[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Core Operational Business-IT Alignment: Current Trends and Open Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Systems Development

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 67))

  • 163 Accesses

Abstract

In terms of competitiveness, Business-IT Alignment (BITA) is still a crucial challenge for business leaders and CIOs, especially in the context of Digital Transformation and time-to-market challenges. Core Operational BITA is a projection of BITA to the Enterprise Information System perimeter, i.e., the operational alignment between the business processes and supporting IT. It is a major source of issues (e.g., strong couplings, maintenance costs, technical debt, slow adaptation). These issues cause a misalignment and thus contribute to the well-known Business-IT Gap. In this paper, we review the current state of this operational alignment in the context of Enterprise Architecture (EA) i.e. between the Business Process layer and the Application layer. Our analysis focuses on five facets: modelling notations used at the Business Process and Application layers, existence of explicit and implicit links between these layers, potential of these links in terms of alignment or misalignment in the information system, tooling and support. As a result, we notably outline some current limitations, such as modelling disparities, misuse of links between the two layers and an under-coverage of real alignment processes. We also discuss some lessons learned and future challenges, mainly around modelling needs and consistency management between the two considered layers for core operational BITA.

This paper is a revised and extended version of the ISD 2023 paper untitled “A Review of Core Operational Business-IT Alignment” [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.computerworld.com/article/2486278/it-management/how-to-balance-maintenance-and-it-innovation.html.

  2. 2.

    We do not consider industrial EA tools. See the Gartner peer review and rating for more insights—https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/enterprise-architecture-tools.

  3. 3.

    https://tinyurl.com/4eh3wdkc.

  4. 4.

    Horizontal links connect elements of the same layer.

  5. 5.

    Gartner Magic Quadrant for EA Tools https://tinyurl.com/gartnerMQ-EAT.

  6. 6.

    We also tried to access to these tools, without success.

  7. 7.

    http://www.ibm.com/industries/financialservices/iaa.

  8. 8.

    https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/034081.

  9. 9.

    We remind that purely commercial tools were not in the scope of this paper.

References

  1. André, P., Tamzalit, D., Benjilany, A., & Bruneliere, H. (2023). A review of core operational business-it alignment. In: ISD 2023 Proceedings (pp. 1–12). AIS eLibrary.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aversano, L., Grasso, C., & Tortorella, M. (2012). A literature review of business/it alignment strategies. Procedia Technology, 5, 462–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aversano, L., Grasso, C., & Tortorella, M. (2016). Managing the alignment between business processes and software systems. Information and Software Technology, 72, 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bass, L., Clements, P., & Kazman, R. (2003). Software architecture in practice. Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bruneliere, H., Cabot, J., Dupé, G., & Madiot, F. (2014). MoDisco: A model driven reverse engineering framework. Information and Software Technology, 56(8), 1012–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruneliere, H., Burger, E., Cabot, J., & Wimmer, M. (2019). A feature-based survey of model view approaches. Software and Systems Modeling, 18(3), 1931–1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Castellanos, C., & Correal, D. (2013). A framework for alignment of data and processes architectures applied in a government institution. Journal on Data Semantics, 2(2–3), 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, T., Barn, B. S., & Oussena, S. (2012). A method for enterprise architecture alignment. In: Proceedings of PRET (Vol. 120, pp. 48–76). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., & Yoffie, D. B. (2019). The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dahman, K., Charoy, F., & Godart, C. (2013). Alignment and change propagation between business processes and service-oriented architectures. In: IEEE SCC 2013, Santa Clara, CA, USA (pp. 168–175). IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Etien, A., & Rolland, C. (2005). Measuring the fitness relationship. Requirements Engineering, 10(3), 184–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fabra, J., de Castro, V., Álvarez, P., & Marcos, E. (2012). Automatic execution of business process models: Exploiting the benefits of model-driven engineering approaches. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(3), 607–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fritscher, B., & Pigneur, Y. (2011). Business IT alignment from business model to enterprise architecture. In: CAiSE 2011 Workshops, London, UK (pp. 4–15).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gellweiler, C. (2021). IT architects and it-business alignment: a theoretical review. In: CENTERIS 2021 - ProjMAN 2021 - HCist 2021, Braga, Portugal (Vol. 196, pp. 13–20). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gerow, J. E., Grover, V., Thatcher, J., & Roth, P. L. (2014). Looking toward the future of it–business strategic alignment through the past. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1159–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giese, H., & Wagner, R. (2008). From model transformation to incremental bidirectional model synchronization. Software & Systems Modeling, 8(1), 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gouigoux, J.-P., & Tamzalit, D. (2021). Business-it alignment anti-patterns: a thought from an empirical point of view. In: ISD 2021, Valencia, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Habba, M., Fredj, M., & Benabdellah Chaouni, S. (2019). Alignment between business requirement, business process, and software system: A systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering, 2019, 6918105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1999). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems, 38(2.3), 472–484.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesböck, F. (2020). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. In: Strategic information management (pp. 151–173). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kahre, C., Hoffmann, D., & Ahlemann, F. (2017). Beyond business-it alignment-digital business strategies as a paradigmatic shift: a review and research agenda. In: HICSS 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kassahun, A., & Tekinerdogan, B. (2016). Collaboration viewpoint for modeling cross-organizational business concerns. In: ICST 2016 (pp. 3–21). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kostic, Z. (2018). Innovation and digital transformation as a competition catalyst. Ekonomika, 64(1350-2019-2780), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lankhorst, M. M. (2013). Enterprise Architecture at Work - Modelling, Communication and Analysis (3rd ed.). The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pepin, J., André, P., Attiogbé, J. C., & Breton, E. (2015). A method for business-it alignment of legacy systems. In: ICEIS 2015, Barcelona, Spain (pp. 229–237). SciTePress.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pepin, J., André, P., Attiogbé, J. C., & Breton, E. (2016). An improved model facet method to support EA alignment. Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly, 9, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pereira, C. M., & Sousa, P. (2005). Enterprise architecture: business and it alignment. In: SAC 2005 (pp. 1344–1345).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pufahl, L., Zerbato, F., Weber, B., & Weber, I. (2022). Bpmn in healthcare: Challenges and best practices. Information Systems, 107, 102013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ralha, C. G., & Gostinski, R. (2008). A methodological framework for business-it alignment. In: C. Bartolini, et al. (Eds.), BDIM 2008, Salvador, Brazil (pp. 1–10). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Romero, D., & Vernadat, F. B. (2016). Enterprise information systems state of the art: Past, present and future trends. Computers in Industry, 79, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shishkov, B. (2020). Designing enterprise information systems - merging enterprise modeling and software specification. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Simonin, J., Nurcan, S., & Gourmelen, J. (2012). Weighted alignment measures of enterprise architecture viewpoints. In: CAiSE 2012 international workshops, Gdańsk, Poland (Vol. 112, pp. 592–599). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ullah, A., & Lai, R. (2013). A systematic review of business and information technology alignment. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 4(1), 4:1–4:30.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wagner, H., & Weitzel, T. (2006). Operational IT business alignment as the missing link from IT strategy to firm success. In: AMCIS 2006, Acapulco, Mexico (p. 74). AIS.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wieringa, R., Blanken, H., Fokkinga, M., & Grefen, P. (2003). Aligning application architecture to the business context. In: CAiSE’03, Klagenfurt, Austria (pp. 209–225). Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yeow, A., Soh, C., & Hansen, R. (2018). Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, M., Chen, H., & Luo, A. (2018). A systematic review of business-it alignment research with enterprise architecture. IEEE Access, 6, 18933–18944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao, X., & Zou, Y. (2011). A business process-driven approach for generating software modules. Software: Practice and Experience, 41(10), 1049–1071.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal André .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

André, P., Bruneliere, H., Tamzalit, D., Benjilany, A. (2024). Core Operational Business-IT Alignment: Current Trends and Open Challenges. In: Rodrigues da Silva, A., et al. Advances in Information Systems Development. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 67. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57189-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics