Abstract
The growing need in both producing renewable energy and food has led to the development of new systems such as agrivoltaic systems. Agrivoltaic systems, akin to agroforestry, integrate crop production in the understory with a photovoltaic overstory layer, casting spatial–temporal varying shades that can affect the yield of the understory crop by either improving or reducing crop growth underneath, depending on type of crop, pedoclimatic context, photovoltaic (PV) structure and its implementation design. Current studies on agrivoltaic arrays mainly evaluate global yield in areas under panels and in between panel and compare it to a control (ie. in full sun condition), and sometimes for various panels densities, but don’t consider shade gradients. The aim of this study was to assess field crops yields around high biaxial tracked PV installations, and correlate them with the spatial variations of shade, microclimate and soil parameters. This pattern was then used to simulate the crop yields under different designs. Two species of crops (wheat and maize) were monitored in 2022, 2023 and 2024, with a total of 44 trackers over 18 sites located in Western France. Received radiation (RR) appeared as the most impacting variable for both yield and biomass. Yields and biomass linearly decreased with decreasing RR, up to 45% and 40% respectively with a 50% RR decrease. However, relative maize biomass did not decrease much in 2022, probably due to an exceptionally hot summer. The simulated designs had Ground Coverage Ratios between 5 and 12% and induced limited global losses for both crops. Only the highest panel density with a Ground Coverage Ratio of 12% led to losses slightly greater than 10%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Adeh EH, Selker JS, Higgins CW (2018) Remarkable agrivoltaic influence on soil moisture, micrometeorology and water-use efficiency. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203256
AFNOR (2021) Label Projet Agrivoltaïque. Référentiel de labélisation des projets de classe A sur culture. Version 1.1. In: AFNOR (ed), p 37. https://certification.afnor.org/energie/label-agrivoltaique-positif. Accessed 15 Apr 2024
Amaducci S, Yin X, Colauzzi M (2018) Agrivoltaic systems to optimise land use for electric energy production. Appl Energy 220:545–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.081
Armstrong A, Ostle NJ, Whitaker J (2016) Solar park microclimate and vegetation management effects on grassland carbon cycling. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074016
Artru S, Garré S, Dupraz C, Hiel MP, Blitz-Frayret C, Lassois L (2017) Impact of spatio-temporal shade dynamics on wheat growth and yield, perspectives for temperate agroforestry. Eur J Agron 82:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.10.004
Baier C, Gross A, Thevs N, Glaser B (2023) Effects of agroforestry on grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.)—A global meta-analysis. Front Sustain Food Syst 7:1167686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1167686
Barron-Gafford GA, Minor RL, Allen NA, Cronin AD, Brooks AE, Pavao-Zuckerman MA (2016) The Photovoltaic Heat Island Effect: Larger solar power plants increase local temperatures. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/SREP35070
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Beed FD, Paveley ND, Sylvester-Bradley R (2007) Predictability of wheat growth and yield in light-limited conditions. J Agric Sci 145(1):63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859606006678
Dufour L, Metay A, Talbot G, Dupraz C (2013) Assessing light competition for cereal production in temperate agroforestry systems using experimentation and crop modelling. J Agron Crop Sci 199(3):217–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12008
Dupraz C (2024) Assessment of the ground coverage ratio of agrivoltaic systems as a proxy for potential crop productivity. Agroforest Syst 98:2679–2696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00906-3
Dupraz C, Marrou H, Talbot G, Dufour L, Nogier A, Ferard Y (2011) Combining solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimising land use: towards new agrivoltaic schemes. Renewable Energy 36(10):2725–2732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.03.005
Elamri Y, Cheviron B, Lopez JM, Dejean C, Belaud G (2018) Water budget and crop modelling for agrivoltaic systems: Application to irrigated lettuces. Agric Water Manag 208:440–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.001
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. (s.d.). Changes to the ECMWF model. ECMWF. https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/documentation-and-support/changes-ecmwf-model
FAO (2023) World food and agriculture – statistical yearbook 2023. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc8166en
Fischer RA (1985) Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. J Agric Sci 105(2):447–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600056495
République Française (2023) LOI n° 2023–175 du 10 mars 2023 relative à l'accélération de la production d'énergies renouvelables. J Off Répub Française, p 48. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/loi/2023/3/10/ENER2223572L/jo/texte
Global electricity consumption 2022 | Statista. (2023). Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/280704/world-power-consumption/
Gonocruz RA, Nakamura R, Yoshino K, Homma M, Doi T, Yoshida Y, Tani A (2021) Analysis of the rice yield under an agrivoltaic system: a case study in Japan. Environments 8(7):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8070065
Ivezic V, Yu Y, Werf W (2021) Crop yields in european agroforestry systems: a meta-analysis. Front Sustain Food Syst 5:606631. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.606631
Jacobs SR, Webber H, Niether W, Grahmann K, Lüttschwager D, Schwartz C, Breuer L, Bellingrath-Kimura SD (2022) Modification of the microclimate and water balance through the integration of trees into temperate cropping systems. Agric for Meteorol 323:109065. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2022.109065
Johansson T, McCormick K, Neij L, Turkenburg WC (2012) The potentials of renewable energy. Renewable energy: a global review of technologies, policies and markets. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849772341
Kanzler M, Böhm C, Mirck J, Schmitt D, Veste M (2019) Microclimate effects on evaporation and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield within a temperate agroforestry system. Agroforestry Syst 93(5):1821–1841. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10457-018-0289-4
Land use statistics and indicators Global, regional and country trends Land use statistics and indicators Global, regional and country trends 1990–2019 FAOSTAT Analytical Brief 28 LAND USE AND LAND USE INDICATORS BACKGROUND. (2019).
