Min Li
Li, Min (Ph.D, University of Michigan, 2008) is an associate professor of East Asian archaeology with a joint appointment at Department of Anthropology and Department of Asian Languages and Cultures at UCLA. His archaeological research spans from state formation in early China to early modern global trade network. He is also co-director of the landscape archaeology project in the Bronze Age city of Qufu, China. His first book Social Memory and State Formation in Early China with the Cambridge University Press is published in May, 2018.
less
Uploads
本文探討早期中國《禹貢》九州空間理想的形成與傳承。對文體風格演變趨勢的分析支持《禹貢》地理思想形成的長紀年假説,指出這種思想在戰國時代已經 成爲諸子百家的知識前提,並存在多種版本與傳承脉絡。因此,這種古老的天下觀 是戰國、秦漢時期大一統理念的重要知識來源,並非在戰國晚期由魏國創造。考察《禹貢》空間理想的起源、傳承與社會背景,需要一個大幅度拓展的時空框架和知識 基礎。當代考古學對經學的貢獻在於超越文本的範疇,探究文獻背後知識前提的形成過程。
urban foundations. Instead, they were built as political centers and abandoned as such without evolving into an enduring urban tradition. This paper will focus on the parallel networks of power operation in these states, the tensions leading to their urban demise, and the evidence for resistance against state powers. The deeply embedded kinship networks and the historical legacies of these successive political developments contributed to the fragility of early states. The reconfiguration of political landscape in
early China at the end of the Second Millennium BC addressed the tensions derived from governing a state with complex political legacies and gave rise to the classical tradition in early China.
本文探討早期中國《禹貢》九州空間理想的形成與傳承。對文體風格演變趨勢的分析支持《禹貢》地理思想形成的長紀年假説,指出這種思想在戰國時代已經 成爲諸子百家的知識前提,並存在多種版本與傳承脉絡。因此,這種古老的天下觀 是戰國、秦漢時期大一統理念的重要知識來源,並非在戰國晚期由魏國創造。考察《禹貢》空間理想的起源、傳承與社會背景,需要一個大幅度拓展的時空框架和知識 基礎。當代考古學對經學的貢獻在於超越文本的範疇,探究文獻背後知識前提的形成過程。
urban foundations. Instead, they were built as political centers and abandoned as such without evolving into an enduring urban tradition. This paper will focus on the parallel networks of power operation in these states, the tensions leading to their urban demise, and the evidence for resistance against state powers. The deeply embedded kinship networks and the historical legacies of these successive political developments contributed to the fragility of early states. The reconfiguration of political landscape in
early China at the end of the Second Millennium BC addressed the tensions derived from governing a state with complex political legacies and gave rise to the classical tradition in early China.