Pahles

Dit is de Euverlègk pagina van PAhles. Es te miech hei get vreugs, geef iech ouch hei antwoord.
De kins hei ouch terech veur vraoge/opmerkinge euver miene bot PahlesBot.

Please don't make translation requests. I will not fulfill them!

Es te miech get wèls zègke kins te hei klikke veur 'n nui oonderwerp aon te make. Of klik op 't 'plus'-teike bovenaon dees pagina.

Mien arsjief kins te hei vinde: t/m 2007, 2008, 2009 en 2010

Australië

Nein, dat móste v'r idd neet vergete. Probleem mèt die dinger is evels totste ze dèks zoe lesteg op einen daag kins plekke. 't Begint besjeie en pas later krijg 't catastrofaol proporties. En 't geit mer door, meh um noe edersdaags get te melle... Perceis zoeget had iech mèt Pakistan, de brand in Rusland en 't kindermisbruuk door preesters veureg jaor. Steinbach 4 jan 2011 11:17 (CET)

Klop, iech höb noe mer nao 'nen daag gezeuk boe NU.nl verwees. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 4 jan 2011 11:20 (CET)

File deletion warning

Please see: commons:User talk:Pahles#File deletion warning. Thank you. --Tomchen1989 10 jan 2011 05:08 (CET)

Sjablone

Daag Pahles, wieste gezeen höbs, haw iech miech de lèste daog bezeg mèt neet-bestoonde sjablone. Doa zien evels nog wel get roej links bij die oet dien coord-sjabloon koume. Aongezeen iech dat zelf neet gans begriep en 't dien idee waor, wèl iech vraoge ofste dao get vaan kins aofmake? Steinbach 21 jan 2011 10:37 (CET)

Iech zal dao de koumende tied 'ns nao goon loere! - Pahles | zègk 't mer 21 jan 2011 10:42 (CET)

Gebroeker:Mees12345

Dat is 'nen ingelogkde vandaol, die kinste rösteg veur ieweg blokkere. Dat is entans normaal beleid op nl:, en iech kin miech dao wel in vinde. Steinbach 15 fib 2011 12:29 (CET)

Euh...

 :-)   Wutsje 18 fib 2011 13:17 (CET)

Sorry!!!! Moet weer goed zijn zo. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 18 fib 2011 13:20 (CET)

Geeft niet hoor, we klikken allemaal wel es verkeerd. Ik moest alleen wel lachen toen ik dit zag:

[13:16:34] <CVNBot6> Added: Wutsje]] is on global blacklist, added by Pahles until 12:16, 28 February 2011 ("Autoblacklist: Pazjena's leeghole on li.wikipedia")

Groet, Wutsje 18 fib 2011 13:22 (CET)

Ik was gewoon te snel en lette niet op. Bedankt overigens voor het opletten hier! - Pahles | zègk 't mer 18 fib 2011 13:24 (CET)

Bevolkingsdeechde Nederland

Hei in Nederland höbbe v'r nogal väöl water, >18% wie in 't artikel steit. Iech dink tot 't versjèl ziech liet verkloare oet 't al of neet mètrekene daovaan. Steinbach 20 fib 2011 14:43 (CET)

Klop inderdaad. Mer aongezeen alle groete Wiki's gewoen 't totaol oppervlak rekene (dus inclusief 't water) en ze dus allemaol roond de 400/km² oetkoume, dink iech tot veer dat ouch mote doen. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 21 fib 2011 16:07 (CET)

Toesje

...steit gewoen in de NMD es vertaoling vaan 'ruilen'. Neve ruile, dat wel. Steinbach 21 mrt 2011 13:08 (CET)

Dat wis iech daan weer neet, iech had evels gezeuk bij "verwisselen" (NL) in d'n Digi-Dictionair en dee kós dat neet. Zoe liers te ederen daag get nuits. Iech höb 't nog noets gehuurd, en ierlek gezag dink iech tot neet väöl lui 't (nog) gebruke ('t klink miech erg awwerwèts in mien oere). - Pahles | zègk 't mer 21 mrt 2011 15:59 (CET)

Space Shuttle

Daag Pahles, iech had zoe 'n idee. 't Artikel Space Shuttle is nog neet zoe laank, meh de bis wel umeer enthousias bezeg aon artikele euver inkel missies en väöl aander gelieerde artikele bestoon ouch al. Zouw 't 'n idee zien veur 't artikel oet te bouwe tot staar-artikel? Daan kin 't op de veurpaasj weure gelink es strak 't Space Shuttle-program op zien ind löp. Dat is pas in juli, dus dao is nog wel eve tied veur. En natuurlek wèl iech ouch wel e deil vaan zoe projek veur mien rekening numme. Steinbach 4 jun 2011 18:47 (CEST)

Iech wèl dao zeker wel aon mètwèrke. Iech höb 't artikel zjus eve geleze, mer iech bin neet gelökkeg demèt, 't ligk allemaol get doorein. Iech zal iers 'ns naodinke euver 'n indeiling. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 4 jun 2011 21:08 (CEST)

Iech höb nog 'ns naogedach heieuver, mer iech dink neet tot 't artikel Space Shuttle ziech lient veur dit idee. Iech gaon 'n artikel aonmake geneump Spaceshuttleprogram, wat ouch mier ingeit op de gesjiedenis enzoe. 't Is tenslotte 't program wat oetsjeit, neet de Space Shuttle zelf.- Pahles | zègk 't mer 10 jun 2011 22:28 (CEST)

Oonzin vaan dee MAVO in Remun

Iech höb mer eve de ganse range twie weke geblokkeerd, de kins aanders wel bezeg blieve. Steinbach 17 jun 2011 13:09 (CEST)

Prima! - Pahles | zègk 't mer 17 jun 2011 13:11 (CEST)

Anglicisme

Wie kumstiech dao zoe bij? Iech höb gewoen 't woordgebruuk vaan de Winkler Prins euvergenome. administratie veur regering, dat is 'n anglicisme, meh 'n indeiling um 't land op orde te kinne hawwe weurt al 'n iewegheid zoe geneump. Steinbach 11 jul 2011 10:22 (CEST)

Iech mein dat örges geleze te höbbe (volges miech op de NL wiki). Toch liek miech bestuurlek beter es administratief, zoewies te zelf al zègks: e land weurt geregeerd door e bestuur, neet door 'n administratie. Es 't diech niks oetmaak zouw iech dus liever bestuurlek gebruke. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 11 jul 2011 12:26 (CEST)

Ich bön 't mit Pahles ins. Administratief deit drek dinken aan administratieve kosten. --OosWesThoesBes 11 jul 2011 20:03 (CEST)

Meh es 't neet fout is, heet edere gebruker de vrijheid 't woord te gebruke wat 'r priffereert. Es iemes ölger sjrief, gaon iech dao neet örgel vaan make umtot iech dat zelf zègk. Steinbach 11 jul 2011 20:48 (CEST)

Woorden.org zaet det 't in dees beteikenis Zuid-Nederlands is (zèk dus meh gerös Vlaams). --OosWesThoesBes 12 jul 2011 12:48 (CEST)

Mestreech, op dezelfde breiddegraod es Breusel en Duinkerke, inkel kilometers vaan de taolgrens aof en ouch nog ins aon drei kante door 't Belsj umgeve, kin wel geach te hure tot 't Zuid-Nederlands taolgebeed. Es oondersteuning kin iech aanders wel 'n waslies aon gemein wäörd en gallicismes opveure. Steinbach 12 jul 2011 13:17 (CEST)

't Einege wat iech kin aondrage is dit (zuug twiede veurbeeld). - Pahles | zègk 't mer 12 jul 2011 13:24 (CEST)

E jungske

Wie dèks höbstiech bij Juanes geloerd wat 'r waor :p? Steinbach 26 jul 2011 10:11 (CEST)

Nou, 't is aon z'ne kop wel te zien, dach iech zoe ;) - Pahles | zègk 't mer 26 jul 2011 10:26 (CEST)

Zierikzee

Kins dich zeen of ik ut good hub gedaon?? Stijnsation 7 sep 2011 22:07 (CEST)

Iech weit neet good watste bedoels? Wat bedoelste mèt "ut"? Euveriges sjrieve v'r 't, dus zoonder de u. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 7 sep 2011 22:58 (CEST)

Burrunantoemeleer

Zitte v'r wezelek perceis tegeliek dezelfde informatie te verwèrke :p Steinbach 15 sep 2011 11:31 (CEST)

good toch? ;) - Pahles | zègk 't mer 15 sep 2011 11:42 (CEST)

Charlotte's Web (1973)

Hi, I wanted to add to this page, it's too short in my opionion. Do you know where I can request a translation from the Dutch or English Wikipedias? Charlotte 2011 27 sep 2011 13:44 (CEST)

I'm sorry, we don't do translation requests. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 27 sep 2011 13:51 (CEST)

There's no page for volunteer translators? If that's true, then how do pages get expanded? Do you have to have someone interested in the topic? Charlotte 2011 28 sep 2011 01:27 (CEST)

Again, we don't do translation request, see the top of this page, and the top of our village pump page. We are only a very small group of contributors and don't have the time for (mostly) fan based requests. Articles about movies, small villages in Poland or Russia and the likes are (at the moment) of no interest to us or the readers of the Limburgian Wikipedia. Please refrain from further requesting translations or contributing in literally translated Dutch or English text. Limburgish is not easy for non-Limburgians, meaning we have to correct your contribution just to get it to comply to our standards, taking away time doing more meaningful stuff here. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 28 sep 2011 11:37 (CEST)

Nordelik

Jao, is mich good, mar zal ich alles dan umzette naor NORdelik?? Alles?? Stijnsation 3 okt 2011 14:03 (CEST)

Iech zègk neet totsdiech get mós wijzege. Boe 't um geit is tot 't neet consequent liek. Iech weit neet wat good Vinloos is, iech hoop totsdiech dat beter wèts. Is 't Noerdelik of Nordelik (of mesjiens wel Noordelik)?

't Is euveriges gewoen um antwoord te geve op de pagina boe de vraog gestèld weurt, in dit geval dien eige euverlègk-pagina... Daan blijf vraog en antwoord bij-ein. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 3 okt 2011 14:14 (CEST)

Ok, dan is dit de letste kier um 't aaf te liere. Officieel is 't volgesmich gewoeën NORdelik, dus ik gaon now alles umzette. Stijnsation 3 okt 2011 18:30 (CEST)

Pagina's

Boe höbbe v'r dat daan aofgesproke? En boeveur zouw dat dan euveral mote stoon? ⵙⵜⴰⵢⵏⴱⴰⵅ 14 okt 2011 12:44 (CEST)

Hei: http://li.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_kaffee/Arsjief120210#vertaolinge_systeemberiechte_en_.27n_vraog_of_2. Boerum zouw 't neet euveral mote stoon? Blaojer waor zoe wie zoe gei Limburgs, daan zouw 't blajer mote zien (neet allein in 't Mestreechs). - Pahles | zègk 't mer 14 okt 2011 12:51 (CEST)

Sjwerdes

Daag Pahles, höbste 't artikel daan wel verplaots nao de Wiktionair? Dat liek m'ch wel fair in zoe geval. En daan natuurlek ouch de sjriever eve opmerkzaam make, tot 'r neet dink vaan 'daon iech 't daoveur'? ⵙⵜⴰⵢⵏⴱⴰⵅ 27 nov 2011 20:55 (CET)

Sorry, mer dat verplaotse geit miech get te wied. Iech bin mèt opzat neet actief op de Wiktionair. Iech wèl wel de sjrijver eve aonsjrieve uiteraard. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 27 nov 2011 22:44 (CET)

Waar dit "'s werdes" ('s werkdaags; dore waek) of get anges? --OosWesThoesBes 28 nov 2011 07:01 (CET)

Sorry, iech begriep de vraog neet. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 28 nov 2011 10:58 (CET)

@Pahles: Owtb wèlt 't zelf op de Wiktionair aonmake en vreug noe of d'n inhaajd vaan 't artikel euvereinstump mèt wat heer dink. @Owtb: Jao, dat waor 't, en de mins gaof es specifiek veurbeeld: sjwerdese kleier. ⵙⵜⴰⵢⵏⴱⴰⵅ 28 nov 2011 11:31 (CET)

OK, den gaon v'r d'r 'ns get wèrk van make. --OosWesThoesBes 28 nov 2011 18:33 (CET)

Forced user renames coming soon for SUL

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 3 mei 2013 18:50 (CEST)

Forced user renames coming soon for SUL

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 3 mei 2013 18:50 (CEST)

Kumps de weer?

Hoi Pahles! Wie geit 't mèt uuch? Iech zaw 't oontzèttend leuk vinde es g'r weer 's langskump op dizze wikipedia! V'r höbbe uuch toch e bitteke nudeg!--Ortjens (euverlègk) 11 mei 2013 12:35 (CEST)

Categorie:Werk in oetveuring

Daag Pahles,

Twie'nhaaf jaor geleie biste eweggegoon. Um miech jao, iech weit 't. Intösse liekent de ganse gróp te zien weggeloupe. Wee wèt ouch wel um miech, meh dat zègke ze neet debij. Toch höb iech ummer gehoop totste ins zouws trökkoume, al waor 't mer um dat 'veurluipeg' op dien gebrukerspaasj.
Wie daan ouch, iech maak miech nog zörg euver get aanders. Veer höbbe allemaol jaorelaank artikele aongemaak die noets zien veerdeg gekoume en noe al jaorelaank haaf aofgemaak op hun oteurs te wachte ligke. Dat is noets de bedoeling vaan die categorie gewees en 't is ouch gein reclaam veur 't projek. Zelf bin iech begós mèt 't aofmake vaan mien artikele (boevaan eint al ach jaor op voltoejing wachde!) en dat bevèlt miech zier good. Zouw 't mesjiens 'n idee zien um dat ouch te doen? In die geval geit 't um de artikele Apollo-program, Evolutie, G-klasse staar, Antoni Gaudí, ISO 3166-1, Mars Science Laboratory, Ruimtetoerisme, Sintervaoskèrk, Spaceshuttleprogram, Staar, STS-135 en Universum.
Desnoeds wèl iech zelf wel vertrèkke, es de Limbörgse Wikipedia diech daomèt trökkrijg. Steinbach (euverlègk) 26 mrt 2014 18:17 (CET)

