Papers by Lyudmila Igumnova
Http Dx Doi Org 10 1080 13518046 2011 572729, Apr 1, 2011
Two types of strategic cultures developed by Europe and America were the subjects of numerous pol... more Two types of strategic cultures developed by Europe and America were the subjects of numerous policy analyses. Divergences in Russian and European views on the world are obvious as well: postmodern Europe contrasts with Russia as a traditional power. ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 2011
Two types of strategic cultures developed by Europe and America were the subjects of numerous pol... more Two types of strategic cultures developed by Europe and America were the subjects of numerous policy analyses. Divergences in Russian and European views on the world are obvious as well: postmodern Europe contrasts with Russia as a traditional power. ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration, Discussion paper No 3/18, 2018
The paper explores Russia-related official statements and press releases of the European External... more The paper explores Russia-related official statements and press releases of the European External Action Service (EEAS), as well as speeches of the European Union’s two High Representatives for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy posted on the website of the service in the period of 2010-2017. The goal of the analysis is to distinguish the elements of normative, soft and transformative power in EU’s official communications with Moscow and to specify what type of power and influence the EU tries to exercise in Russia. Quantitative text analysis of the EEAS documents was carried out for this purpose. The results obtained demonstrate that the EEAS communications towards Russia are limited to a narrow range of problems; the principles of the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms dominate in its dialogue with Moscow. Criticizing mainly violation of legal norms, the European External Action Service positions itself as normative actor, promoting normative agenda in the country. The elements of soft and transformative power are very scarcely represented. The problem of the EU’s normative impact is beyond the scope of the paper.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
В статье анализируются официальные заявления и пресс-релизы, публикуемые Европейской внешнеполити... more В статье анализируются официальные заявления и пресс-релизы, публикуемые Европейской внешнеполитической службой (ЕВПС), а также речи Верховных представителей ЕС по внешней политике и безопасности, посвящённые России и размещённые на сайте службы за весь период её деятельности (2010‒2017 гг.). Цель исследования – выявить элементы нормативной, мягкой и трансформационной силы Европейского Союза в официальных заявлениях Брюсселя в адрес Москвы и определить, какой именно вид силы ЕС пытается реализовывать в России. Для этого автором был проведён количественный анализ документов ЕВПС. Полученные результаты демонстрируют, что заявления внешнеполитической службы ЕС ограничиваются узким кругом проблем. Принципы верховенства права, прав и свобод человека доминируют в диалоге ЕВПС с Москвой. Критикуя главным образом нарушение правовых норм, дипломатическое ведомство ЕС позиционирует себя в качестве нормативного актора, продвигая нормативную повестку в стране. Элементы мягкой и трансформационной силы представлены слабо.
The paper explores Russia-related official statements of the European External Action Service (EEAS), press releases and speeches of the European Union’s two High Representatives for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy posted on the website of the service during the whole period of its activities (2010‒2017). The goal of the analysis is to distinguish the elements of normative, soft and transformative power in EU’s official communications to Moscow and to specify what type of power the EU tries to exercise in Russia. Quantitative text analysis of the EEAS documents was carried out for this purpose. The results obtained
demonstrate that the communications of the European diplomatic service with Russia are limited to a narrow range of problems. The principles of the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms dominate in the dialogue of the EEAS with Moscow. Criticizing mainly violation of legal norms, the European External Action Service positions itself as normative actor, promoting normative agenda in the country. The elements of soft and transformative power are very scarcely represented.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Books by Lyudmila Igumnova
В монографии рассматриваются проблемы внешней политики Европейского Союза в 1990–2010-е гг. Автор... more В монографии рассматриваются проблемы внешней политики Европейского Союза в 1990–2010-е гг. Авторами анализируются теоретические подходы к изучению внешней политики ЕС, исследуются региональные и страновые направления международного сотрудничества Евросоюза: отношения с США, Россией, странами постсоветского пространства и Азиатско-Тихоокеанского региона (Китаем, Монголией, Австралией, странами АСЕМ). Освещаются проблемы публичной дипломатии ЕС и политика Евросоюза в области ядерного нераспространения. Для преподавателей, студентов, магистрантов, аспирантов и всех интересующихся европейскими исследованиями и внешней политикой Европейского Союза.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Lyudmila Igumnova
The paper explores Russia-related official statements of the European External Action Service (EEAS), press releases and speeches of the European Union’s two High Representatives for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy posted on the website of the service during the whole period of its activities (2010‒2017). The goal of the analysis is to distinguish the elements of normative, soft and transformative power in EU’s official communications to Moscow and to specify what type of power the EU tries to exercise in Russia. Quantitative text analysis of the EEAS documents was carried out for this purpose. The results obtained
demonstrate that the communications of the European diplomatic service with Russia are limited to a narrow range of problems. The principles of the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms dominate in the dialogue of the EEAS with Moscow. Criticizing mainly violation of legal norms, the European External Action Service positions itself as normative actor, promoting normative agenda in the country. The elements of soft and transformative power are very scarcely represented.
Books by Lyudmila Igumnova
The paper explores Russia-related official statements of the European External Action Service (EEAS), press releases and speeches of the European Union’s two High Representatives for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy posted on the website of the service during the whole period of its activities (2010‒2017). The goal of the analysis is to distinguish the elements of normative, soft and transformative power in EU’s official communications to Moscow and to specify what type of power the EU tries to exercise in Russia. Quantitative text analysis of the EEAS documents was carried out for this purpose. The results obtained
demonstrate that the communications of the European diplomatic service with Russia are limited to a narrow range of problems. The principles of the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms dominate in the dialogue of the EEAS with Moscow. Criticizing mainly violation of legal norms, the European External Action Service positions itself as normative actor, promoting normative agenda in the country. The elements of soft and transformative power are very scarcely represented.