[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Evaluating FAIRness of Genomic Databases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2020)

Abstract

Several studies show the difficulty experienced for the reuse of the ever increasing amount of genomic data. Initiatives are being created to mitigate this concern; one of the most well-known is the FAIR Data Principles. Nonetheless, the related works are too generic and do not describe simultaneously and properly the human and machine perspectives of the FAIRness of databases. Hence, in order to bridge this gap, our paper introduces an approach named the Bio FAIR Evaluator Framework, a semiautomated tool aimed to analyze the FAIRness of genomic databases. Furthermore, we performed experiments that analyzed selected genomic databases according to two orthogonal and complementary perspectives (human and machine). The approach uses standardized FAIR metrics and generates recommendation reports to researchers indicating how to enhance the FAIRness of databases. Our findings, when compared with related works, show the feasibility of the approach, indicating that the current genomic databases are poorly compliant with FAIR Principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.ebi.ac.uk/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.uniprot.org/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.genome.jp/kegg/.

  5. 5.

    doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3949344

References

  1. Paquetto, I., Ranfles, B., Borgman, C.: On the reuse of scientific data. Data Sci. J. 16, 8 (2017)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Hey, T., Trefethen, A.: The Data Deluge: an e-science Perspective.Ā Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality, pp. 809ā€“824. Wiley-Blackwell (2003)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Bayat, A.: Bioinformatics: science, medicine, and the future: bioinformatics. Br. Med. J. 324(7344), 1018ā€“1022 (2002)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Cook, C., Bergman, M., Finn, R., Cochrane, G., et al.: The European bioinformatics institute in 2016: data growth and integration. Nucl. Acids Res. 44(D1), D20ā€“D26 (2016)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. GonƧalves, R., Musen, M.: The variable quality of metadata about biological samples used in biomedical experiments. Sci. Data 6, 190021 (2019)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I., Apleton, G., Axt, M., et al.: The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Navarro, F., Mohsen, H., Yan, C., Li, S., Gu, M., Meyerson, W.: Genomics and data science: an application within an umbrella. Genome Biol. 20, 109 (2019)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Wallis, J.: Data producers courting data reusers: two cases from modeling communities. Int. J. Digit. Curation 9(1) (2014)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Stephens, Z., Lee, S., Faghri, F., Campbell, R., Zhai, C., Efron, M., et al.: Big data: astronomical or genomical. PLoS Biol. 13(7), e1002195 (2015)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Re3Data. https://www.re3data.org. Last accessed 06 June 2020

  11. Bouadjenek, M., Verspoor, K., Zobel, Z.: Automated detection of records in biological sequence databases that are inconsistent with the literature. J. Biomed. Inform. 71, 229ā€“240 (2017)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Miron, L., GonƧalves, R., Musen, M.: Obstacles to the Reuse of Study Metadata in Clini-calTrials.gov. BioRxiv (2020)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. GonƧalves, R., Connor, M., Romero, M., Graybeal, J., Musen, M.: Metadata in the biosample online repository are impaired by numerous anomalies. In: 1st Workshop on Enabling Open Semantic Science, pp. 39ā€“46 (2017)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Mons, B., Cameron, N., et al.: Cloudy, increasingly FAIR: revisiting the FAIR data guiding principles for the European open science cloud. Info. Serv. Use 37(1), 49ā€“56 (2017)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Sansone, S., Santos, B., et al.: Evaluating FAIR maturity through a scalable, automated, community-governed framework. Sci. Data 6(174), 1ā€“12 (2019)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Dunning, A., Smaele, M., Bohmer, J.: Are the fair data principles fair? Int. J. Digit. Curation 12(2), 177ā€“195 (2017)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Bahim, C., Dekkers, M., Wyns, B.: Results of an Analysis of existing FAIR assessment tools. RDA (2019)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financed in part by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Programa de EducaĆ§Ć£o Tutorial (PET) and CoordenaĆ§Ć£o de AperfeiƧoamento de Pessoal de NĆ­vel Superior ā€“ Brasil (CAPES) ā€“ Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matheus Pedra Puime FeijoĆ³ .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

FeijoĆ³, M.P.P., Jardim, R., da Cruz, S.M.S., Campos, M.L.M. (2020). Evaluating FAIRness of Genomic Databases. In: Grossmann, G., Ram, S. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12584. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65847-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65847-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65846-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65847-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics