[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Effects of site geometry on short-distance spatial coherency in Argostoli, Greece

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spatial variation of the earthquake ground motion over short distances can significantly affect the dynamic response of large and extended engineered structures, especially on sites with inhomogeneity in surface geology and geometry. In current practices, such variation is taken into account in terms of coherency, a function of frequency and distance, established on an essentially empirical basis and difficult to extrapolate at different sites. Hence, a better understanding of its physical significance and its relationship with the underlying ground structure is indispensable. A two-dimensional dense array, deployed at the small and shallow Koutavos-Argostoli valley in Cephalonia, Greece, provided an abundance of data to study the stochastic characteristics of seismic ground motions over very short distances. A set of 46 magnitude 2–5 events at epicentral distances 0–200 km has been selected for the analysis. The lagged coherency of the S-wave dominating seismogram was computed for each station-pair within the array and was averaged over various distance intervals for the whole data set. The results indicate a lack of a clear dependence of the average coherency on the magnitude, back azimuth or site-to-source distance of the event. The most striking result concerns the influence of the site geometry: the coherency is systematically lower for the pairs aligned perpendicular to the axis of the valley (2D) compared to those aligned in the parallel direction. This finding is consistent with the dominance of valley-edge generated surface waves propagating from one edge to the other. The averaged coherency estimates are only weakly represented by the existing parametric models, indicating its strong site dependent nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA (1992) Spatial variation of earthquake ground motion for application to soil-structure interaction. Report No. EPRI TR-100463, Tier 2, Palo Alto, CA

  • Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF, Stepp JC (1991) Empirical spatial coherency functions for applications to soil-structure interaction analyses. Earthq Spectra 7:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancheta TD, Stewart JP, Abrahamson NA (2011) Effects of surface geology on seismic motion. In: 4th IASPEI/IAEE international symposium, University of California Santa Barbara, CA

  • Bard P-Y, Bouchon M (1980) The seismic response of sediment-filled valleys. Part 1. The case of incident SH waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:1263–1286

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissieres HP, Vanmarcke EH (1995) Estimation of lags for a seismograph array: wave propagation and composite correlation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14:5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornou C, Bard P-Y, Dietrich M (2003) Contribution of dense array analysis to basin-edge-induced waves identification and quantification, part II: application to Grenoble basin, French Alps. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:2624–2648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cultrera G, Andreou T, Boxberger T et al (2014) The Argostoli (Cephalonia, Greece) experiment. In: Proceedings of the second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology (2ECEES), Istanbul, Turkey, 24–29 Aug

  • Cushing EM, Hollender F, Guyonnet-Benaize C et al (2016) Close to the lair of Odysseus Cyclops: the SINAPS@ postseismic campaign and accelerometric network installation on Kefalonia island—Site effect characterization experiment. In: McCalpin J, Gruetzner C (eds) Proceedings of the 7th INQUA on paleoseismology, active tectonics and archeoseismology, Crestone, Colorado, USA, 30 May–3 June

  • Der Kiureghian A (1996) A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enochson LD, Goodman NR (1965) Gaussian approximations to the distributions of sample coherence. Tech Report, AFFDL TR 65–57, Res. and Technol. Div., AFSC, Wright- Patterson AFB, Ohio

  • Hao H, Oliveira CS, Penzien J (1989) Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-I array data. Nucl Eng Des 111:293–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harichandran RS (1991) Estimating the spatial variation of earthquake ground motion from dense array recordings. Struct Saf 10:219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harichandran RS, Vanmarcke EH (1986) Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time. J Eng Mech ASCE 112:154–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollender F, Perron V, Imtiaz A et al (2015) Close to the lair of Odysseus Cyclops: the SINAPS@ postseismic campaign and accelerometric network installation on Kefalonia Island. In: Proceedings of the 9th Colloque national AFPS 2015, Marne-La-Vallée, France, 30 Nov–2 Dec

  • Huber P (1981) Robust statistics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Imtiaz A (2015) Seismic wave field, spatial variability and coherency of ground motion over short distances: near source and alluvial valley effects. Ph.D. thesis. Université Grenoble Alpes, English, English. <NNT: 2015GREAU002>. <tel-01148138>. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01148138

