Beusen, A.H.W.;Hilderink, H.B.M. (1996a): Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment: A Social Scientific Perspective. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 1: 71–90

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Asselt van, M.B.A.;Rotmans, J. (1996b): Uncertainty in Perspective. Global Environmental Change 6 (2): 121–57

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ayres, R.U.;Somonis, U.E. (Eds.) (1994): Industrial metabolism: restructuring for sustainable development. United Nations University Press, Tokyo

  Google Scholar 

• Barnthouse, L.;Fava, J.;Humphreys, K.;Hunt, R. et al. (1997): Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: The State-of-the-Art. Report of the SETAC North American Workgroup on Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Pensacola

  Google Scholar 

• Beentjes, C.;Wrisberg, N.;Ywema, P.E. (1995): The Social Value of Life Cycle Assessment, financed by SPOLD Brussels, Draft

• Berg, M.;Scheringer, M. (1994): Problems in Environmental Risk Assessment and the Need for Proxy Measures. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 3 (8): 487–92

  Google Scholar 

• Brenot, J.;Bonnefous, S.;Marris, C. (1998): Testing the Cultural Theory of Risk in France. Risk Analysis, Vol. 18, No.6, 729–739

  Article  Google Scholar 

• BUWAL (1998): Methode der ökologischen Knappheit - ökofaktoren 1997. Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr.297, öBU/BUWAL, Bern

  Google Scholar 

• Douglas, M. (1982): Cultural Bias, in Douglas M. (ed.), In the Active Voice. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

  Google Scholar 

• Douglas, M.;Wildavsky, A. (1982): Risk and Culture; An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkley

• ExternE (1995): Externalities of Energy. European Commission EUR 16520 EN, Volume 1–6, Luxembourg

• Fischhoff, B.;Slovic, P.;Lichtenstein, S.;Read, S.;Combs, B. (1978): How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits. Policy Sciences 9:127–52

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Frischknecht, R.;Braunschweig, A.;Hofstetter, P.;Suter, P. (2000): Human Health Damages due to Ionising Radiation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment, to be published in Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2

• Goedkoop, M. (1995): The Eco-indicator 95. Final Report and Manual for Designers, Amersfoort

• Goedkoop, M.;Hofstetter P.;Müller-Wenk, R.;Spriensma, R. (1998): The Eco-Indicator’98 Explained. The International Journal on Life Cycle Assessment 6 (3) 352–360

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goedkoop, M.;Spriensma, R. (1999): The Eco-indicator’99, Adamage-oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. VROM, Den Haag

  Google Scholar 

• Guinée, J. (Ed.) (1999): Life Cycle Assessment in environmental policy. Update of LCA methodology Guide & Background documents of 1992 by Heijungs, R. et al., Draft version, http:// www.leidenuniv.nl/interfac/cml/lca2

• Hauschild, M.;Wenzel, M. (1998): Environmental assessment of products. Part 2, scientific background, Chapman & Hall, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Heijungs, R.;Guinée, J.B.;Huppes, G.;Lankreijer, R.M.;Udo de Haes, H.A.;Wegener Sleeswijk, A.;Ansems, A.M.M.;Eggels, P.G.;van Diun, R.;de Goede, H.P. (1992): Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products; Backgrounds & Guide. Leiden

• Hofstetter, P. (1999): Top — Down; Arguments for a Goal-Oriented Assessment Structure. Global LCA Village, http://www. ecomed.de/journals, ETH Zurich

  Google Scholar 

• Hofstetter, P.;Braunschweig, A.;Mettier, Th.;Mueller-Wenk, R.;Tietje, O. (2000): Dominance Analysis in the Mixing Triangle: Graphical Decision Support for Comparisons with LCA. Journal of Industrial Ecology (in press)

• Hofstetter, P. (1998): Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment; A structured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere, and valuesphere. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

  Google Scholar 

• Holling, C.S. (1977): Myths of Ecology and Energy, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Future Strategies for Energy Development. Oak Ridge pp.36–49

• Holling, C.S. (1986): The Resilience of Terrestrial Ecosystems: Local Surprise and Global Change, in Clark, W.C.; Munn, R.E. (Eds.), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• IFIAS (1974): Energy Analysis Workshop on Methodology and Conventions. International Federation of Institutes for Advanced Study. Guldsmedshyttan, Sweden

• ISO (1997): Environmenral Management — Life Cycle Assessment — Principles and Guidelines. EN ISO 14040, Brussels

• Jager, W.;van Asselt, M.B.A.;Rotmans, J.;Vlek, C.A.J.;Costerman Boodt, P. (1997): Consumer Behaviour; A Modelling Perspective in the Context of Integrated Assessment of Global Change. Globo Report Series No.17, RIVM Report No.461502017, Bilthoven

• Jungermann, H.;Slovic, P. (1993): Charakteristiken individueller Risikowahrnehmung. in Bayerische Rück (Hrsg.), Risiko ist ein Konstrukt. Knesebeck Verlag, 89–107

• Keeney, R.L.;Raiffa, H. (1976): Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, New York

• Kortman, J.G.M.;Lindeijer, E.W.;Sas, H.;Sprengers, M. (1994): Towards a Single Indicator for Emissions — an Exercise in Aggregating Environmental Effects. IDES Amsterdam

  Google Scholar 

• Krewitt, W.;Mayerhofer, P.;Trukenmüller, A.;Friedrich, R. (1998): Application of the impact pathway analysis in the context of LCA; The long way from burden to impact. Int. J. LCA 3 (2) 86–94

  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Lindeijer, E. (1994): The Valuation within LCA: Aim, Criteria and Procedure, inUdo de Haes, H.A.;Schaltegger, S.;Hofstetter, P. (Eds.), First Working Document on Life-Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology. Workshop held at ETH Zurich from July 8–9, 1994 pp.l63–170

