- School of Sport and Exercise Sciences
University of Kent
Medway Building
Chatham Maritime
Kent ME4 4AG
UK - +44 (0) 1634 888805
Karen Hambly
University of Kent, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Faculty Member
- Orthopedic Surgery, Allied Health Sciences, Injury Prevention, Physiotherapy, Patient reported outcome measures, Sports Therapy, and 14 moreMusculoskeletal Injury Prevention, Health Outcomes, Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Musculoskeletal Biomechanics, Orthopaedics Surgery, Sports & Exercise Pychology, Sport, Physical Education, Exercise Science, Rehabilitation, Gait Biomechanics, Bracing, Cartilage Repair, and Autologous chondrocyte implantationedit
- Karen qualified as a physiotherapist in 1998 from the University of Southampton having already completed a degree in ... moreKaren qualified as a physiotherapist in 1998 from the University of Southampton having already completed a degree in sports science. Karen is currently Senior Lecturer in the Centre for Sports Studies at the University of Kent where she is a key member of the Centre’s Tissue Repair and Rehabilitation Research Group. Previously Karen has worked as the sports medicine coordinator for both British Cycling and UKSport.
Karen has developed a special interest in rehabilitation following articular cartilage repair and has recently completed her PhD in this area. Karen has published and presented widely on cartilage repair rehabilitation and in 2006 Karen was the lead author of the first published current concepts paper on rehabilitation following autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee and in 2007 she was the co-director of the 1st International Cartilage Repair Society Rehabilitation Consensus Meeting.edit
Cartilage rehabilitation presents many challenges for clinicians, therapists and patients. The core principles underpinning cartilage rehabilitation are those at the foundation of all musculoskeletal rehabilitation encompassing anatomy,... more
Cartilage rehabilitation presents many challenges for clinicians, therapists and patients. The core principles underpinning cartilage rehabilitation are those at the foundation of all musculoskeletal rehabilitation encompassing anatomy, biomechanics, assessment, therapeutic exercise, treatment modalities and outcome evaluation. 1 To effectively apply these principles to cartilage rehabilitation a working knowledge and understanding of the response of articular cartilage to injury and surgery is essential. Historically, cartilage rehabilitation guidelines have been time criterion based and as the durability and resilience of repair tissue was not fully established they inclined to be conservative. 2 The focus on the rehabilitation tended to be heavily weighted towards the protection of the repair tissue, often, it could be argued at the expense of other aspects critical to function and optimal long-term recovery. In the last decade there has been a drive for a change of culture and a...
Articular cartilage injury is observed with increasing frequency in both elite and amateur athletes and results from the significant acute and chronic joint stress associated with impact sports. Left untreated, articular cartilage defects... more
Articular cartilage injury is observed with increasing frequency in both elite and amateur athletes and results from the significant acute and chronic joint stress associated with impact sports. Left untreated, articular cartilage defects can lead to chronic joint degeneration and athletic and functional disability. Treatment of articular cartilage defects in the athletic population presents a therapeutic challenge due to the high mechanical demands of athletic activity. Several articular cartilage repair techniques have been shown to successfully restore articular cartilage surfaces and allow athletes to return to high-impact sports. Postoperative rehabilitation is a critical component of the treatment process for athletic articular cartilage injury and should take into consideration the biology of the cartilage repair technique, cartilage defect characteristics, and each athlete's sport-specific demands to optimize functional outcome. Systematic, stepwise rehabilitation with criteria-based progression is recommended for an individualized rehabilitation of each athlete not only to achieve initial return to sport at the preinjury level but also to continue sports participation and reduce risk for reinjury or joint degeneration under the high mechanical demands of athletic activity.
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Adolescent, Sports, Humans, Cartilage, Female, and 6 moreMale, Exercise, Adult, Chondrocytes, Sport Rehabilitation, and Recovery of Function
Using a criteria-based approach, clinical symptoms are used to individually guide the progress of the athlete through rehabilitation. Pain and particularly joint effusion following the rehabilitation exercise should be avoided as they can... more
Using a criteria-based approach, clinical symptoms are used to individually guide the progress of the athlete through rehabilitation. Pain and particularly joint effusion following the rehabilitation exercise should be avoided as they can lead to quadriceps inhibition with its negative effect on neuromuscular joint control, joint biomechanics and resultant increase in joint reaction force in the area of the cartilage repair.
Background: Novel smartphone applications are potential alternatives to the long arm goniometer (LAG) but have not undergone evaluation. Purpose: To establish the level of agreement between a novel smartphone application and a LAG for the... more
Background: Novel smartphone applications are potential alternatives to the long arm goniometer (LAG) but have not undergone evaluation. Purpose: To establish the level of agreement between a novel smartphone application and a LAG for the assessment of knee flexion by an inexperienced tester. Methods: Ninety-six healthy participants (mean age 31 years±11) were recruited.
Background: Articular cartilage repair (ACR) procedures aim to alleviate pain and restore function for individuals with chondral defects. Rehabilitation is lengthy, and there are limited data on return to sports and exercise activities... more
Background: Articular cartilage repair (ACR) procedures aim to alleviate pain and restore function for individuals with chondral defects. Rehabilitation is lengthy, and there are limited data on return to sports and exercise activities after ACR in non-elite-athlete populations. The Internet is a growing source of health-related information for patients, and it has resulted in the emergence of online health communities.
Purpose: To establish a postoperative activity profile of users of an online health community who have undergone ACR of the knee and to compare this profile with those from the same community who have undergone initial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Study Design: Cross-sectional.
Methods: Tegner Activity Scale ratings were collected via a self-reported online questionnaire from 201 participants of an online health community who had undergone tibiofemoral and/or patellofemoral ACR (n = 75) or ACLR (n = 126).
Results: A higher Tegner activity level was significantly correlated to time from surgery for ACR (P < 0.005) and ACLR (P < 0.01). At a minimum of 24 months’ follow-up, the ACR group had a median postoperative Tegner score of 3, compared with 6 for the ACLR group. Tegner score was significantly negatively correlated with age at time of surgery for ACLR (P < 0.05) but not for ACR. Men demonstrated significantly higher Tegner activity levels than did women for both ACLR and ACR (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Activity levels after ACR in this population increased with postoperative time but remained lower than expected when compared with current published clinical and normative data.
Clinical Relevance: Engagement with an online health community may influence expectations regarding return to sports and exercise activities. Reporting of activity-level data within clinical studies should be differentiated on the basis of sex. Further research is needed to elucidate factors that determine return to sports and exercise activities after ACR.
Purpose: To establish a postoperative activity profile of users of an online health community who have undergone ACR of the knee and to compare this profile with those from the same community who have undergone initial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Study Design: Cross-sectional.
Methods: Tegner Activity Scale ratings were collected via a self-reported online questionnaire from 201 participants of an online health community who had undergone tibiofemoral and/or patellofemoral ACR (n = 75) or ACLR (n = 126).
Results: A higher Tegner activity level was significantly correlated to time from surgery for ACR (P < 0.005) and ACLR (P < 0.01). At a minimum of 24 months’ follow-up, the ACR group had a median postoperative Tegner score of 3, compared with 6 for the ACLR group. Tegner score was significantly negatively correlated with age at time of surgery for ACLR (P < 0.05) but not for ACR. Men demonstrated significantly higher Tegner activity levels than did women for both ACLR and ACR (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Activity levels after ACR in this population increased with postoperative time but remained lower than expected when compared with current published clinical and normative data.
Clinical Relevance: Engagement with an online health community may influence expectations regarding return to sports and exercise activities. Reporting of activity-level data within clinical studies should be differentiated on the basis of sex. Further research is needed to elucidate factors that determine return to sports and exercise activities after ACR.
PURPOSE: The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) was developed in 1984 and has been widely used in studies on knee populations. The primary objective of this study was to undertake a systematic review on the use of the TAS for articular cartilage... more
PURPOSE: The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) was developed in 1984 and has been widely used in studies on knee populations. The primary objective of this study was to undertake a systematic review on the use of the TAS for articular cartilage repair (ACR) of the knee.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus™, NHS Evidence, ISI Web of Knowledge, AMED, BNI, PEDro and The Cochrane Collaboration of Systematic Reviews) and reference lists from extracted articles. Studies were selected that were published between 1984 and 2009 in which the TAS was reported for patients who had undergone ACR of the knee.
RESULTS: The search strategy identified 442 citations of which 34 articles met the inclusion criteria. There was a large degree of study heterogeneity especially regarding data reporting a wide variation in the number of participants (range 5-137), participant age (range 12-76 years), follow-up time (range 3-120 months) and male-to-female participant ratio. Where pre- to postoperative TAS change was analysed, 88% of studies demonstrated a significant improvement in postoperative TAS scores.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, TAS data were inconsistently reported and methodological detail was often lacking. Caution is advised in the interpretation of TAS scores following ACR of the knee where there are large ranges in postoperative follow-up times, mixed gender cohorts and wide ranges in participant ages. TAS data should be presented and analysed fully and ideally in a standardised fashion to facilitate the comparison of outcomes between studies.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus™, NHS Evidence, ISI Web of Knowledge, AMED, BNI, PEDro and The Cochrane Collaboration of Systematic Reviews) and reference lists from extracted articles. Studies were selected that were published between 1984 and 2009 in which the TAS was reported for patients who had undergone ACR of the knee.
RESULTS: The search strategy identified 442 citations of which 34 articles met the inclusion criteria. There was a large degree of study heterogeneity especially regarding data reporting a wide variation in the number of participants (range 5-137), participant age (range 12-76 years), follow-up time (range 3-120 months) and male-to-female participant ratio. Where pre- to postoperative TAS change was analysed, 88% of studies demonstrated a significant improvement in postoperative TAS scores.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, TAS data were inconsistently reported and methodological detail was often lacking. Caution is advised in the interpretation of TAS scores following ACR of the knee where there are large ranges in postoperative follow-up times, mixed gender cohorts and wide ranges in participant ages. TAS data should be presented and analysed fully and ideally in a standardised fashion to facilitate the comparison of outcomes between studies.
Research Interests:
Autologous chondrocyte implantation is an advanced, cell-based orthobiological technology used for the treatment of chondral defects of the knee. It has been in clinical use since 1987 and has been performed on 12 000 patients... more
Autologous chondrocyte implantation is an advanced, cell-based orthobiological technology used for the treatment of chondral defects of the knee. It has been in clinical use since 1987 and has been performed on 12 000 patients internationally; but despite having been in clinical use for more than 15 years, the evidence base for rehabilitation after autologous chondrocyte implanta- tion is notably deficient. The authors review current clinical practice and present an overview of the principles behind autologous chondrocyte implantation rehabilitation practices. They examine the main rehabilitation components and discuss their practical applications within the overall treatment program, with the aim of facilitating the formulation of appropriate, individualized patient rehabilitation protocols for autologous chondrocyte implantation.
Research Interests:
Background: The relevance of knee-specific subjective measures of outcome to patients has not been evaluated for cartilage repair procedures. Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify which instrument out of the Knee injury... more
Background: The relevance of knee-specific subjective measures of outcome to patients has not been evaluated for cartilage repair procedures.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify which instrument out of the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients.
Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Data were collected from 58 participants of an Internet knee forum via a self-reported online questionnaire consisting of demographic and surgical data, the Tegner activity scale, and 49 consolidated items from the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Item importance, frequency, and frequency-importance product were calculated.
Results: Overall, the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form was the highest scoring instrument in all categories. However, 2 of the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (“function in sport and recreation” and “knee-related quality of life”) scored higher on mean importance and frequency-importance product than the overall International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score.
Conclusion: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form provided the best overall measure of symp- toms and disabilities that are most important to this population of postoperative articular cartilage repair patients. This brings into question the validity of using the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in shorter-term—less than 10 years—studies. Issues related to sports activity appear to be highly valued and very pertinent to evaluation of outcomes for this patient group.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify which instrument out of the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients.
Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Data were collected from 58 participants of an Internet knee forum via a self-reported online questionnaire consisting of demographic and surgical data, the Tegner activity scale, and 49 consolidated items from the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Item importance, frequency, and frequency-importance product were calculated.
Results: Overall, the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form was the highest scoring instrument in all categories. However, 2 of the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales (“function in sport and recreation” and “knee-related quality of life”) scored higher on mean importance and frequency-importance product than the overall International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score.
Conclusion: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form provided the best overall measure of symp- toms and disabilities that are most important to this population of postoperative articular cartilage repair patients. This brings into question the validity of using the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in shorter-term—less than 10 years—studies. Issues related to sports activity appear to be highly valued and very pertinent to evaluation of outcomes for this patient group.
Research Interests:
Background: Knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures are frequently used after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction but little is known about whether they measure outcomes important to patients. Purpose: The aim of this study... more
Background: Knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures are frequently used after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction but little is known about whether they measure outcomes important to patients.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify which instrument, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) or the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), captures symptoms and disabilities most important to patients who have undergone initial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Data were collected from 126 participants of an Internet knee forum. A self-reported online questionnaire was developed consisting of demographic and surgical data, the Tegner Activity Scale, and 49 consolidated items from the KOOS and the IKDC. Item importance, frequency, and frequency-importance product were calculated.
Results: Seventy-eight percent of the items from the IKDC were experienced by more than half of the patients, compared with 57% from the KOOS. Items extracted from the Function in Sports/Recreation and Quality of Life KOOS subscales were highly important to this group of patients. For patients 12 months or more after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 94% of the IKDC items had a frequency-importance product of 1 or less compared with 86% of the KOOS items.
Conclusion: Overall, the IKDC items outperformed the KOOS items on all of the 5 criteria with the exception of the frequency- importance product for patients who were 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The KOOS Function in Sports/Recreation and Knee-Related Quality of Life subscales outperformed the IKDC for the total cohort as well as for male and female subgroups. However, differences in individual items were not always evident from either total scale or subscale ratings. Studies should use patient-reported outcomes that reflect patients’ most important concerns and further prospective longitudinal research is required in this area.
Keywords: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC); outcome measures; anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; knee ligament; patient-reported outcome
Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify which instrument, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) or the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), captures symptoms and disabilities most important to patients who have undergone initial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: Data were collected from 126 participants of an Internet knee forum. A self-reported online questionnaire was developed consisting of demographic and surgical data, the Tegner Activity Scale, and 49 consolidated items from the KOOS and the IKDC. Item importance, frequency, and frequency-importance product were calculated.
Results: Seventy-eight percent of the items from the IKDC were experienced by more than half of the patients, compared with 57% from the KOOS. Items extracted from the Function in Sports/Recreation and Quality of Life KOOS subscales were highly important to this group of patients. For patients 12 months or more after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 94% of the IKDC items had a frequency-importance product of 1 or less compared with 86% of the KOOS items.
Conclusion: Overall, the IKDC items outperformed the KOOS items on all of the 5 criteria with the exception of the frequency- importance product for patients who were 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The KOOS Function in Sports/Recreation and Knee-Related Quality of Life subscales outperformed the IKDC for the total cohort as well as for male and female subgroups. However, differences in individual items were not always evident from either total scale or subscale ratings. Studies should use patient-reported outcomes that reflect patients’ most important concerns and further prospective longitudinal research is required in this area.
Keywords: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC); outcome measures; anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; knee ligament; patient-reported outcome
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Ergonomics, Evidence Based Medicine, Treatment, and 18 moreLiterature Review, Sport, Sports, Clinical Decision Making, Humans, Rate of return, Young Adult, American, Systematic review, Cartilage Repair, Adult, Knee injuries, Articular Cartilage Wear, Study design, SURGICAL TECHNIQUE, Athletic performance, Articular Cartilage, and Recovery of Function
*Karen Hambly, PT, MCSP, Centre for Sports Studies, University of Kent, Chatham, Kent ME4 4AG, United Kingdom (e-mail: k.hambly{at}kent.ac.uk). ... Background: Knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures are frequently used after... more
*Karen Hambly, PT, MCSP, Centre for Sports Studies, University of Kent, Chatham, Kent ME4 4AG, United Kingdom (e-mail: k.hambly{at}kent.ac.uk). ... Background: Knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures are frequently used after anterior cruciate ligament ...
... Divisions: Faculties &gt; Social Sciences &gt; School of Sports Studies. ID Code: 26285. Deposited by: Karen Hambly. Deposited on: 21 Jan 2011 17:05. Last Modified: 21 Jan 2011 17:05. Repository staff only: item control page.... more
... Divisions: Faculties &gt; Social Sciences &gt; School of Sports Studies. ID Code: 26285. Deposited by: Karen Hambly. Deposited on: 21 Jan 2011 17:05. Last Modified: 21 Jan 2011 17:05. Repository staff only: item control page. ...
... Divisions: Faculties &amp;gt; Social Sciences &amp;gt; School of Sports Studies. ID Code: 26284. Deposited by: Karen Hambly. Deposited on: 21 Jan 2011 17:02. Last Modified: 21 Jan 2011 17:02. Repository staff only: item... more
... Divisions: Faculties &amp;gt; Social Sciences &amp;gt; School of Sports Studies. ID Code: 26284. Deposited by: Karen Hambly. Deposited on: 21 Jan 2011 17:02. Last Modified: 21 Jan 2011 17:02. Repository staff only: item control page. ...
Osteoarthritis (OA) is not an inevitable consequence of human aging but age-associated sarcopenia is. Loss of strength in healthy men and women begins around the fourth decade initially proceeding at a rate of loss of around 1% per year... more
Osteoarthritis (OA) is not an inevitable consequence of human aging but age-associated sarcopenia is. Loss of strength in healthy men and women begins around the fourth decade initially proceeding at a rate of loss of around 1% per year before accelerating from the seventh decade ...
... Divisions: Faculties &gt; Social Sciences &gt; School of Sports Studies. ID Code: 26287. Deposited by: Karen Hambly. Deposited on: 21 Jan 2011 17:09. Last Modified: 21 Jan 2011 17:09. Repository staff only: item control page.... more
... Divisions: Faculties &gt; Social Sciences &gt; School of Sports Studies. ID Code: 26287. Deposited by: Karen Hambly. Deposited on: 21 Jan 2011 17:09. Last Modified: 21 Jan 2011 17:09. Repository staff only: item control page. ...