To conduct a comparison of physical and mechanical properties for 5 commonly used guidewires to a... more To conduct a comparison of physical and mechanical properties for 5 commonly used guidewires to assess advantages of wires for specific applications. Tests on guidewires (0.035" diameter; straight, flexible tip) included tip bending, shaft buckling, lubricity, and tip puncture measurements. Guidewires included 2 hybrid wires: the U-Nite (Bard Urological, Covington, GA) and the Sensor (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA). Our aim was to compare the stiffness of these hybrid wires with the standard Amplatz SuperStiff (Boston Scientific). Our second aim was to compare the hydrophilic tip of the hybrid wires with 2 traditional hydrophilic guidewires: the NiCore (Bard Urological) and RadiFocus glidewire (Boston Scientific). The Amplatz SuperStiff had a significantly stiffer shaft than either hybrid wire, with a buckling force of 1.81 ± 0.91 N compared with the Sensor (0.80 ± 0.29 N, P = .0002) and the U-Nite (0.77 ± 0.29 N, P < .0001). The Boston Scientific guidewire tips were less st...
To establish the baseline preoperative prevalence of Oxalobacter formigenes (OF) colonization in ... more To establish the baseline preoperative prevalence of Oxalobacter formigenes (OF) colonization in a cohort of obese patients scheduled for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and determine the effect of OF colonization on urinary oxalate excretion. It has been proposed that loss of OF colonization after RYGB may contribute to the development of hyperoxaluria. Adult patients scheduled to undergo RYGB were requested to provide a stool specimen and 24-hour urine collection before surgery. OF colonization status was determined by the calcium precipitation test. The 24-hour urine specimens were analyzed by the Litholink Corporation (Chicago, IL). Of the 51 patients submitting initial stool specimens, only 8 (16%) tested positive for OF, whereas 43 (84%) were negative. Patients colonized with OF were older than uncolonized subjects (52.9±6.8 vs 46.0±10.4 years, P=.03). Urinary oxalate was not significantly different between these groups (P=.14). OF colonization is uncommon in morbidly obese patients (16%) before surgery. Because hyperoxaluria develops in more than 50% of patients after RYGB, it is unlikely that loss of OF colonization is the primary cause.
Extrinsic ureteral compression challenges a ureteral stent&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;am... more Extrinsic ureteral compression challenges a ureteral stent&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;s ability to facilitate urinary drainage and to protect the kidney. Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of new metallic coil-based ureteral stents in terms of tensile strength and radial compression force. Three stent designs tested from Prosurg Inc included Passage 7.0F, Snake 6.0F, and Snake 7.0F with the straight section covered with a biocompatible polymer tubing. A MTS Microbionix Testing System using Testworks II software, vibration isolation table, and a 5-N load cell were used to measure tensile and compressive strength. Stents were placed in hydraulic grips and stretched at a rate of 5 mm/s for 1 second under uniaxial tension. Extrinsic compression was exerted in 0.1-mm increments to maximum compression. The Young Modulus, E, was calculated from each trial using engineering stress. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and t tests. The Passage, Snake 6F, and Snake 7F stents had tensile strengths of 27±3, 5±0.1, and 73±26 kPa, respectively. Mann-Whitney tests show statistically significant difference between stents (P&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;0.05). Elastic modulus needed to cause extrinsic compression was highest for Snake 6F (145,842±14332 Pa) compared with that of Passage (124,999±3182 Pa) and Snake 7F (126,132±19316 Pa), (P&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;0.05). The Snake 6F stent had the lowest tensile strength and was least resistant to extrinsic compression. The Snake 7F had the highest tensile strength and was most resistant to extrinsic compression. All three stents are more resistant to extrinsic compression than the Applied Silhouette or Cook Resonance, yet have lower tensile strengths.
To evaluate the radial dilation force and basket opening dynamics of three small (&amp;amp;am... more To evaluate the radial dilation force and basket opening dynamics of three small (&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;1.5F) stone baskets. Boston Scientific OptiFlex (1.3F), Cook N-Circle Nitinol Tipless Stone Extractor (1.5F), and Sacred Heart Medical Halo (1.5F) baskets were tested for radial dilation force in 10 repetitions using a floating block atop a stationary block secured to a digital scale. The floating block, attached to a plastic frame and base, pressed down on the scale to measure the radial dilation of the open basket while being passed through the cylindrical opening between the blocks. These same baskets were tested in triplicate for basket width in 0.5- to 2-mm length increments using a mechanical caliper under optical light microscope visualization to evaluate the linearity of basket opening and length at which target basket width (5 mm) was reached. The Sacred Heart Medical Halo had the best radial dilation (2.97 ± 0.22 g), followed by the Cook N-Circle (1.29 ± 0.04 g), and finally Boston Scientific OptiFlex (1.19 ± 0.12 g). The N-Circle was the only basket to exhibit linear opening, while the Halo exhibited an exponential curve. The OptiFlex exhibited a polynomial curve, with linear opening across the midrange of the basket length. From these curve equations, the target basket width (5 mm) was calculated. The N-Circle and the OptiFlex reached the target basket width at a basket length of 9.4 mm and 9.6 mm, respectively. The Halo reached the target basket width at a basket length of 11.5 mm. The radial dilation force differs significantly among commercial baskets and may affect ureteral stone extraction. Linear basket opening may provide the physician more control in stone retrieval.
