çoklu by Mihriban Sengul
Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 2016
30 Mart 2014 yerel secimlerinin Malatya sehri ozelinde bir analizini sunmayi hedefleyen bu makale... more 30 Mart 2014 yerel secimlerinin Malatya sehri ozelinde bir analizini sunmayi hedefleyen bu makalede, Turkiye’de AKP liderligindeki neoliberal ve neomuhafazakâr iktidar blogunun hegemonik yapisinin oteki ulusal ve yerel aktorlerin secim stratejileri ve kent siyasetleri uzerinde belirleyici oldugu saptamasindan yola cikilmistir. Buradan hareketle, makalenin temel hipotezi, parti ici merkeziyetci yapilarin guclu oldugu kosullarla birlikte merkezi olcekte guclu bir iktidar blogunun varliginin, yerel secimlerde siyasal partilerin secim stratejilerinde ve kent siyasetlerinde farkliliklardan cok benzerliklere neden oldugudur. Bu benzerliklerin altinda yatan dinamikler, Gramsci’nin "tarihsel blok" kavramsallastirmasi uzerinden okunmaya calisilmistir. Soz konusu benzerlikleri, siyasal partilerin Malatya’daki yerel aktorlerle eklemlenme tarzlarinda, aday belirleme sureclerinde, Malatya Buyuksehir Belediyesine gosterdikleri adaylarin ortak yonlerinde ve soylemlerinde gormek mumkundur. Calismada incelemesi yapilan partiler, Malatya kentinde gerek eski secimlerde gerekse 30 Mart 2014 yerel secimlerinde guclu olan AKP, CHP, SP ve MHP'dir. Soz konusu partilerin il teskilatlarinin ust duzey yoneticileri ve kentin toplumsal ve siyasal yasamina taniklik etmis on uc kisiyle yapilan derinlemesine gorusme yoluyla veri toplanmis, elde edilen veriler tematik olarak analiz edilmistir.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Toplum ve Demokrasi, 2014
Üniversitelerin özerklik sorununa ilişkin tartışmaların ve çözümlemelerin çoğunluğu şu iki kabule... more Üniversitelerin özerklik sorununa ilişkin tartışmaların ve çözümlemelerin çoğunluğu şu iki kabule dayanır: (1) Üniversiteler, iktidar ve sınıf mücadelesi alanının dışında, kendi içinde homojen, evrensel ve “yüce” bilimsel bilgiyi arayan, üreten ve yayan kurumlardır. (2) Üniversitelerin özerkliği, üniversiteye dışsal iktidar odaklarının tek yönlü tahakkümü ile sınırlanır. Oysa ne üniversiteler ileri sürüldüğü gibi ideal kurumlardır ne de üniversite özerkliğinin ihlali “üniversitelere rağmen” gerçekleşir. Çünkü siyasal ve ekonomik iktidarlar, üniversite içinden aktörlerin işbirliği olmadan etkili olamazlar. Üniversiteler, bilimsel faaliyetin doğası nedeniyle göreli olarak özerk bir konuma sahip olsalar da toplumsal yaşamın öteki alanlarıyla geçirgen ilişkilere sahip kurumlardır. Taşra kentlerinde ise merkezi iktidar odaklarının yanı sıra yerel iktidar odakları da üniversite içine sızdığından sorun daha karmaşıktır. Bu yazı, üniversitelerin siyasal ve ekonomik iktidar ilişkilerine eklemlenmesinin bilimsel faaliyetlerin içinde gerçekleştiği nesnel koşullar ve akademik özgürlükler üzerindeki etkilerini taşra üniversiteleri üzerinden tartışmaktadır.
