Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2015
PurposeThis study compared the effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children wit... more PurposeThis study compared the effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with specific language impairment.MethodA double-blind superiority trial with cluster randomization was used to compare a cueing procedure, designed to elicit a correct production following an initial error, to a recasting procedure, which required no further production. Thirty-one 5-year-old children with specific language impairment participated in 8 small group, classroom-based treatment sessions. Fourteen children received the cueing approach and 17 received the recasting approach.ResultsThe cueing group made significantly more progress over the 8-week treatment period than the recasting group. There was a medium–large treatment effect in the cueing group and a negligible effect size in the recasting group. The groups did not differ in maintenance of treatment effects 8 weeks after treatment. In single-subject analyses, 50% of children in the cueing group and 12% in the recasting group ...
As researchers, psychologists, linguists and educators who have studied the processes underlying ... more As researchers, psychologists, linguists and educators who have studied the processes underlying the development of reading, and who are familiar with the scientific research literature relating to the acquisition of reading, we are writing to you to express our ...
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2015
PurposeThis study compared the effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children wit... more PurposeThis study compared the effectiveness of two grammar treatment procedures for children with specific language impairment.MethodA double-blind superiority trial with cluster randomization was used to compare a cueing procedure, designed to elicit a correct production following an initial error, to a recasting procedure, which required no further production. Thirty-one 5-year-old children with specific language impairment participated in 8 small group, classroom-based treatment sessions. Fourteen children received the cueing approach and 17 received the recasting approach.ResultsThe cueing group made significantly more progress over the 8-week treatment period than the recasting group. There was a medium–large treatment effect in the cueing group and a negligible effect size in the recasting group. The groups did not differ in maintenance of treatment effects 8 weeks after treatment. In single-subject analyses, 50% of children in the cueing group and 12% in the recasting group ...
As researchers, psychologists, linguists and educators who have studied the processes underlying ... more As researchers, psychologists, linguists and educators who have studied the processes underlying the development of reading, and who are familiar with the scientific research literature relating to the acquisition of reading, we are writing to you to express our ...
Uploads
Papers