Marshall Barnes
Advanced concept science and technology researcher, innovation and creativity master, conceptual theorist and the world's top time travel scientist. Member of Philosophy of Time Society, Scientific American's 1,000 Scientists in 1,000 Days program, National STEM Network, National Space Society, NineSigma Open Source Innovation community, InformalScience.org, Innocentive.org and the George Lucas Educational Foundation's Edutopia community.
I have an extensive and eclectic background in the science of creativity, media, a/v technology and production, education, art, poetry, music composition and production, mind/machine interfacing and technocogninetics, and various aspects of physics, with a strong leaning in temporal mechanics and the practical application of the extreme implications of quantum mechanics and Special and General relativity.
Bio - http://archive.informalscience.org/member/show/8498
Profile Page - http://about.me/marshallbarnes
I have an extensive and eclectic background in the science of creativity, media, a/v technology and production, education, art, poetry, music composition and production, mind/machine interfacing and technocogninetics, and various aspects of physics, with a strong leaning in temporal mechanics and the practical application of the extreme implications of quantum mechanics and Special and General relativity.
Bio - http://archive.informalscience.org/member/show/8498
Profile Page - http://about.me/marshallbarnes
less
InterestsView All (65)
Uploads
In this paper, I will reveal an analysis of Mallett's basic design for a time machine, as well as the LOTART design in which it was applied for submission for the US provisional patent, showing inherent aspects that were missed by Mallett that present crucial, and critical breakthrough physics, that point toward a documented and viable alternative that would accomplish the purpose for which Mallett claims is the reason for his work-the achievement of time travel to the past.
In this paper, I will reveal an analysis of Mallett's basic design for a time machine, as well as the LOTART design in which it was applied for submission for the US provisional patent, showing inherent aspects that were missed by Mallett that present crucial, and critical breakthrough physics, that point toward a documented and viable alternative that would accomplish the purpose for which Mallett claims is the reason for his work-the achievement of time travel to the past.