MediaWiki talk:Licenses

All ok then? Nemo bis (euverlègk) 2 jul 2014 14:46 (CEST)

Your admin status

Hello. I'm a steward. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc.) was adopted by community consensus recently. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on wikis with no inactivity policy.   You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for 2 years) on liwiki, where you are a bureaucrat and administrator. Since that wiki does not have its own administrators' rights review process, the global one applies.   If you want to keep your rights, you should inform the community of the wiki about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. If the community has a discussion about it and then wants you to keep your rights, please contact the stewards at m:Stewards' noticeboard, and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights, and demonstrate a continued requirement to maintain these rights.   We stewards will evaluate the responses. If there is no response at all after approximately one month, we will proceed to remove your administrative rights. In cases of doubt, we will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact us on m:Stewards' noticeboard.   Best regards, Rschen7754 17 aug 2014 23:30 (CEST)

An important message about renaming users

Dear Pahles, My aplogies for writing in English. Please translate or have this translated for you if it will help. I am cross-posting this message to many places to make sure everyone who is a Wikimedia Foundation project bureaucrat receives a copy. If you are a bureaucrat on more than one wiki, you will receive this message on each wiki where you are a bureaucrat.

As you may have seen, work to perform the Wikimedia cluster-wide single-user login finalisation (SUL finalisation) is taking place. This may potentially effect your work as a local bureaucrat, so please read this message carefully.

Why is this happening? As currently stated at the global rename policy, a global account is a name linked to a single user across all Wikimedia wikis, with local accounts unified into a global collection. Previously, the only way to rename a unified user was to individually rename every local account. This was an extremely difficult and time-consuming task, both for stewards and for the users who had to initiate discussions with local bureaucrats (who perform local renames to date) on every wiki with available bureaucrats. The process took a very long time, since it's difficult to coordinate crosswiki renames among the projects and bureaucrats involved in individual projects.

The SUL finalisation will be taking place in stages, and one of the first stages will be to turn off Special:RenameUser locally. This needs to be done as soon as possible, on advice and input from Stewards and engineers for the project, so that no more accounts that are unified globally are broken by a local rename to usurp the global account name. Once this is done, the process of global name unification can begin. The date that has been chosen to turn off local renaming and shift over to entirely global renaming is 15 September 2014, or three weeks time from now. In place of local renames is a new tool, hosted on Meta, that allows for global renames on all wikis where the name is not registered will be deployed.

Your help is greatly needed during this process and going forward in the future if, as a bureaucrat, renaming users is something that you do or have an interest in participating in. The Wikimedia Stewards have set up, and are in charge of, a new community usergroup on Meta in order to share knowledge and work together on renaming accounts globally, called Global renamers. Stewards are in the process of creating documentation to help global renamers to get used to and learn more about global accounts and tools and Meta in general as well as the application format. As transparency is a valuable thing in our movement, the Stewards would like to have at least a brief public application period. If you are an experienced renamer as a local bureaucrat, the process of becoming a part of this group could take as little as 24 hours to complete. You, as a bureaucrat, should be able to apply for the global renamer right on Meta by the requests for global permissions page on 1 September, a week from now.

In the meantime please update your local page where users request renames to reflect this move to global renaming, and if there is a rename request and the user has edited more than one wiki with the name, please send them to the request page for a global rename.

Stewards greatly appreciate the trust local communities have in you and want to make this transition as easy as possible so that the two groups can start working together to ensure everyone has a unique login identity across Wikimedia projects. Completing this project will allow for long-desired universal tools like a global watchlist, global notifications and many, many more features to make work easier.

If you have any questions, comments or concerns about the SUL finalisation, read over the Help:Unified login page on Meta and leave a note on the talk page there, or on the talk page for global renamers. You can also contact me on my talk page on meta if you would like. I'm working as a bridge between Wikimedia Foundation Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Stewards, and you to assure that SUL finalisation goes as smoothly as possible; this is a community-driven process and I encourage you to work with the Stewards for our communities.

Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) talk 25 aug 2014 20:24 (CEST)

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

Maurizo Malvestiti

Good morning from Italy, dear Pahles, how are you?

I need your help: I've made this page but I've put a wrong name. Please, can you write for me Maurizio Malvestiti?

Thanks a lot for your porecious help!

Rei Momo (euverlègk) 3 sep 2014 12:09 (CEST)

API change will break your script

I noticed that you (not PahlesBot, but your account) were using http:// to access the API last week, rather than https:// This is going to break soon, because of changes to the API. You can find more information in this e-mail message. If you need help updating your code to use https:// , then you might be able to find some help at w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard, on the mailing list, or at phab:T136674. Good luck, Whatamidoing (WMF) (euverlègk) 25 jun 2016 22:27 (CEST)

Juno

Daag Pahles, good totste weer actief bis. Wat meinste feitelek mèt tot de Juno "technisch" gistere bij Jupiter aonkaom? Volgens en:Juno (spacecraft) kaom 't dink tösse 3:18 en 3:53 Wereldtied bij Jupiter aon. Bij us waor 't toen al tösse vief en zès 's mörges. De zouws nog kinne zègke tot 't bij de NASA op de groond nog 4 juli waor, meh iech dink tot 't aonhawwe vaan d'n Amerikaansen tied geine zin heet veur dinger die ziech in de ruimde aofspeule. Iech zègk neet totste oongeliek höbs, meh iech huur wel gere boeveurste dao eventueel aanders euver dinks. Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 5 jul 2016 12:25 (CEST)

De höbs geliek, iech pas 't weer aon. Iech leet miech get mètsleipe... ;) -- Pahles | zègk 't mer 5 jul 2016 13:00 (CEST)

Ich sloet mich bie Steinbach aan. Fijn óm dich weer trögk te zeen! :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 5 jul 2016 13:07 (CEST)

Ein(e) vaan

Hoi Pahles. Iech zeen tot geer väöl höb gecorrigeerd in mien artikele roontelum de kring en gemeintes vaan Noordrien-Wesfale. Mienen daank daoveur. Iech höb miene prototeks veur dees categorie artikele veraanderd zoetot iech de fout neet weer maak. Evels höb iech wel ei vräögske: geer corrigeerde ouch "eine vaan de kring" in "ein vaan de kring". Mót 't neet eine zien umtot 't riffereerd nao e mannelek woord, naomelek 'ne krink? Zoewiet iech weit mót me toch ouch "eine vaan de manslui", "ein vaan de vrouwlui" en "ei vaan de kinder" zigke? Iech huur gere vaan uuch, want de Mestreechter Taol website heet gei riechteg antwoord dao-op. Dee website geef wel antwoord op wie de tèlwäörd gehanteerd mótte weure (loer hei), mer mesjiens höb geer toch geliek; 't zou zoemeh kinne tot de tèlwäörd ziech neet verbuige es nao e woord verweze weurt zoonder direk d'r veur te staon. Toch zouw iech dat e bitsje vreemp vinde, aongezeen dat neet gebrukelek is in aander naoberse taole, wie Frans en Duits... --Zeiverklaos (euverlègk) 16 aug 2016 11:17 (CEST)

In 't Midde-Limbörgs verbuge ze dao van aadshaer oet waal, mer ónger invlood van 't Nederlandjs huuertj me allewiel "ein van die men" etc. ouch väöl. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 16 aug 2016 13:45 (CEST)

Tjeh, dao zëgks te m'ch get. Manslui en vrouwlui zien wäörd zoonder inkelvoud (ze bestoon allein mer es miervoud), dus die vergelieking geit neet op. Miech kloonk eine vaan de kring gewoen neet good in de oere. Daorum höb iech 't aongepas. Mer iech kin miech vergisse. Mesjiens beejt iemes aanders oetsluutsel. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 16 aug 2016 16:09 (CEST)

Laote veer 't veural neet euver 't neerlandisme in 't Limbörgs höbbe, OWTB. Daan zouw me ouch "'n maan" en "omdat" oondertösse mótte gaon goodrekene ;) Wijer zouw iech miech wille aofvraoge of "manslui" toch e good veurbeeld is. Is manslui neet de einegste riechteg miervoudsvörm veur 'ne maan? In dat geval is 't vergeliekbaar mèt 't "krink"-veurbeeld. Wie daan ouch, iech gaon d'rs nog 's good nao zeuke en sjik Mestreechter Taol mörge ouch meh 's e mailke - al zien die neet altied eve betrouwbaar wat betröf 't verwachte vaan e mailke trök. Zoelaank iech niks vin wat mien grammair tegesprik blijf iech toch meh die zin hantere. Nömp neet weg tot die correctie vaan diech in de aander artikele kin blieve staon zoelaank de oplossing duuster blijf.--188.123.252.213 16 aug 2016 23:51 (CEST)

't Inkelvoud van de mansluuj is d'r maan; van de vróluuj is de vrów; zjuus wie d'r wèrkmaan en de wèrkvrów 't inkelvoud is van de wèrkluj. Dus eine van de mansluuj; ing van de vróluuj. En inge van de kringe want d'r kreenk. D'r twiefel bie Pahles kan kaome dör 't feit dat me in Mestreech de maan en de krink zaet en 't geslach inkel nog te hure is in eine maan, eine krink. Me zaet in Norbik waal 'Ing van dis daag' terwiel d'r daag mannelek is. Dit is 'n oetzeundering want 'n vaste oetdrukking.--Mergelsberg (euverlègk) 17 aug 2016 08:06 (CEST)

't Miervoud vaan maan is maan in 't Mestreechs (eine maan, twie maan), volgens Mestreechter Taol, en neet manslui. Zeuks te op mannen in 't Nederlands, aan vins te manslui, mer eve later in e veurbeeld weurt ouch gesproke euver manne (Allewijl wèrke väöl manne mèt in 't hoeshawwe, boe iech manslui zou gebruke). Dao steit gein vermelding vaan 'n inkelvoud vaan manslui. Ouch veer zègke ein vaan dees daog euveriges, mesjiens kump miene twiefel wel dao door. Door dees discussie dink iech evels tot Zeiverklaos geliek heet en 't toch eine vaan de kring moot zien. Iech zal 't ein en aander aonpasse mèt miene bot. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 17 aug 2016 09:49 (CEST)

Terzijde: In 't Norbiks kin 'ch ooch maan es mv van maan mae waal eenkel in de betekenis van NL persoon. 'Ene maan is genóg' en 'v'r geunt mèt driej maan'. Ooch in het NL is timmerman inkelvoud van timmerlieden/ zeeman-zeelui/werkvrouw-werklieden. Manne en vrówwe kin v'r in Norbik ooch es mv, mae die vorm is nujer es de vorm mit luuj. Luuj in de betekenis van NL mensen is an 't verdwijne. 'En de luuj gónge de sjtraot óp' wert da bv 'Edereen góng enz' Me keest dus nog neet direc vör de vorm miensje in dae kontekst. In Zittert haat 't 'n vereniging die 'De mander' heesjt. Mander is ooch 'n mv van maan, mae alling in de een goedgemutste mae toch 'n ietwat geringschattende connotatie. 'Dat zeunt mich mander'--Mergelsberg (euverlègk) 17 aug 2016 12:44 (CEST)

Op 't Mofers zaet me den juus eine man/miens, twieë men; ein vrouw, twieë vrólje. mander beteikentj bie ós e klei jungske :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 17 aug 2016 13:49 (CEST)

doorsnoje/doorsnooje

Nao aanleijing van [1]: Mestreechtertaol.nl guuef waal "gesnooje" mit twieë o's aan. --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 25 aug 2016 20:51 (CEST)

De höbs geliek, iech höb 't weer aongepas. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 25 aug 2016 21:02 (CEST)

Mie(r) es

Daag Pahles, iech zeen totste diene bot opdrach höbs gegeve euveral boe iech (of iemes aanders) mier es heet gesjreve, dat is mie es te veraandere. Dat vin iech noe neet nujeg. Volgens de NMB is mier (neve mie) gewoen good Mestreechs. Daobij kump de combinatie mier es dèks genoog veur, in eder geval in gesjreve tekste (geef miech 'nen daag en iech kin diech zoe get veurbeelder citere). Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 29 aug 2016 23:50 (CEST)

Tjeh, iech bin hei aofgegaange op Endepols en op Mestreechtertoal.nl, bei geven mie of miejer. En iech geef tow, iech zègk zelf ouch wel mier, mer dat liek miech mie 'n sametrèkking vaan miejer. Iech wèl 't wel wijzege nao miejer es te meins tot dat beter is. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 30 aug 2016 14:59 (CEST)

Arrondisseminte, kantons, gemeintes

Daag Pahles, iech weit neet of 't zoe slum is um die links eweg te hole. Diech geis die lieste of de dao-in geneumde artikele mesjiens neet aonmake, meh iemes aander moot die kans wel höbbe. 'n Artikel mèt väöl roej links neujt mie tot zelf sjrieve oet es 'n artikel wat doedlöp. Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 6 sep 2016 23:56 (CEST)

Iech dink neet tot 't oetnudeg tot sjrieve es 'n link nao 'n nog neet bestaond artikel besteit euver mie es 5000 (!) gemeintes in de regio Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Lorraine. Die gemeintes koume wel trök in artikele euver de departeminte (zuug Lies van gemeintes in Ardennes). Los daovaan, 't waor wel 'ne link, mer neet in de loupende teks, en 't is neet mie es 'n getal, wat bekans neet opvèlt. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 7 sep 2016 07:47 (CEST)

Minse...

...is welzeker Mestreechs. Steit gewoen in de NMD es miervoud vaan mins. Iech weit wel tot me hiel dèks lui zeet es 't euver mie es eine mins geit, meh soms kin dat gewoen neet. Homo habilis, Homo erectus en Homo sapiens, dat zien toch neet drei 'lui'? Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 10 okt 2016 15:05 (CEST)

Dat zien zeker neet drei 'lui', dat klop. Mer Homo habilis, Homo erectus en Homo sapiens zien 'soorte' lui, neet zoemer lui. Iech bin neet in 't bezit van de NMD, dus iech verlaot miech op Mestreechtertaol.nl, en die geve gein miervoud bij mins (zuug hei). En es Mestreechteneer zeende loupe miech altied de sjevraoje langs miene rögkestraank es iech iemes 'minse' huur zègke. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 10 okt 2016 17:06 (CEST)

Iech beperk 't ouch tot 't minste, meh soorte lui in dit verband vin iech wel hendeg umslechteg. De moos wel verstoon tot v'r 't in 't Limbörgs gemeinelek allein euver alledaogse dinger höbbe. Wetensjappeleke tekste in 't plat zalle ummer e bitteke oonnatuurlek aondoen. Kwestie vaan wènne en de gouwe middeweeg vinde. Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 10 okt 2016 18:39 (CEST)

Iech höb Endepols nog 'ns drop naogeloerd en dee zeet wel minse. Vreemp tot Mestreechtertaol dat daan neet zeet. Iech zal 't artikel trök aonpasse.- Pahles | zègk 't mer 10 okt 2016 20:11 (CEST)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 13 jan 2017 23:23 (CET)

Transliteratie

Daag Pahles, de vreugs diech aof boeveur iech 'n bepaolde transcriptie vaan 't Arabisch höb gebruuk. Nou, dat is sumpel: umtot die de Nederlandse oetspraokregele volg. Boeveur zouwe v'r per se 'n u mote sjrieve in naome oet 'n taol die e gans aander sjrif gebruuk? Bij 't Japans kin iech miech zoeget veurstèlle: dao is ei speciaol systeem wat universeel gebruuk weurt, good leus en ouch wetensjappelek vaan pas kump. Veur 't Arabisch gelt dat neet. Dao weurt vaan alles doorein gebruuk. De wetensjappeleke transliteratie is DIN 31635, meh veur neet-specialistisch gebruuk is dat neet te doen. Daorum hanteerde iech miech hei de Nederlandse transcriptie. Es tiech dat neet wèls, daan veulste de vraog aonkoume: wie moot 't daan wel? Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 30 jan 2017 19:53 (CET)

Iech höb hielemaol neet zoeväöl verstand heivaan, mer boerum zouwe veer 'n oe sjrieve in de naom vaan deen ierste president es te wel Abu Dhabi en Dubai sjrijfs? Daan moos te ouch consequent zien en 't euveral doen. En es te daan 'ne naom sjrijfs (de lèste president) daan moos te 't neet op 'n aander meneer doen in de infobox. Iech bin noe zelf aofgegaange op de spelling die gebruuk is op de NL wiki euveriges. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 30 jan 2017 22:06 (CET)

Dat klop, v'r sjrieve wel Dubai. Ierlek gezag ouch mer veural umtot iech hei al jaore neet oetkom. Hei kinste zien tot dat probleem neet ech oet de loch kump valle: me kin Arabische naome soms op wel tientalle versjèllende menere sjrieve. Mesjiens gaon iech uuch in de Kaffee nog wel ins vervele mèt e veurstèl veur 'n einvörmege sjriefwijs. Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 30 jan 2017 23:44 (CET)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in English)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 23 fib 2017 09:09 (CET)

Bleumkes

Ha, ich vroog mich aaf ofs doe mesjiens wèts wie det dit bieësjke zich neump op 't Mestreechs. Ich höb daoveur gezóch, mer ich kós 't neet vinje :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 25 jun 2017 11:11 (CEST)

Op 't Hollands sprik me ouch vaan weegbree, mien ierste idee zouw zien um dat plentsje ouch zoe te neume, of entans vaan weegbrei te spreke. Stadsdialekte höbbe, wieste diech kins veurstèlle, e. 't a. minder speciaol wäörd veur plentsjes es plattelandsdialekte. Mesjiens heet 't dink wel 'ne Valkebergse naom; Aelske is dao bès good in. :) Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 25 jun 2017 12:38 (CEST)

't Valkebergs woor ich al achter. Det woor namelik waegtrae :) --OosWesThoesBes (euverlègk) 25 jun 2017 12:40 (CEST)

Iech bin neet op de huugde of 't 'ne Mestreechsen naom gief. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 26 jun 2017 07:49 (CEST)

Iech vermoed dat ze in Mestreech gewoon weegbree zègke (of onkroed ;)). Trouwens in Valkeberg zaet ouch bekans nemes (miè) waegtrae--Aelske (euverlègk) 5 jul 2017 20:05 (CEST)

Ummezus

...beteikent 'tevergeefs' (wie in 't Duits umsonst). Meh nao eve naoloere zaog iech 't idd neet in de NMD stoon, en in Salemans & Aarts (2002) stoont 't in e blökske mèt verawwerde wäörd. Mesjiens kin iech die wäörd beter neet gebruke, meh ofste zoe'n wäörd moos weghole weit iech ouch neet zoe zeker ('t is jummers wel good Mestreechs). Steinbach Maak de wereld sjoender, besjrijf häöm op Wikipedia! 20 sep 2017 22:35 (CEST)

't steit inderdaad in Endepols, zeen iech zjus. Mestreechtertaol kint 't neet (en NMD ouch neet zègks diech ouch). Mestreechtertaol gief 'vergees' veur 'tevergeefs', dus iech höb dat noe debij gezat. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 20 sep 2017 22:46 (CEST)

Universal Code of Conduct

Hi Pahles

I was asked by Wikimedia Foundation to promote this call for participation on the planned Universal Code of Conduct.

Best regards --Holder (euverlègk) 12 aug 2020 14:17 (CEST)

Wikimediavrijwilligers werken nu al meer dan 18 jaar samen om de grootste verzameling vrije kennis sinds mensenheugenis te bouwen. In die tijd zijn we gegroeid van een kleine groep bewerkers tot een diverse gemeenschap van bewerkers, ontwikkelaars, Wikimedia-organisaties, lezers, donateurs en partners.

Maar we beseffen dat we nog veel werk moeten verzetten om onze ambitieuze visie te verwezenlijken: Stel je een wereld voor waarin elke persoon vrije toegang heeft tot een overzicht van alle kennis.

Soms hebben onze projecten en de gemeenschap van bijdragers geleden aan een gebrek aan richtlijnen die ons allen verbinden en die ons helpen om samen een omgeving te creëren waarin vrije kennis veilig, en zonder angst, gedeeld kan worden. Om dichter bij die visie te komen, moeten we ervoor zorgen dat iedereen die belangrijke kennis op onze projecten wil delen, zich prettig en welkom voelt. We hebben richtlijnen nodig die ons kunnen helpen om een constructieve en inclusieve plek te bouwen die aanmoedigt om vrije kennis te delen.

Verschillende gemeenschappen hebben het al eerder gehad over de nood aan universele gedragsregels. In mei 2020 heeft het bestuur van de Wikimedia Foundation een ‘Community Culture Statement’ gepubliceerd, dat de expliciete opdracht geeft om te werken aan nieuwe standaarden om om te gaan met intimidatie en om inclusiviteit in onze projecten te bevorderen. [2]

Deze universele gedragsregels zullen een aantal bindende, minimale standaarden bevatten die gelden voor alle Wikimediaprojecten, voor ieder van ons, voor medewerkers en vrijwilligers over heel de wereld. Dit zal impact hebben op ons werk als groepen, individuen en projecten, en het is dus cruciaal dat we allen deelnemen en onze mening delen over de universele gedragsregels, over hun aard, over wat deze gedragsregels horen te dekken en wat niet; en ook hoe dit onze groepen kan helpen, stimuleren of hinderen.

Nu is het moment om hierover te praten. Jullie gemeenschap is een deel van de Wikimediabeweging en jouw stem telt. Om te garanderen dat de stem van jullie gemeenschap gehoord wordt, nodigen we je uit om meer te lezen over de universele gedragsregels (universal code of conduct / UCoC) [3] en om vervolgens je mening en feedback te delen op de overlegpagina [4]. Voor meer flexibiliteit en om de taalbarrière te verkleinen: je bent van harte welkom om de Engelstalige hoofdpagina over de universele gedragsregels te vertalen naar je eigen taal [5]. Vervolgens kan jijzelf en je gemeenschap ervoor kiezen om meningen en feedback aan te bieden in je eigen taal. Bovendien: ook als de informatie over de universele gedragsregels nog niet vertaald is in je eigen taal, dan verwelkomen we antwoorden en reacties in verschillende talen bij discussiedraadjes die begonnen zijn in het Engels.

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

4 jan 2022 19:17 (CET)