Skip to main content
Tim Moses

    Tim Moses

    • noneedit
    • Graduated on Lomonosov Moskow State University in Physics in 1967, specialized in Physics applied to Information Tech... moreedit
    • Elina Petrovnaedit
    In our earlier research[1], we described the Dynamic Syntax Tree method implementation for enhancing the Static Analysis process. After 10+ years of experience, we collected the significant results presented in this paper Keywords-dynamic... more
    In our earlier research[1], we described the Dynamic Syntax Tree method implementation for enhancing the Static Analysis process. After 10+ years of experience, we collected the significant results presented in this paper Keywords-dynamic syntax tree, dynamic analysis , static code analysis, abstract syntax tree, parser, semantic I.
    Dynamic Syntax Tree (DST) implementations [1] use Binary Sandboxing for enhancing the Static Analysis process. In this paper we present a new Dynamic Binary analysis method for collecting information on ELF, PE and Mach-O executables and... more
    Dynamic Syntax Tree (DST) implementations [1] use Binary Sandboxing for enhancing the Static Analysis process. In this paper we present a new Dynamic Binary analysis method for collecting information on ELF, PE and Mach-O executables and dynamic libraries. This information will enrich DST contents during application scanning Keywords-dynamic syntax tree, binary analysis, sandbox, dynamic analysis , static code analysis, abstract syntax tree, parser I.
    Updated Results of a Dynamic Syntax Tree method implementation for enhancing the Static Analysis process. We collected the most significant results of latest 4 year, presented in this paper Keywords-dynamic syntax tree, dynamic analysis ,... more
    Updated Results of a Dynamic Syntax Tree method implementation for enhancing the Static Analysis process. We collected the most significant results of latest 4 year, presented in this paper Keywords-dynamic syntax tree, dynamic analysis , static code analysis, abstract syntax tree, parser, semantic I.
    –Dynamic Syntax Tree (DST) implementations use Binary Sandboxing for enhancing the Static Analysis process. In this paper we present a new Dynamic Binary analysis method for collecting information on ELF, PE and Mach-O executables and... more
    –Dynamic Syntax Tree (DST) implementations use Binary Sandboxing for enhancing the Static Analysis process. In this paper we present a new Dynamic Binary analysis method for collecting information on ELF, PE and Mach-O executables and dynamic libraries. This information will enrich DST contents during application scanning
    Research Interests:
    –In our earlier research[1], we described the Dynamic Syntax Tree method implementation for enhancing the Static Analysis process. After 10+ years of experience, we collected the significant results presented in this paper
    Research Interests:
    –Updated Results of a Dynamic Syntax Tree method implementation for enhancing the Static Analysis process. We collected the most significant results of latest 4 year, presented in this paper
    Research Interests:
    –Most of Static Analysis tools are nowadays based on Abstract Syntax or Concrete (aka Parser) Trees. For analyzing applications written in modern programming languages, were types and objects are dynamically created, those tools cannot... more
    –Most of Static Analysis tools are nowadays based on Abstract Syntax or Concrete (aka Parser) Trees. For analyzing applications written in modern programming languages, were types and objects are dynamically created, those tools cannot provide accurate analysis results because they are designed for static programming languages only. Moreover described is the new Dynamic Syntax Trees-based method for enhancing the Static Analysis process.
    Research Interests:
    –In our earlier research [1] on area of Static Analysis of applications written using modern languages, we discussed about lack of accurate analysis of algorithms based on Abstract Syntax and Concrete (CST, aka Parser) Trees. Moreover... more
    –In our earlier research [1] on area of Static Analysis of applications written using modern languages, we discussed about lack of accurate analysis of algorithms based on Abstract Syntax and Concrete (CST, aka Parser) Trees. Moreover described is the Dynamic Syntax Tree method implementation for enhancing the Static Analysis process.
    Research Interests:
    –New generation Web Application Firewalls (ngWAF), new Dynamic Analysis (modern DAST products) RASP and DevOps fever are making Static Analysis (SAST) techniques useless? No, Absolutely not. But commercial Static Analysis vendors have to... more
    –New generation Web Application Firewalls (ngWAF), new Dynamic Analysis (modern DAST products) RASP and DevOps fever are making Static Analysis (SAST) techniques useless? No, Absolutely not. But commercial Static Analysis vendors have to think different if they want their products to survive. Software solutions performing automatic code analysis are still very important, especially for remediation assistance capabilities or for extracting semantic metadata. These methods gather syntactic information from the source code and/or binaries, and then in general they provide large set of implying semantics. With the increased focus on dynamic techniques for vulnerabilities detection and prevention the problem emerges – modern programming languages are dynamic and the whole code semantic is known only at runtime and the analysis has to estimate larger relations. Moreover described is a new algorithm for better contrasting the jeopardize of dynamic analysis techniques.
    Research Interests: