Papers by Kristine Chadwick
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
AEL is a catalyst for schools and communities to build lifelong learning systems that harness res... more AEL is a catalyst for schools and communities to build lifelong learning systems that harness resources, research, and practical wisdom. AEL serves as the Regional Educational Laboratory
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
AEL, 2004
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
86th American …, 2004
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
ED456530 - Evaluation of Collaborative Efforts between AEL and the Virginia Governor.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
AEL is a catalyst for schools and communities to build lifelong learning systems that harness res... more AEL is a catalyst for schools and communities to build lifelong learning systems that harness resources, research, and practical wisdom. AEL serves as the Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) for Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. For these same four states, it ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Research in …, 2002
Earlv-career rural principals IIIay 1I1l1' i ' more pronounced needs forpmfe.nional dev... more Earlv-career rural principals IIIay 1I1l1' i ' more pronounced needs forpmfe.nional development than 'heir suburban und 11r/1II1l cuumerparts. due in pan to geographic isolationfrom peers and other resources IJnJ the need to aHU11le more varied roles than principals in other ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
AEL, 2004
The Model IV Intervention is one of four models that provide technical assistance to Virginia sch... more The Model IV Intervention is one of four models that provide technical assistance to Virginia school divisions and that are now being tested by VDOE under the PA+SS project. The Model IV Intervention differs from Models I, II, and III because it is directed from the school division central office, ...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Policy Briefs and White Papers by Kristine Chadwick
In 2012, California Senate Bill 1458 added a measure of college and career preparedness to the Ac... more In 2012, California Senate Bill 1458 added a measure of college and career preparedness to the Academic Performance Index (API). The Public Schools Accountability Act Advisory Committee was charged with making recommendations to the State Superintendent of Public Instruction and the State Board of Education regarding measures that could serve as indicators of college and career preparedness at the high school level.
The Educational Policy Improvement Center (EPIC) was commissioned to evaluate potential measures identified by the Committee. To do so, EPIC employed a criterion-based evaluation framework that focused on the technical quality, stakeholder
relevance, and system utility of each potential measure.
Five potential categories of measures were evaluated and reported in a series of white papers (and a sixth white paper examined multiple measures):
1. College admission exams
2. Advanced coursework
3. Innovative measures
4. Course-taking behavior
5. Career preparedness assessments
The EPIC evaluation leads to the recommendation that a measure of course-taking behavior would be the single best indicator that meets the evaluative criteria used and also has the greatest probability of leading to improvements in college and career
preparedness statewide.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Kristine Chadwick
Policy Briefs and White Papers by Kristine Chadwick
The Educational Policy Improvement Center (EPIC) was commissioned to evaluate potential measures identified by the Committee. To do so, EPIC employed a criterion-based evaluation framework that focused on the technical quality, stakeholder
relevance, and system utility of each potential measure.
Five potential categories of measures were evaluated and reported in a series of white papers (and a sixth white paper examined multiple measures):
1. College admission exams
2. Advanced coursework
3. Innovative measures
4. Course-taking behavior
5. Career preparedness assessments
The EPIC evaluation leads to the recommendation that a measure of course-taking behavior would be the single best indicator that meets the evaluative criteria used and also has the greatest probability of leading to improvements in college and career
preparedness statewide.
The Educational Policy Improvement Center (EPIC) was commissioned to evaluate potential measures identified by the Committee. To do so, EPIC employed a criterion-based evaluation framework that focused on the technical quality, stakeholder
relevance, and system utility of each potential measure.
Five potential categories of measures were evaluated and reported in a series of white papers (and a sixth white paper examined multiple measures):
1. College admission exams
2. Advanced coursework
3. Innovative measures
4. Course-taking behavior
5. Career preparedness assessments
The EPIC evaluation leads to the recommendation that a measure of course-taking behavior would be the single best indicator that meets the evaluative criteria used and also has the greatest probability of leading to improvements in college and career
preparedness statewide.