[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A dynamic and optimized routing approach for VANET communication in smart cities to secure intelligent transportation system via a chaotic multi-verse optimization algorithm

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

VANET technology is an essential component of Intelligent Transportation Systems, which makes c communication between moving cars and stationary Road Side Units more accessible. It allows vehicle nodes to share crucial data among communication devices. VANET has significant potential to enhance traffic efficiency and road safety. This is accomplished by decreasing the chances of collisions between vehicles and reducing the number of accidents. Man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks are a crucial issue in VANET which needs significant consideration from researchers. To solve the problem of man-in-the-middle attacks, this article presents a dynamic and optimized routing approach for VANET conversation in smart cities by utilizing a chaotic secure multi-verse optimization algorithm. The strategy that has been proposed seeks to achieve the goal of ensuring safe and effective interaction between vehicles participating in VANETs by dynamically determining the optimal path for the exchange of data. A chaotic protect multi-verse optimization approach is used to generate several random sequences from which the most secure route may be selected. This is done to enhance the security of the VANET transmission network during transmission. The results of the trials indicate that the suggested technique is more successful in avoiding MITM and improving the functioning of VANET connections in settings that are characterized by intelligent cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing does not apply to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

VANET:

Vehicular ad hoc network

MITMA:

Man-in-the-middle

WiFi:

Wireless fidelity

LTE:

Long-term evolution

ITS:

Intelligent transportation systems

GA:

Genetic algorithm

DORA:

Dynamic and optimized routing approach

PDR:

Packet delivery ratio

DSRC:

Dedicated short-range communication

SVM:

Support vector machines

AODV:

Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector

D.Q.N.:

Deep Q networks

DRL:

Deep reinforcement learning

MANET:

Mobile ad hoc networks

SMO:

Secure multi-verse optimisation

CSMO:

Chaotic secure multi-verse optimisation

MHDOR:

MVO-based hybrid dynamic and optimized routing

BS:

Base station

E2E:

End-to-end

CDR:

Coordinated direct and relay

References

  1. Arora, S., Monga, H.: A comprehensive review on routing in VANET. Int. J. Grid Distrib. Comput. 9, 375–384 (2016). https://doi.org/10.14257/ijgdc.2016.9.10.33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goel, N., Sharma, G., Dhyani, I.: A study of position-based VANET routing protocols. Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Autom. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAA.2016.7813803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raghuwanshi, V., Lilhore, U.: Neighbor trust algorithm (NTA) to protect VANET from denial of service attack (DoS). Int. J. Comput. Appl. 140(8), 8–12 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brendha, R., Prakash, V. S. J.: A survey on routing protocols for vehicular Ad Hoc networks. In 2017 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), pp. 1–7, IEEE (2017)

  5. Qin, H., Yu, C.: A road network connectivity aware routing protocol for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. In 2017 IEEE International conference on vehicular electronics and safety (ICVES), pp. 57–62, IEEE (2017)

  6. Ahmad, F., Adnane, A., Franqueira, V.N., Kurugollu, F., Liu, L.: Man-in-the-middle attacks in vehicular ad-hoc networks: evaluating the impact of attackers’ strategies. Sensors 18(11), 4040 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gayathri, N.B., Thumbur, G., Reddy, P.V., Rahman, M.Z.U.: Efficient pairing-free certificateless authentication scheme with batch verification for vehicular ad-hoc networks. IEEE Access 6, 31808–31819 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan, A.U.: Real-time and Efficient Unicast Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Network: A Survey and Recommendations for Efficiency Enhancement. 2018 15th In-ternational Conference on Smart Cities: Improving Quality of Life Using ICT and IoT (HONET-ICT), pp. 117–121 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1109/HONET.2018.8551330

  9. Le, D.N., Seth, B., Dalal, S.: A hybrid approach of secret sharing with frag-mentation and encryption in a cloud environment for securing outsourced medical data-base: a revolutionary approach. J. Cyber Secur. Mobil. 7, 379–408 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cardenas, L.L., Mezher, A.M., Bautista, P.A.B., Igartua, M.A.: A probability-based multimetric routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks in urban scenarios. IEEE Access 7, 178020–178032 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2958743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gazori, R., Mirjalily, G.: SBGRP as an Improved Stable CDS-Based Routing Proto-col in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. 2019 27th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engi-neering (ICEE), pp. 1979–1983 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/IranianCEE.2019.8786705.

