[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting CBR values using gaussian process regression and meta-heuristic algorithms in geotechnical engineering

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test is a vital tool in geotechnical engineering and is useful in controlled laboratory settings and dynamic field applications. It plays a pivotal role in determining the load-bearing properties of subgrade soil, which is essential for various construction projects, including retaining walls, highway embankments, bridge abutments, and earth dams. CBR values obtained from this test are fundamental for assessing soil strength and integrity, making it a cornerstone of geotechnical engineering. This paper presents an innovative method for predicting CBR values with high precision. It employs Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) to develop complex and highly accurate predictive models. These models encompass a wide range of soil characteristics, such as particle distribution, plasticity, linear shrinkage, and the type and quantity of stabilizing additives. The GPR model significantly improves predictive modeling accuracy by establishing robust relationships between these soil attributes and CBR values. Additionally, the study incorporates two advanced meta-heuristic algorithms, the Dynamic Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm (DAOA) and Leader Harris Hawk’s Optimization (LHHO), to enhance the precision of the predictive model. This collaborative effort resulted in the creation of three models: GPR + LHHO (GPLH), GPR + DAOA (GPDA), and GPR. The GPDA model stands out with exceptional predictive capabilities, achieving a remarkable R2 value of 0.989 during training and an optimal RMSE of 1.488, confirming its precision and consistency. This innovative approach advances CBR prediction and reinforces the reliability of geotechnical engineering practices across diverse soil conditions, making it a significant contribution to the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data can be shared upon request.

References

  • Ahmad M et al (2023) Predicting California bearing ratio of HARHA-treated expansive soils using Gaussian process regression. Sci Rep 13(1):13593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbarzadeh MR, Ghafourian H, Anvari A, Pourhanasa R, Nehdi ML (2023) Estimating compressive strength of concrete using neural electromagnetic field optimization. Materials 16(11):4200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alzabeebee S, Mohamad SA, Al-Hamd RKS (2022) Surrogate models to predict maximum dry unit weight, optimum moisture content and California bearing ratio form grain size distribution curve. Road Mater Pavement Design 23(12):2733–2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan A, Gokceoglu C, Burman A, Samui P, Asteris PG (2021) Efficient computational techniques for predicting the California bearing ratio of soil in soaked conditions. Eng Geol 291:106239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt S, Jain PK, Pradesh M (2014) Prediction of California bearing ratio of soils using artificial neural network. Am Int J Res Sci Technol Eng Math 8:156–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Black WPM (1962) A method of estimating the California bearing ratio of cohesive soils from plasticity data. Geotechnique 12(4):271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Zhang L (2022) A machine learning-based method for predicting the end-bearing capacity of rock-socketed shafts. Rock Mech Rock Eng 55(3):1743–1757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng M-Y, Huang C-C, Van Roy AF (2013) Predicting project success in construction using an evolutionary Gaussian process inference model. J Civ Eng Manag 19(sup1):S202–S211

    Google Scholar 

  • Chithra S, Kumar SRRS, Chinnaraju K, Ashmita FA (2016) A comparative study on the compressive strength prediction models for High-Performance Concrete containing nano silica and copper slag using regression analysis and Artificial Neural Networks. Constr Build Mater 114:528–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duque J, Fuentes W, Rey S, Molina E (2020) Effect of grain size distribution on California bearing ratio (CBR) and modified proctor parameters for granular materials. Arab J Sci Eng 45:8231–8239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebden M, Gaussian processes: A quick introduction, arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.02965, 2015.