  • Imtiaz A, Cornou C, Bard P-Y, Hobiger M (2014) Diffracted wave field and coherency analysis: an example from dense array network in Argostoli Basin, Cephalonia, Greece. In: Proceedings of the second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology (2ECEES), Istanbul, Turkey, p 12, 24–29 Aug, Paper # 2351

  • Jenkins GM, Watts DG (1968) Spectral analysis and its application. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao S (2006) Physical characterization of seismic ground motion spatial variation and conditional simulation for performance-based design. Drexel University, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh CH, Lin SG (1990) Directionality and simulation in spatial variation of seismic waves. Eng Struct 12:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luco J, Wong H (1986) Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 14:891–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller J (1991) Short report—reaction time analysis with outlier exclusion: bias varies with sample size. Q J Exp Psychol 43:907–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moczo P, Bard P-Y (1993) Wave diffraction, amplification and differential motion near strong lateral discontinuities. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83:85–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Protopapa E, Papastamatiou DM, Gazetas G (1998) The Ionianet accelerometer array: Early results and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1–8

  • Ramadan O, Novak M (1993) Response of long gravity dams to incoherent seismic ground motions. WIT Press 3:15. doi:10.2495/SDEE930311

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandella L, Paolucci R (2010) Earthquake induced ground strains in the presence of strong lateral soil heterogeneities. Bull Earthq Eng 8:1527–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JF, Stepp JC, Abrahamson NA (1992) The spatial variation of earthquake ground motion and effects of local site conditions. In: Proceedings of the tenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Madrid, Spain, vol 2, pp 967–972

  • Somerville PG, McLaren JP, Saikia CK (1988) Site-specific estimation of spatial incoherence of strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of the earthquake engineering and soil dynamics II, recent advances in ground motion evaluation, ASCE, Park City, UT, pp 188–202, 27–30 June

  • Somerville PG, McLaren JP, Sen MK, Helmberger DV (1991) The influence of site conditions on the spatial incoherence of ground motions. Struct Saf 10:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerva A, Harada T (1997) Effect of surface layer stochasticity on seismic ground motion coherence and strain estimates. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 16:445–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerva A, Stephenson WR (2011) Stochastic characteristics of seismic excitations at a non-uniform (rock and soil) site. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31:1261–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerva A, Zervas V (2002) Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: an overview. Appl Mech Rev ASME 55:271–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerva A, Ang AH-S, Wen YK (1986) Development of differential response spectra for lifeline seismic analysis. Probab Eng Mech 1:208–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all NERA partners who participated in the seismological experiment, especially Nikos Theodulidis, Giovanna Cultrera, Tobias Boxberger, and Tommy Andreou. Seismological data used in this paper have been acquired by using the stations from SISMOB which is a member of French Seismologic and Geodetic Network (RESIF—Réseau Sismologique et Géodésique Français). RESIF is a national Research Infrastructure recognized as such by the French Ministry of higher education and research. It is additionally supported by a public grant overseen by the French national research agency (ANR) as part of the “Investissements d’Avenir” program (reference: ANR-11-EQPX-0040) and the French Ministry of ecology, sustainable development and energy. The authors would like to take this opportunity to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their contributions in the review process of the article. The authors greatly appreciate the constructive suggestions and inspiring comments made by the reviewers, which have helped to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Seismic and Volcanic Risks Unit, Risks and Prevention Division, BRGM, F-45060, Orléans, France

    A. Imtiaz

  2. CNRS, IRD, IFSTTAR, ISTerre, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont-Blanc, CNRS, IRD, IFSTTAR, ISTerre, 38000, Grenoble, France

    A. Imtiaz, C. Cornou & P.-Y. Bard

  3. Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    A. Zerva

Authors
  1. A. Imtiaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Cornou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P.-Y. Bard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Zerva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Imtiaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imtiaz, A., Cornou, C., Bard, PY. et al. Effects of site geometry on short-distance spatial coherency in Argostoli, Greece. Bull Earthquake Eng 16, 1801–1827 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0270-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0270-z

Keywords