Most discussions and analysis on problems regarding university autonomy are based on two assumptions: (1) Universities are not places of power and class struggle. Moreover, they are institutions which produce and disseminate universal and “noble” scientific knowledge. (2) The autonomy of universities is limited by unilateral domination of external powers. However, neither universities are ideal institutions as they are claimed to be nor the violation of university autonomy is realized “despite the universities”. Because political and economic powers cannot affect universities excluding the collaboration with the insiders of universities. Although the universities have relatively autonomous situation due to promoting scientific activities, they are the institutions which interact with other areas of social life. As central and local powers interfere in universities in provincial cities, the problem is more complicated than it seems. This study aims to discuss the effects of universities’ being the part of political and economic powers on scientific activities and academic freedom at provincial universities.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Papers by Mihriban Sengul
Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 2008
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 2002
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
DergiPark (Istanbul University), Jan 13, 2015
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
DergiPark (Istanbul University), Jul 31, 2008
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Çalışma ve toplum, 2021
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bu makalede, HES karsiti koylu hareketleri hakkinda su iki soruya yanit aradim: (1) “Koylulerin d... more Bu makalede, HES karsiti koylu hareketleri hakkinda su iki soruya yanit aradim: (1) “Koylulerin dogayla iliskisel cikarlari ve dogayi sahiplenme iliskileri ile doganin korunmasi talepleri arasinda nasil bir iliski vardir?” Bu soruya yanit ararken koylulugun yapisal ozelliklerini ve tarihsel kapitalizmin belirlenimi altinda yasamakta oldugu donusumu goz ardi etmeden, koylulerin cikarlarinin ve deger sistemlerinin en onemli belirleyenlerinden biri olan “doga ile iliskileri”nin yapisini ve bu yapinin donusumunun dayandigi dinamikleri tanimlamak amaciyla Lefebvre’in somut mekân, soyut mekân ve sahiplenme kavramlarindan yararlandim. (2) “HES karsiti koylu hareketleri ile sermayenin kirsal alana nufuzunun artmasi ve koylulerin “sermaye kapani” icine sikismasi arasinda nasil bir iliski vardir?” Koyluler, sermayenin yarattigi metalasma baskisi karsisinda kendi emegi ve toprak (doga) uzerindeki somuru oranini artirarak, yeni gelir kaynaklari arayarak ya da yasam standartlarini dusurerek dir...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
DergiPark (Istanbul University), Dec 30, 2017
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi dergisi, Jul 31, 2008
It is important in respect of future of a discipline that a discipline evaluates its own accumula... more It is important in respect of future of a discipline that a discipline evaluates its own accumulation of publications at certain intervals. Most of the scientific research are published as articles at journals. Therefore, journals provide considerable opportunities for the such evaluations. The accumulation of publications of the disciplines interested in environment in Turkey has reached to the level maturity for such an attempt. Every discipline takes place in the Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences (FEAS) has produced researches about environment and the journals of FEAS have covered a great majority of research concerned. In Turkey, the most popular platform for publications of the disciplines of FEAS is the journals of the FEAS. In this study, the bibliography of articles concerning environment published in the journals of FEAS has been produced; those articles have been examined quantitatively by the analysis of bibliography and citations; the findings have been classified and interpreted.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
çoklu by Mihriban Sengul
Most discussions and analysis on problems regarding university autonomy are based on two assumptions: (1) Universities are not places of power and class struggle. Moreover, they are institutions which produce and disseminate universal and “noble” scientific knowledge. (2) The autonomy of universities is limited by unilateral domination of external powers. However, neither universities are ideal institutions as they are claimed to be nor the violation of university autonomy is realized “despite the universities”. Because political and economic powers cannot affect universities excluding the collaboration with the insiders of universities. Although the universities have relatively autonomous situation due to promoting scientific activities, they are the institutions which interact with other areas of social life. As central and local powers interfere in universities in provincial cities, the problem is more complicated than it seems. This study aims to discuss the effects of universities’ being the part of political and economic powers on scientific activities and academic freedom at provincial universities.
Papers by Mihriban Sengul
Most discussions and analysis on problems regarding university autonomy are based on two assumptions: (1) Universities are not places of power and class struggle. Moreover, they are institutions which produce and disseminate universal and “noble” scientific knowledge. (2) The autonomy of universities is limited by unilateral domination of external powers. However, neither universities are ideal institutions as they are claimed to be nor the violation of university autonomy is realized “despite the universities”. Because political and economic powers cannot affect universities excluding the collaboration with the insiders of universities. Although the universities have relatively autonomous situation due to promoting scientific activities, they are the institutions which interact with other areas of social life. As central and local powers interfere in universities in provincial cities, the problem is more complicated than it seems. This study aims to discuss the effects of universities’ being the part of political and economic powers on scientific activities and academic freedom at provincial universities.