Abstract
This chapter reviews the ‘democracy is dead’ discourse using multiple sources of data. It finds that at the very least there is some distortion in the presentation of results and some inconsistencies across sources. Nevertheless, it is clear that democracy is under threat and that it cannot be assumed to be the natural ideology of choice. In addition to existing authoritarian forms of government, illiberal democracy has emerged as the twenty-first century’s vision of fascism. Loyal to electoral democracy, illiberalism takes control of the state for its own purposes that are largely nationalistic, anti-minority, anti-freedom driven by strong leaders and their associates. Democracy is not dead, but it now has strong challengers. Schools in illiberal societies will feel this challenge through cultural and civic programmes that reflect the values of an illiberal regime.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Board of Principal Investigators. (2021). Kellogg Institute, https://www.v-dem.net/en/about/about-v-dem/kellogg-institute/
Bonet, L. & Zamorano, M. (2020). Cultural policies in illiberal democracies: A conceptual framework based on the Polish and Hungarian governing experiences. International Journal of Cultural Policy [First-Online]. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1806829
Dancs, K., & Fülöp, M. (2019). Past and present of socal science education in Hungary. Journal of Social Science Education, 19(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.4119/jsse-3273
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2021). Democracy index 2020—In sickness and in health. https://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/democracy-index-2020.pdf
Ehman, L. (1980). The American school in the political socialisation process. Review of Educational Research, 50(1), 99–119.
Freedom House. (2020). Freedom in the world 2020. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/ files/2020-02/FIW_2020_REPORT_BOOKLET_Final.pdf
Freedom House. (2021). Freedom in the world 2021 - Democracy under Seige. Freedom House.
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? National Interest, Summer, pp. 3–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184
Grossman, D. (2008). Introduction. In D. Grossman, W. O. Lee, & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Citizenship curriculum in Asia and the Pacific. Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong, Springer.
Heffer, A. (2020, December 18). Is democracy dead? – And, if not, is it worth saving? Justice Magazine. https://aninjusticemag.com/is-democracy-dead-7d43a7a6c391
Hirsch, M. (2021, January 18). Fukuyama: Expect more violence before America returns to sanity. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/01/18/fukuyama-end-of-history-capitol-violence-democracy/
Knutsen, C. (2014). Measuring democracy. In A. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer Reference. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3874
Krzywosz-Rynkiewicz, B., Zalewska, A., & Kennedy, K. (Eds.). (2018). Young people and active citizenship in post-Soviet times – A challenge for citizenship education. Routledge.
Li, H. (2021). The relationship between regime “type” and civic education. Springer.
Metelska-Szaniawska, K., & Lewkowicz, J. (2020). Post-socialist “illiberal democracies”: Do de jure constitutional rights matter? Constitutional Political Economy [First Online] https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-020-09316-4
Molnár, V. (2020). Civil society in an illiberal democracy: Government friendly NGOs, “foreign agents”, and uncivil publics. In J. Kovács & B. Trencsényi (Eds.), Brave new Hungary: Mapping the “system of national cooperation” (pp. 51–72). Lexington Books.
Mounk, Y. (2020). The end of history revisited. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 22–35.
Pepperell, K. (2018). Democracy is dead: Nietzsche and Trump: Exceptionalism and the politics of obfuscation. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Plattner, M. (2019). Illiberal democracy and the struggle on the right. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 5–19.
Sata, R., & Karolewski, I. (2019). Caesarean politics in Hungary and Poland. East European Politics, 36(2), 206–225.
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower. secondary school students in 38 countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Amsterdam: The Netherlands.
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2021). Democracy index 2020. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2020/
Transparency International. (2021). Corruption Index 2020. Retrieved November 25, 2021, from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl#
V-Dem Institute. (2020). Autocratization surges – Resistance grows – Democracy Report 2020. Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/de/39/de39af54-0bc5-4421-89ae-fb20dcc53dba/democracy_report.pdf
Wang, Y. P., & Kennedy, K. (In press). Regime-supporting or regime-challenging? Chinese secondary students’ intentions for future political participation. Citizenship Teaching and Learning.
World Justice Project. (2020). Rule of law index 2020. https://worldjusticeproject.org/sites/default/files/documents/WJP-ROLI-2020-Online_0.pdf
World Justice Project. (2021). Research and data. https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/wjp-rule-law-index
Zakaria, F. (1997). The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22–43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kennedy, K.J. (2021). Is Democracy ‘Dead’?. In: Civic Engagement in Changing Contexts. SpringerBriefs in Education(). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7495-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7495-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7494-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7495-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)