  • Erdal HI, Karakurt O, Namli E (2013) High performance concrete compressive strength forecasting using ensemble models based on discrete wavelet transform. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(4):1246–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2012.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris Hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho LS, Tran VQ (2022) Machine learning approach for predicting and evaluating California bearing ratio of stabilized soil containing industrial waste. J Clean Prod 370:133587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeagwuani CC (2021) Estimation of modified expansive soil CBR with multivariate adaptive regression splines, random forest and gradient boosting machine. Innov Infrastruct Sol 6(4):199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan MI, Mitchell TM (1979) Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349:255–260

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Karballaeezadeh N, Ghasemzadeh Tehrani H, Mohammadzadeh Shadmehri D, Shamshirband S (2020) Estimation of flexible pavement structural capacity using machine learning techniques. Front Struct Civil Eng 14:1083–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimiazar J, Sharifi Teshnizi E, Mirzababaei M, Mahdad M, Arjmandzadeh R (2022) California bearing ratio of a reactive clay treated with nano-additives and cement. J Mater Civil Eng 34:4021431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassa SM, Wubineh BZ (2023) Use of machine learning to predict California bearing ratio of soils. Adv Civil Eng 2023:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khasawneh MA, Al-Akhrass HI, Rabab’ah SR, Al-sugaier AO (2022) Prediction of California bearing ratio using soil index properties by regression and machine-learning techniques. Int J Pavement Res Technol 17:306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodadadi N, Snasel V, Mirjalili S (2022) Dynamic arithmetic optimization algorithm for truss optimization under natural frequency constraints. IEEE Access 10:16188–16208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masoumi F, Najjar-Ghabel S, Safarzadeh A, Sadaghat B (2020) Automatic calibration of the groundwater simulation model with high parameter dimensionality using sequential uncertainty fitting approach. Water Supply 20(8):3487–3501. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraju TV, Bahrami A, Prasad CD, Mantena S, Biswal M, Islam MR (2023) Predicting california bearing ratio of lateritic soils using hybrid machine learning technique. Buildings 13(1):255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen Duc M, Ho Sy A, Nguyen Ngoc T, Hoang Thi TL (2022) An artificial intelligence approach based on multi-layer perceptron neural network and random forest for predicting maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of soil material in quang Ninh Province, Vietnam, in CIGOS 2021, Emerging Technologies and Applications for Green Infrastructure: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geotechnics, Civil Engineering and Structures, Springer, 1745–1754.

  • Omran BA, Chen Q, Jin R (2016) Comparison of data mining techniques for predicting compressive strength of environmentally friendly concrete. J Comput Civ Eng 30(6):4016029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putra H, Yudhistira I (2022) Improvement of the California bearing ratio of peat soil using soybean crude urease calcite precipitation. Civ Eng J 8(11):2411–2423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassoul A, Mojtaba K (2015) Predicting maximum dry density, optimum moisture content and California bearing ratio (CBR) through soil index using ordinary least squares (OLS) and artificial neural networks (ANNS). Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng 5(3):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedaghat B, Tejani GG, Kumar S (2023) Predict the maximum dry density of soil based on individual and hybrid methods of machine learning. Adv Eng Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.22034/aeis.2023.414188.1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar DK (2014) A study of correlation between California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value with other properties of soil. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 4(1):559–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarawneh B (2017) Predicting standard penetration test N-value from cone penetration test data using artificial neural networks. Geosci Front 8(1):199–204

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tarawneh B (2018) Gene expression programming model to predict driven pipe piles set-up, Int J Geotech Eng 14: 538

  • Wan ZY, Sapsis TP (2017) Reduced-space Gaussian Process Regression for the data-driven probabilistic forecast of chaotic dynamical systems. Physica D 345:40–55

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Lei Z, Zhang X, Zhou B, Peng J (2016) Machine learning basics, Deep learning, 98–164

  • Xiao-xia L (2022) Predicting California-bearing capacity value of stabilized pond ash with lime and lime sludge applying hybrid optimization algorithms. Multiscale and Multidiscip Model Experim Design 5(2):157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z-H (2021) Machine learning. Springer Nature, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation Project of Nantong City in 2023 (JC2023109).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Data collection, simulation, and analysis were performed by “Xu Wu, Feng Yang, and Shuchen Huang”. The first draft of the manuscript was written by “Xu Wu” and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, X., Yang, F. & Huang, S. Predicting CBR values using gaussian process regression and meta-heuristic algorithms in geotechnical engineering. Multiscale and Multidiscip. Model. Exp. and Des. 7, 3799–3813 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-024-00428-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-024-00428-0

Keywords

Navigation