Laub M, Pataczek L, Feuerbacher A, Zikeli S, Högy P (2022) Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems: a meta-analysis. Abstr Agron Sustain Dev 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00783-7
Lewis NS, Nocera DG (2006) Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(43):15729–15735. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0603395103
Li H, Jiang D, Wollenweber B, Dai T, Cao W (2010) Effects of shading on morphology, physiology and grain yield of winter wheat. Eur J Agron 33(4):267–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.07.002
Marrou H, Guilioni L, Dufour L, Dupraz C, Wery J (2013) Microclimate under agrivoltaic systems: Is crop growth rate affected in the partial shade of solar panels? Agric for Meteorol 177:117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.012
McMaster GS, Morgan JA, Willis WO (1987) Effects of shading on winter wheat yield, spike characteristics, and carbohydrate allocation1. Crop Sci 27(5):967–973. https://doi.org/10.2135/CROPSCI1987.0011183X002700050030X
Mu H, Jiang D, Wollenweber B, Dai T, Jing Q, Cao W (2010) Long-term low radiation decreases leaf photosynthesis, photochemical efficiency and grain yield in winter wheat. J Agron Crop Sci 196(1):38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1439-037X.2009.00394.X
Noirot-Cosson PE, Riou T, Bugny Y (2022) Toward assessing photovoltaic trackers effects on annual crops growth and building optimized agrivoltaics systems based on annual crops. AIP Conf Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0103326/2830641
Ortiz-Bobea A, Ault TR, Carrillo CM, Chambers RG, Lobell DB (2021) Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth. Nat Clim Chang 11(4):306–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01000-1
Pataczek L, Weselek A, Bauerle A, Högy P, Lewandowski I, Zikeli S, Schweiger A (2023) Agrivoltaics mitigate drought effects in winter wheat. Physiol Plant 175(6):e14081. https://doi.org/10.1111/PPL.14081
Dal Prà A, Miglietta F, Genesio L, Lanini GM, Bozzi R, Morè N, Greco A, Fabbri MC (2024) Determination of feed yield and quality parameters of whole crop durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) biomass under agrivoltaic system. Agroforestry Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10457-024-00979-8/TABLES/2
Prakash V, Lunagaria MM, Trivedi AP, Upadhyaya A, Kumar R, Das A, Kumar Gupta A, Kumar Y (2023) Shading and PAR under different density agrivoltaic systems, their simulation and effect on wheat productivity. Europe J Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJA.2023.126922
R Core Team (2023). _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <https://www.R-project.org/>.
Ramos-Fuentes IA, Elamri Y, Cheviron B, Dejean C, Belaud G, Fumey D (2023) Effects of shade and deficit irrigation on maize growth and development in fixed and dynamic AgriVoltaic systems. Agric Water Manag 280:108187. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGWAT.2023.108187
Reher T, Lavaert C, Willockx B, Huyghe Y, Bisschop J, Martens JA, Diels J, Cappelle J, Van de Poel B (2024) Potential of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) production in vertical bifacial, tracked, or elevated agrivoltaic systems in Belgium. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122679
Savin R, Slafer GA (1991) Shading effects on the yield of an Argentinian wheat cultivar. J Agric Sci 116(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600076085
Weselek A, Ehmann A, Zikeli S, Lewandowski I, Schindele S, Högy P (2019). Agrophotovoltaic systems: applications, challenges, and opportunities. A review. In: Agronomy for sustainable development, vol 39, no 4. Springer-Verlag France. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0581-3
Weselek A, Bauerle A, Zikeli S, Lewandowski I, Högy P (2021) Effects on crop development, yields and chemical composition of celeriac (Apium graveolens L. var. rapaceum) cultivated underneath an agrivoltaic system. Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040733
Xu C (2016) Slight shading after anthesis increases photosynthetic productivity and grain yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) due to the delaying of leaf senescence. J Integrative Agricult 15(1):63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61047-4
Funding
This research was funded by the OKWIND group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: C.I, PE.NC, A.G, T.K; Data curation: C.I, T.R; Formal analysis: C.I; Investigation: C.I; Methodology: PE.NC, A.G, T.K; Project administration: C.I; Resources: C.I, PE.NC, A.G, T.K; Supervision: C.I, PE.NC, A.G, T.K; Visualization: C.I; Writing – original draft preparation: C.I; Writing – review & editing: C.I, PE.NC, A.G, T.K
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Inghels, C., Noirot-Cosson, PE., Riou, T. et al. Effect of high biaxial solar trackers on crop yield, application to different design simulations. Agroforest Syst 99, 48 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01144-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01144-5