  12. Joshua, C.J., Duraisamy, R., Varadarajan, V.: A reputation-based weighted clustering protocol in VANET: A multi-objective firefly approach. Mob. Netw. Appl. 24, 1199–1209 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lilhore, U.K., Dalal, S., Simaiya, S.: A cognitive security framework for detecting intrusions in IoT and 5G utilizing deep learning. Comput. Secur. 136, 103560 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Debnath, A., Basumatary, H., Dhar, M., Debbarma, M.K., Bhattacharyya, B.K.: Fuzzy logic-based VANET routing method to increase the QoS by considering the dynamic nature of vehicles. Computing 103, 1391–1415 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh, G.D., Prateek, M., Kumar, S., Verma, M., Singh, D., Lee, H.N.: Hybrid genetic firefly algorithm-based routing protocol for VANETs. IEEE Access 10, 9142–9151 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gayathri, M., Gomathy, C.: A deep survey on types of cyber attacks in VANET. J Crit Rev 8(01), 1029–1039 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sindhwani, M., Sachdeva, S., Arora, K., Yoon, T., Yoo, D., Joshi, G.P., Cho, W.: Soft computing techniques aware clustering-based routing protocols in vehicular ad hoc networks: a review. Appl. Sci. 12, 7922 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raju, K.S., Selvakumar, K.: Dynamic and optimized routing approach (DORA) in vehicular Ad hoc networks (VANETs). Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 13(3), 151–156 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nazib, R.A., Moh, S.: Routing protocols for unmanned aerial vehicle-aided Ve-hicular Ad Hoc Networks: a survey. IEEE Access 8, 77535–77560 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nazib, R.A., Moh, S.: Reinforcement learning-based routing protocols for Vehic-ular Ad Hoc networks: a comparative survey. IEEE Access 9, 27552–27587 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmed, N., Deng, Z., Memon, I., Hassan, F., Mohammadani, K.H., Iqbal, R.: A sur-vey on location privacy attacks and prevention deployed with IoT in vehicular net-works. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6503299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Akwirry, B., Bessis, N., Malik, H., McHale, S.: A multi-tier trust-based security mechanism for vehicular Ad-Hoc network communications. Sensors (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-shareeda, M.A., Anbar, M., Manickam, S., Hasbullah, I.H.: Review of prevention schemes for man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack in vehicular Ad hoc networks. Int. J. Eng. Manag. Res. 10(3), 153–158 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.10.3.23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Shareeda, M.A., Manickam, S.: A systematic literature review on security of vehicular Ad-hoc network (VANET) based on VEINS framework. IEEE Access (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3274774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goyal, K., Tripathi, A. K., Agarwal, G.: Security Attacks, Requirements and Au-thentication Schemes in VANET. IEEE Int. Conf. Issues Challenge Intell. Comput. Tech. ICICT 2019 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT46931.2019.8977656.

  26. Hussain, R., Lee, J., Zeadally, S.: Trust in VANET: a survey of current solutions and future research opportunities. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 22(5), 2553–2571 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.2973715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khanna, H., Sharma, M.: An improved security algorithm for VANET using machine learning. J. Posit. Sch. Psychol. 6(3), 7743–7756 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar, A., et al.: Black hole attack detection in vehicular ad-hoc network using secure AODV routing algorithm. Microprocess. Microsyst. 80, 103352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, B., Xu, G., Xu, G., Wang, C., Zuo, P.: Deep reinforcement learning-based intelligent security forwarding strategy for VANET. Sensors 23(3), 1204 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahmood, J., Duan, Z., Yang, Y., Wang, Q., Nebhen, J., Bhutta, M.N.M.: Security in vehicular Ad Hoc networks: challenges and countermeasures. Secur. Commun. Net-works 1, 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9997771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Peyman, M., Fluechter, T., Panadero, J., Serrat, C., Xhafa, F., Juan, A.A.: Optimization of vehicular networks in smart cities: from agile optimization to learnheuristics and simheuristics. Sensors 23(1), 499 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Quyoom, A., Mir, A.A., Sarwar, D.A.: Security attacks and challenges of VANETs: a literature survey. J. Multimed. Inf. Syst. 7(1), 45–54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.33851/jmis.2020.7.1.45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Khedkar, S., Mahajan, R.: Optimized and efficient authentication in VANET using blockchain. SSRN Electron. J. (2022). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4203801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dalal, S., Seth, B., Jaglan, V., Malik, M., Surbhi Dahiya, N., Hu, Y.C.: An adaptive traffic routing approach toward load balancing and congestion control in Cloud–MANET ad hoc networks. Soft Comput. 26(11), 5377–5388 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharma, S., Reddy, K.H.: Performance comparison of vehicular Ad Hoc network in wireless sensor networking. J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res. 8(8), 1–3 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Khan, U.A., Lee, S.S.: Multi-layer problems and solutions in VANETs: a review. Electronics 8, 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8020204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gupta, A.: VANET Protection Survey: Issues, Threats and Solutions VANET Security Requirements Attacks in VANCET, classification and protective measures (2021)

  38. Hussein, N.H., Yaw, C.T., Koh, S.P., Tiong, S.K., Chong, K.H.: A comprehensive survey on vehicular networking: communications, applications, challenges, and up-coming research directions. IEEE Access 10, 86127–86180 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3198656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Krishna, K.V., Reddy, K.G.: VANET vulnerabilities classification and countermeasures: a review. Majlesi J. Elect. Eng. 16(3), 63–83 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Phull, N., Singh, P., Shabaz, M., Sammy, F.: Enhancing vehicular ad hoc networks’ dynamic behavior by integrating game theory and machine learning techniques for reliable and stable routing. Secur. Commun. Netw. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4108231

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge all who have directly/indirectly supported this research.

Funding

We confirm that we have not received any financial support from anyone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, SK; methodology, UKL; validation, RC; formal analysis, SSD; investigation, SSD; resources, SK; data curation, SS; writing—original draft, RC; supervision, SK. All authors contributed equally to this research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surjeet Dalal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sumit, Chhillar, R.S., Dalal, S. et al. A dynamic and optimized routing approach for VANET communication in smart cities to secure intelligent transportation system via a chaotic multi-verse optimization algorithm. Cluster Comput 27, 7023–7048 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04322-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04322-9

Keywords

Navigation