You know why
mcwaffle777
Recent community posts
Yes, very native and very proficient. My statement does make sense. If you are not native and have a question I can explain further. And for the record its quite obviously you that is not native to the language. As for age it is completely irrelevant nor was there anything immature or "old sounding" about my post so I guess its some sort of insult or something. I find people that use age, language proficiency, and or spelling/grammar as some vector of attack are almost always the people insecure about their own.
As for my statement you said :
"And not a loss because I got a couple hundred games on Steam that I have yet to play."
FYI that isn't a complete sentence in English. I sometimes tutor people for TOEFL exams so if you need an explanation, ask. Anyways in response to that I said "Not playing this is your loss 100% of the time" as in you not playing this is always your loss. You lose not playing.
"So actually it is good because it keeps me from buying yet another game I may never get around to playing."
Another bad sentence. In this sentence all the bold words reference the same thing, this game. The issue here is IT (Hero's Hour) keeps you from buying yet another game (Also hero's hour) While most people would understand you, as I did, if you were in a testing environment for proficiency it would incorrect.
I end my statement saying, "not the other way around" which is a way to refer to the opposite of what i just said, which in this refers to your proclamation this isn't a loss for you.
here is another example:
"Although it may seem as though an old dress from the 1960s should be considerably less expensive than a brand new modern dress, it’s actually the other way around."
Cheers.
I hope you are being facetious. If you aren't you should know it's a buggy mess and never works. To this day, i have never gotten signed up for the newsletter on Legends of Keepers.
You shouldn't take or really care about my experience or single opinion. Check the Legends of Keepers Reviews and boards and there are a decent amount of complaints about it even in the positive reviews. In that game, the content is stuff fundamental to the gameplay, with no reskins or a minor variation. Entire new monsters into already small pools of monsters. Not only were they locked behind a newsletter they were timed and would expire meaning after a certain date if you were later to the show you would never get access to that content.
It's that last part that helps explain the strange deal about their newsletter. They leverage "Fear of missing out" to further manipulate players into joining. They obnoxiously have promos and adverts for it in-game menus
The whole thing is bizarre like in school they had some class that said newsletters are very important and they got fixated on it. 90% of emails will auto-spam it anyways so I doubt it is very effective. If you wanna sour steam users quickly have them pay XX.XX for your game, log in and see a giant annoying box telling them certain heroes or exclusive monthly heroes cant be accessed in the product they paid for until they sign up for the newsletter and receive a code to enter for it. It is not how one should treat customers who paid for your product. I like them other than that one bizarre fixation they have.
Sorry for the blog. I hope you just fucking with me. I rather them have a portion of the ingame main screen real estate dedicated to them with rating adds for new upcoming content that is hyperlinked or opens stuff in steam.