• Marris, C.;Langford, I.H.;O’riordan, T. (1998): A Quantitative Test of the Cultural Theory of Risk Perceptions: Comparison with the Psychometric Paradigm. Risk Analysis, Vol. 18, No.5, 635–647

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Mengel Jørgensen, A.-M. (1996): LCA Stakeholders and Weighing of Environmental Problems; a Theoretical Approach to Differing Valuation Criteria. Amsterdam

• Mettier, Th. (1999): Der Vergleich von Schutzgütern — Ausgewählte Resultate einer Panelbefragung. inHofstetter, P.;Mettier, Th.;Tietje, O. (Eds.), Ansätze zum Vergleich von Umweltschäden. 9. Diskussionsforum ökobilanzen, UNS-ETH Zürich, ISBN 3-906734-06–4

• Müller-Wenk, R. (1997): Safeguard Subjects and Damage Functions as Core Elements of Life-Cycle Impact Assessment. IWö-Diskussionsbeitrag Nr.42, St. Gallen

• Murray, Ch.J.L.;Lopez, A.D. (Eds.) (1996): The Global Burden of Disease, Volume I of Global Burden of Disease and Injury Series. WHO / Harvard School of Public Health/ World Bank, Harvard University Press, Boston

  Google Scholar 

• O’Riordan, T.;Rayner, S. (1991): Risk Management for Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change 1 (2): 91–108

  Article  Google Scholar 

• OECD (1995): The Life Cycle Approach: An Overview of Product/Process Analysis. Technology and Environment, OECD/GD(95)118, Paris

• Owens, W. (1998): Life Cycle Impact Assessment: The Use of Subjective Judgements in Classification and Characterisation. Int J LCA 3(1): 43–6

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Potting, J.;Hauschild, M. (1997): Predicted Environmental Impact and Expected Occurrence of Actual Environmental Impact. Part I: The Linear Nature of Environmental Impact from Emissions in Life Cycle Assessmenr. Int J LCA 2(3): 171–7; Part II: Spatial Differentiation in Life-Cycle Assessment via the Site-Dependent Characterisation of Environmental Impact from Emissions. Int J LCA 2 (4)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pottinc, J.;Schöpp, W.;Blok, K.;Hauschild, M. (1998): Site-dependent life-cycle impact assessment in acidification. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2 (2):63–87

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rayner, S. (1991): A Cultural Perspective on the Structure and Implementation of Global Environmental Agreements. Evaluation Review 15(1): l75–102

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rayner, St. (1987): Risk and Relativism in Science for Policy. In Johnson B.B., Covello V.T. (Eds.), The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk, pp.5–23

• Rayner, St.;Cantor, R. (1987): How Fair is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice. Risk Analysis 7 (1): 3–9

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Scheringer, M. (1999): Persistenz und Reichweite von Umweltchemikalien. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

  Google Scholar 

• Scheringer, M.;Berg, M. (1994): Spatial and Temporal Range as Measures of Environmental Threat. Fresenius Envir Bull 3: 493–8

  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Schmidt-Bleek, F. (1993): MIPS Re-Visited. Fresenius Envir Bull 2: 407–12

  Google Scholar 

• Schwarz, M.;Thompson, M. (1990): Divided we Stand; Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. University of Pennsylvania Press

• SETAC (1993): Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’. Workshop Sesimbra, 31.3.-3.4.1993, Brussels

  Google Scholar 

• Steen, B.;Ryding, S.-O. (1992): Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Federation of Swedish Industries, The EPS Enviro-accounting Method. Goteborg

• Thompson, M.;Ellis, R.;Wildavsky, A. (1990): Cultural Theory. Westview Print, Boulder

  Google Scholar 

• Thompson, M.;Rayner, St.; Cultural Discourses, in Rayner, St.; Malone, L. (Eds.) (1998): Human Choice and Climate Change. Vol.1, Batelle Press, Columbus Ohio

  Google Scholar 

• Timmermann, P. (1986): Mythology and Surprise in the Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, in Clark, W.C.; Munn, R.E. (Eds.), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Udo de Haes, H.A.;Wrisberg, N. (Eds.) (1997): Life Cycle Assessment: State-of-the-Art and Research Priorities. Results of LCANET, a Concerted Action in the Environment and Climate Programme (DG XII), LCA Documents, Volume 1, Eco-Informa Press, Bayreuth

  Google Scholar 

• Udo de Haes, H.A.;Jolliet, O.;Finnveden, G.;Hauschild, M.;Krewttt, W.;Müller-Wenk, R. (Eds.) (1999): Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Background document for the second working group on Life Cycle Impact Assessment of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2). Int.J.LCA 4 (2) 66-74/ 4 (3) 167–174

  Google Scholar 

• Volkwein, St.;Klöpffer, W. (1996): The Valuation Step in LCA: Part I: General Principles. Int J LCA 1(1): 36–9

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• VROM (ed.) (1994): Policy document on products and the environment. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM), The Hague

  Google Scholar 

• Weber, O.;Scholz, R.W.;Bühlmann, R.;Grasmück, D. (1999): Risk Perception of heavy metal soil contamination and attitudes to decontamination strategies. UNS Working Paper 19, Natural and Social Science Interface, ETH Zurich

  Google Scholar 

• WHO (1947): The Constitution of the World Health Organization. WHO Chronical 1: 29, Geneva

  Google Scholar 

• Wrisberg, N.;Gameson, T. (Eds.) (1998): CHAINET Definition Document, European Network on Chain Analysis for Environmental Decision Support. CML Leiden

Download references