Http Dx Doi Org 10 1089 End 2010 0312, Jan 19, 2011
Three small diameter (&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;1.5F) stone... more Three small diameter (&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;1.5F) stone baskets have recently been introduced. Our objective was to evaluate the stone capture rate of these baskets in an in vitro ureteral model and an in vitro caliceal model using novice, resident, and expert operators. Sacred Heart Medical Halo™ (1.5F), Cook N-Circle(®) Nitinol Tipless Stone Extractor (1.5F), and Boston Scientific OptiFlex(®) (1.3F) stone baskets were tested in an in vitro ureteral and a caliceal model by three novices, three residents, and three experts. The caliceal model consisted of a 7-cm length of 10-mm O.D. plastic tubing with a convex base. Each operator was timed during removal of a 3-mm calculus from each model with three repetitions for each basket. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance single factor tests and t tests assuming unequal variances. In the ureteral model, the Halo had the fastest average rate of stone extraction for experts and novices (0:02 ± 0:01 and 0:08 ± 0:04 min, respectively), as well as the overall fastest average stone extraction rate (0:08 ± 0:06 min). No statistical significant differences in extraction times between baskets were identified in the resident group. In the novice group, the Halo stone extraction rate was significantly faster than the OptiFlex (P=0.029). In the expert group, the OptiFlex had statistically significant slower average extraction rates compared with the Halo (P=0.005) and the N-Circle (P=0.017). In the caliceal model, no statistically significant differences were noted. While no significant differences were noted in extraction times for the caliceal model, the extraction times for the ureteral model were slowest with the OptiFlex basket. Other variables important in selection of the appropriate basket include operator preference, clinical setting, and cost.
To conduct a comparison of physical and mechanical properties for 5 commonly used guidewires to a... more To conduct a comparison of physical and mechanical properties for 5 commonly used guidewires to assess advantages of wires for specific applications. Tests on guidewires (0.035" diameter; straight, flexible tip) included tip bending, shaft buckling, lubricity, and tip puncture measurements. Guidewires included 2 hybrid wires: the U-Nite (Bard Urological, Covington, GA) and the Sensor (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA). Our aim was to compare the stiffness of these hybrid wires with the standard Amplatz SuperStiff (Boston Scientific). Our second aim was to compare the hydrophilic tip of the hybrid wires with 2 traditional hydrophilic guidewires: the NiCore (Bard Urological) and RadiFocus glidewire (Boston Scientific). The Amplatz SuperStiff had a significantly stiffer shaft than either hybrid wire, with a buckling force of 1.81 ± 0.91 N compared with the Sensor (0.80 ± 0.29 N, P = .0002) and the U-Nite (0.77 ± 0.29 N, P < .0001). The Boston Scientific guidewire tips were less st...
To establish the baseline preoperative prevalence of Oxalobacter formigenes (OF) colonization in ... more To establish the baseline preoperative prevalence of Oxalobacter formigenes (OF) colonization in a cohort of obese patients scheduled for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and determine the effect of OF colonization on urinary oxalate excretion. It has been proposed that loss of OF colonization after RYGB may contribute to the development of hyperoxaluria. Adult patients scheduled to undergo RYGB were requested to provide a stool specimen and 24-hour urine collection before surgery. OF colonization status was determined by the calcium precipitation test. The 24-hour urine specimens were analyzed by the Litholink Corporation (Chicago, IL). Of the 51 patients submitting initial stool specimens, only 8 (16%) tested positive for OF, whereas 43 (84%) were negative. Patients colonized with OF were older than uncolonized subjects (52.9±6.8 vs 46.0±10.4 years, P=.03). Urinary oxalate was not significantly different between these groups (P=.14). OF colonization is uncommon in morbidly obese patients (16%) before surgery. Because hyperoxaluria develops in more than 50% of patients after RYGB, it is unlikely that loss of OF colonization is the primary cause.
Extrinsic ureteral compression challenges a ureteral stent&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;am... more Extrinsic ureteral compression challenges a ureteral stent&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;s ability to facilitate urinary drainage and to protect the kidney. Our purpose was to evaluate the performance of new metallic coil-based ureteral stents in terms of tensile strength and radial compression force. Three stent designs tested from Prosurg Inc included Passage 7.0F, Snake 6.0F, and Snake 7.0F with the straight section covered with a biocompatible polymer tubing. A MTS Microbionix Testing System using Testworks II software, vibration isolation table, and a 5-N load cell were used to measure tensile and compressive strength. Stents were placed in hydraulic grips and stretched at a rate of 5 mm/s for 1 second under uniaxial tension. Extrinsic compression was exerted in 0.1-mm increments to maximum compression. The Young Modulus, E, was calculated from each trial using engineering stress. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and t tests. The Passage, Snake 6F, and Snake 7F stents had tensile strengths of 27±3, 5±0.1, and 73±26 kPa, respectively. Mann-Whitney tests show statistically significant difference between stents (P&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;0.05). Elastic modulus needed to cause extrinsic compression was highest for Snake 6F (145,842±14332 Pa) compared with that of Passage (124,999±3182 Pa) and Snake 7F (126,132±19316 Pa), (P&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;0.05). The Snake 6F stent had the lowest tensile strength and was least resistant to extrinsic compression. The Snake 7F had the highest tensile strength and was most resistant to extrinsic compression. All three stents are more resistant to extrinsic compression than the Applied Silhouette or Cook Resonance, yet have lower tensile strengths.
To evaluate the radial dilation force and basket opening dynamics of three small (&amp;amp;am... more To evaluate the radial dilation force and basket opening dynamics of three small (&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;1.5F) stone baskets. Boston Scientific OptiFlex (1.3F), Cook N-Circle Nitinol Tipless Stone Extractor (1.5F), and Sacred Heart Medical Halo (1.5F) baskets were tested for radial dilation force in 10 repetitions using a floating block atop a stationary block secured to a digital scale. The floating block, attached to a plastic frame and base, pressed down on the scale to measure the radial dilation of the open basket while being passed through the cylindrical opening between the blocks. These same baskets were tested in triplicate for basket width in 0.5- to 2-mm length increments using a mechanical caliper under optical light microscope visualization to evaluate the linearity of basket opening and length at which target basket width (5 mm) was reached. The Sacred Heart Medical Halo had the best radial dilation (2.97 ± 0.22 g), followed by the Cook N-Circle (1.29 ± 0.04 g), and finally Boston Scientific OptiFlex (1.19 ± 0.12 g). The N-Circle was the only basket to exhibit linear opening, while the Halo exhibited an exponential curve. The OptiFlex exhibited a polynomial curve, with linear opening across the midrange of the basket length. From these curve equations, the target basket width (5 mm) was calculated. The N-Circle and the OptiFlex reached the target basket width at a basket length of 9.4 mm and 9.6 mm, respectively. The Halo reached the target basket width at a basket length of 11.5 mm. The radial dilation force differs significantly among commercial baskets and may affect ureteral stone extraction. Linear basket opening may provide the physician more control in stone retrieval.
Http Dx Doi Org 10 1089 End 2010 0312, Jan 19, 2011
Three small diameter (&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;1.5F) stone... more Three small diameter (&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;1.5F) stone baskets have recently been introduced. Our objective was to evaluate the stone capture rate of these baskets in an in vitro ureteral model and an in vitro caliceal model using novice, resident, and expert operators. Sacred Heart Medical Halo™ (1.5F), Cook N-Circle(®) Nitinol Tipless Stone Extractor (1.5F), and Boston Scientific OptiFlex(®) (1.3F) stone baskets were tested in an in vitro ureteral and a caliceal model by three novices, three residents, and three experts. The caliceal model consisted of a 7-cm length of 10-mm O.D. plastic tubing with a convex base. Each operator was timed during removal of a 3-mm calculus from each model with three repetitions for each basket. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance single factor tests and t tests assuming unequal variances. In the ureteral model, the Halo had the fastest average rate of stone extraction for experts and novices (0:02 ± 0:01 and 0:08 ± 0:04 min, respectively), as well as the overall fastest average stone extraction rate (0:08 ± 0:06 min). No statistical significant differences in extraction times between baskets were identified in the resident group. In the novice group, the Halo stone extraction rate was significantly faster than the OptiFlex (P=0.029). In the expert group, the OptiFlex had statistically significant slower average extraction rates compared with the Halo (P=0.005) and the N-Circle (P=0.017). In the caliceal model, no statistically significant differences were noted. While no significant differences were noted in extraction times for the caliceal model, the extraction times for the ureteral model were slowest with the OptiFlex basket. Other variables important in selection of the appropriate basket include operator preference, clinical setting, and cost.
Uploads