[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Morphometric analysis of the River Thamirabarani sub-basin in Kanyakumari District, South west coast of Tamil Nadu, India, using remote sensing and GIS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quantitative analysis of the drainage morphometric system is vital to understand the hydrological and environmental interaction and its processes of an area. The present study deals with quantitative characteristics of morphometry of steep slope and short length sub-basin of R. Thamirabarani in Kanyakumari District, Tamilnadu, India, using geospatial technology. In this study, the digital elevation model data product (ASTER DEM), Landsat ETM+ image and Survey of India topographical map were used to delineate slope, relief and drainage system structures such as drainage pattern, stream order, stream network and stream length of the sub-basin using ArcGIS 9.3 software. The morphometric analysis deals with hydrologic processes such as stream frequency, bifurcation ratio, circulatory ratio and length of overland flow of the sub-basin area and their influences on the local morphologic landforms. The quantitative measurement of these characteristics is used to explore the basin’s contribution to the hydrological cycle and the shape, size and formation of the local landscapes in the region. Moreover, the hypsometric analysis and denudation rate were estimated for understanding the quantitative geomorphological characteristics of the sub-basin. The relationship of the morphometric parameters reveals that the drainage network is strongly controlled by geological and geomorphological structures of the area. The geometry of streams exhibits dendritic drainage pattern associated with coarse drainage texture in primary order of streams present on hilly terrain surface and semi-dendritic pattern in higher stream order flow on less elevated surface with gentle slope. The drainage density of the study area ranges from 0.1 to 1.89 km/km2, and the maximum density value was found along the higher stream order. The mean bifurcation ratio of this area is 4.21 and the high ratio was measured between the third and fourth order of stream segments. The morphometry of this area is depicted by the length of the stream segment, drainage pattern and stream flow direction, which are influenced by relief, steep slope and local geological structure. Furthermore, the sub-basin is found to be strongly elongated in shape with a length of 42.78 km, and the circularity ratio of this area is measured as 0.33 and elongation ratio as 0.57. The textural dissection of the landforms shows low drainage density in the high elevated hilly terrain in the north and high level in the plain areas in the southern part. The values of the circulatory ratio, length of overland flow and elongation ratio are relatively close to one another and the relationship among them shows their influences on the process of surface runoff and sediment deposition along the estuary landforms in the study area. Moreover, it is observed that the hypsometric curve of this study area is characterized by convex-up shape in nature and represents the youth stage (inequilibrium) of landscapes. Consequently, the hypsometric integral value 0.49 reflects the distribution of a major volume of the landmass (435.32 km2) at relatively low elevations (<180 m). The morphometric parameters-induced denudation rate of this study area is 65.14 t/km2/year and indicates the occurrence of a wide range of denudation intensities throughout the sub-basin, which is relatively proportional to the suspended sediment yield that is transported in the suspension per unit area. Based on the realistic output, it is proved that remote sensing and GIS are effective tools for morphometric studies of the drainage basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed SA, Chandrashekarappa KN, Raj SK, Nischitha V, Kavitha G (2010) Evaluation of morphometric parameters derived from ASTER and SRTM DEM—a study on Bandihole sub-watershed basin in Karnataka. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avena GC, Giuliano G, Palmieri EL (1967) Quantitative evaluation of the hierarchization and evolution of drainage networks. Bull Soc Geol Italy 86:781–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrami S (2013) Tectonic controls on the morphometry of alluvial fans around Danehkhoshk anticline, Zagros. Iran Geomorphol 180 & 181:217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Band LE (1986) Topographic partition of watersheds with digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 22(1):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennie Jonathan, Mark OH, Baxter R, Huntley B (2006) Influence of slope and aspect on long-term vegetation change in British chalk grasslands. J Ecol 94(2):355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat TN, Shetty A, Hegde VS (2011) Spatial variation in drainage characteristics and geomorphic instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH): implications for watershed management-a case study of the Varada River basin, Northern Karnataka. Catena 87:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop P (2007) Long-term landscape evolution: linking tectonics and surface processes. Earth Surf Proc Land 32:329–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop P, Cowell P (1997) Lithological and drainage network determinants of the character of drowned, embayed coastlines. J Geol 105(6):685–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet S, Crave A (2003) Landscape response to climate change: insights from experimental modelling and implications for tectonic versus climatic uplift of topography. Geology 31:123–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbank DW, Blythe AE, Putkonen J, Pratt-Sitaula B, Gabet E, Oskin M, Barros A, Ojha TP (2003) Decoupling of erosion and precipitation in the Himalayas. Nature 426:652–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capolongo D, Cecaro G, Giano SI, Lazzari M, Schiattarella M (2005) Structural control on drainage pattern of the south-western side of the Agri River upper valley, southern Apennines, Italy. Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 28:169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra R, Dhiman RD, Sharma PK (2005) Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur district, Punjab using Remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(4):531–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chorley RJ (1957) Illustrating the laws of morphometry. Geol Mag, pp 94–95

  • Ciccacci S, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E, Pugliese F (1980) Contributo dell’analisi geomorfica quantitativa alla valutazione dell’entità dell’erosione nei bacini fluviali. Boll Soc Geol It 99:455–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccacci S, Fredi P, Lupia Palmieri E, Pugliese F (1986) Indirect evaluation of erosion entity in drainage basins through geomorphic, climatic and hydrological parameters. Int Geomorphol 2:33–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccacci S, Del Monte M, Marini R (2003) Denudational processes and recent morphological change in a sample area of the Orcia River upper basin (Southern Tuscany). Geogr Fis Dinam Quat 26:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke JI (1966) Morphometry from maps, Essays in geomorphology. Elsevier, New York, pp 235–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Monte M, Fredi P, Palmieri EL, Marini R (2002) Contribution of quantitative geomorphic analysis to the evaluation of geomorphological hazards. In: Allison R, Chichester J (eds) Applied geomorphology: theory and practice. Wiley, pp 335–358

  • Della Seta M, Del Monte M, Fredi P, Palmieri EL (2007) Direct and indirect evaluation of denudation rates in Central Italy. Catena 71:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devi RKM (2008) Geomorphic appraisals of active tectonics associated with the uplift of the Gohpur–Ganga section in Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Geomorphology 99:76–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eze EB, Joel E (2010) Morphometric parameters of the calabar river basin: implication for hydrologic processes. J Geogr Geol 2(1):19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield J, Leymarie P (1991) Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 30(6):1681–1692

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabet EJ, Burbank DW, Pratt-Sitaula B, Putkonen J, Bookhagen B (2008) Modern erosion rates in the High Himalayas of Nepal. Earth Planet Sci Lett 267:482–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia D, Martino C, Schiattarella M (2011) Long to short-term denudation rates in the southern Apennines: geomorphological markers and chronological constraints. Geol Carpath 62:27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory KJ, Walling DE (1973) Drainage basin from and process: a geomorphological approach. Wiley, New York, pp 456–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann CH, Riccomini C, Alves FM (2007) SRTM-based morphotectonic analysis of the Pocos de Caldas alkaline Massif, southeastern Brazil. Comput Geosci 33:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell AM, Montgomery AR (1999) Hydrological applications of GIS. Wiley, Chichester, pp 176–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull Geo Soc Am 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtez JE, Sol C, Lucazeau F (1999) Effect of drainage area on hypsometry from an analysis of small-scale drainage basins in the Siwalik Hills (Central Nepal). Earth Surf Proc Land 24:799–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javed A, Khanday MY, Ahmed R (2009) Prioritization of Sub-watersheds based on Morphometric and Land use analysis using Remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Remote Sens 37:261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerry Davis (2010) Hypsometric Tools Script by Jerry Davis. http://arcscripts.esri.com/details.asp?dbid=16830 Accessed on 15th Aug 2014

  • Kale VS, Mudholkar AV, Phansalkar VG, Peshwa VV (1990) Stratigraphy of the Bhima group. J Palaeontol Soc India 35:91–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliraj S, Chandrasekar N (2012) Geo-processing model on coastal vulnerability index to explore risk zone along the south west coast of Tamilnadu, India. Int J Earth Sci Engg 5(5):1138–1147

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaliraj S, Muthu MS, Malar VK (2012) Application of remote sensing in detection of forest covers changes using geo-statistical change detection matrices—a case study of Devanampatti reserve forest, Tamilnadu. India. Nat Env Poll Tech 11(2):261–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusre BC (2013) Hypsometric analysis and watershed management of Diyung watershed in North Eastern India. J Geol Soc India 82:262–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langbein WB (1947) Topographic characteristics of drainage basins. US Geol Surv Water Supply Paper 986(C):157–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N (2012) GIS model-based morphometric evaluation of Tamiraparani subbasin, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0742-z

  • Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2011) Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach. Environ Earth Sci 64:373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Kaliraj S (2012) A GIS based automated extraction tool for the analysis of basin morphometry. Bonfring Int J Ind Eng Manag Sci 2(1):32–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidment DR (2002) ArcHydro GIS for water resources. ESRI Press, Redlands, pp 220–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar JP (1982) Morphometric analyses of the 4th order drainage watersheds of the Khowai river basin, Tripura, India—Some preliminary results and observations. J Indian Soc Remote 10(3):49–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Malur MN, Nagendra R (1994) Lithostratigraphy of the Bhima Basin, India (Central part), Karnataka, Southern India. J Palaeontol Soc India 39:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Martz LW, Garbrechet J (1992) Numerical definition of drainage network and sub catchment areas from digital elevation models. Comput Geosci 18(6):747–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martz LW, Garbrecht J (1992) Numerical definition of drainage network and subcatchment areas from digital elevation models. Comput Geosci 18:747–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton MA (1958) Geometric properties of mature drainage systems and their representation in E4 Phase Space. J Geol 66:35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesa LM (2006) Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucuman, Argentina). Environ Geol 50:1235–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphologic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee, Project NR 389042, Technical Report 3. Columbia University Department of Geology, ONR Geography Branch New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moglen GE, Bras RL (1995) The effect of spatial heterogeneities on geomorphic expression in a model of basin evolution. Water Resour Res 31(10):2613–2623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Brandon MT (2002) Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges. Earth Planet Sci Lett 201:481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5(1):3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris DG, Heerdegen RG (1988) Automatically derived catchment boundaries and channel networks and their hydrological applications. Geomorphology 1:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muralikrishnan S, Pillai A, Narender B, Reddy S, Venkataraman VR, Dadhwal VK (2013) Validation of Indian national DEM from Cartosat-1 data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 41:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa S, Yusuf MI (1999) A textbook of hydrology and water resources. 1st edn. Jenas Prints and Publishing Company, Abuja, pp 60–75

  • Nag SK (1998) Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chaka sub-basin, Purulia district, West Bengal. J Indian Soc Remote 26(2):69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag SK, Chakraborty S (2003) Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage nerwork in hard rock area. J Indian Soc Remote 31(1):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra K, Nageswara Rao K (2006) Morphometry of the Mehadrigedda watershed, Visakhapatnam district, Andhrapradesh using GIS and Resourcesat data. J Indian Soc Remote 34:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Hydrology (1993) Geomorphological characteristics of Narmada basin up to Manot. CS (AR)—128, NIH, Roorkee, Technical report, pp 1–34

  • Nautiyal MD (1994) Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin, district Dehradun, Uttarpradesh. J Indian Soc Remote 22(4):251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obi Reddy GP, Maji AK, Gajbhiye KS (2004) Drainage morphometry and its influence on landform characteristics in a basaltic terrain, Central India—a remote sensing and GIS approach. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinfo 6:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ongley ED (1974) Fluvial morphometry on the Cobar Pediplain. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 64(2):281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir H, Bird D (2009) Evaluation of morphometric parameters of drainage networks derived from topographic maps and DEM in point of floods. Environ Geol 56:1405–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankaj A, Kumar P (2009) GIS-based morphometric analysis of five major sub-watersheds of Song River, Dehradun district, Uttarakhand with special reference to landslide incidences. J Indian Soc Remote 37(1):157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrera A, Pérez-Pena JV, Galindo-Zaldívar J, Azanón JM, Azor A (2009) Testing the sensitivity of geomorphic indices in areas of low-rate active folding (eastern Betic Cordillera, Spain). Geomorphology 105:218–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike RJ, Wilson SE (1971) Elevation- relief ratio hypsometric integral and geomorphic area-altitude analysis. Geol Soc Am Bull 82:1079–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Rigon R (1998) Channel networks. In: Jeanloz R, Albee AL, Burke KC (eds) Annual review of earth and planetary sciences, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, 26:289–327

  • Rosenblatt P, Pinet PC (1994) Comparative hypsometric analysis of Earth and Venus. Geophys Res Lett 21:465–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi A, Bhattacharya AK, Singh A, Singh AK (2001) Use of geographic information system (GIS) for determination of erosion status of watersheds. Indian J Soil Conserv 29(3):190–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi A, Madramootoo CA, Enright P (2003) Development of user Interface in ArcGIS for estimation of watershed geomorphology. CSAE/SCGR 2003 meeting, paper No. 03. pp 120–130

  • Schiattarella M, Beneduce P, Capolongo D, Di Leo P, Giano SI, Gioia D, Lazzari M, Martino C (2008) Uplift and erosion rates from the southern Apennines, Italy. Boll Geo Teor Appl 49(2):470–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth, Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull 67:597–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1963) Sinuosity of alluvial rivers on the great plains. Geol Soc Am Bull 74:1089–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh Tejpal (2008) Hypsometric analysis of watersheds developed on actively deforming Mohand anticlinal ridge, NW Himalaya. Geocarto Int 23(6):417–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh O, Sarangi A (2008) Hypsometric analysis of the lesser Himalayan watershed using geographical information system. Indian Jour Soil Conserv 36(3):148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG (1950) Standards for grading textures of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248:655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD, Owais S, Khan HH, Ahmed S (2009) Morphometric analysis of a watershed of South India using SRTM data and GIS. J Geol Soc India 73:543–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD, Sreekanth PD, Khan HH, Ahmed S (2012) Drainage morphometry and its influence on hydrology in an semi arid region: using SRTM data and GIS. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-2172-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasa VS, Govindainah S, Honne Gowda H (2004) Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in the Pawagada area of Tumkur district South India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote 32(4):351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava VK (1997) Study of drainage pattern of Jharia Coalfield (Bihar), India, through remote sensing technology. J Indian Soc Remote 25(1):41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1952) Dynamic basis of geomorphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 63:923–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1954) Statistical analysis in geomorphic research. J Geol 62:1–25

  • Strahler AN (1956) Quantitative slope analysis. Bul Geol Soc Amer 67:571–596

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Quantative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Hand book of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Talling PJ, Sowter MJ (1999) Drainage density on progressively tilted surfaces with different gradients, Wheeler Ridge, California. Earth Surf Proc Land 24:809–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton DG, Baker ME (2008) Towards algebra for terrain-based flow analysis. In: Mount NJ, Harvey GL, Aplin P, Priestnall G (eds) Representing, modeling and visualizing the natural environment: innovations in GIS 13. CRC Press, Boca Taton, Fl, pp 167–194

  • Tarboton DG, Bras RL, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (1991) On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. TT Hydrol Process 5:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokunaga E (2000) Dimension of a channel network and space-filling properties of its basin. Trans Jpn Geom Union 21(4):431–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe A (1992) Automated recognition of valley heads from digital elevation models. Earth Surf Process Landf 16(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincy MV, Rajan Brilliant, Kumar APP (2012) Geographic information system–based morphometric characterization of sub-watersheds of Meenachil river basin, Kottayam district, Kerala, India. Geocarto Int 27(8):661–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whipple KX (2009) The influence of climate on the tectonic evolution of mountain belts. Nat Geosci 2:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whipple KX, Tucker GE (1999) Dynamics of the stream-power river incision model: implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs. J Geophys Res 104:17661–17674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett SD (1999) Orogeny and orography: the effects of erosion on the structure of mountain belts. J Geophys Res 104(B12):28957–28981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JP, Gallant JC (2000) Terrain analysis: principles and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 479–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavoianu I (2011) Hypsometric curves and longitudinal stream profile. Morphometry of drainage basins (Chapter XI) Elsevier, Science series, pp 186–190

Download references

Acknowledgments

The corresponding author is thankful to DST-INSPIRE Division, Department of Science & Technology (DST), Government of India, for the award of INSPIRE Fellowship SRF (DST/INSPIRE/2011/IF110366 and DST/AORC-IF/UPGRD/2013-14/509) for pursuing his Ph.D degree from the Centre for GeoTechnology, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli-12.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Geotechnology, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, 627012, India

    S. Kaliraj, N. Chandrasekar & N. S. Magesh

Authors
  1. S. Kaliraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Chandrasekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N. S. Magesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kaliraj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaliraj, S., Chandrasekar, N. & Magesh, N.S. Morphometric analysis of the River Thamirabarani sub-basin in Kanyakumari District, South west coast of Tamil Nadu, India, using remote sensing and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 73, 7375–7401 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3914-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3914-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation