Abstract The term ‘roots’ (‘riza’) is widely used in the Pontic-Greek language. It alludes to the relation between grandparents and grandchildren, suggestive of bonding and continuity through space and time. However, for the people...
moreAbstract
The term ‘roots’ (‘riza’) is widely used in the Pontic-Greek language. It alludes to the relation between grandparents and grandchildren, suggestive of bonding and continuity through space and time. However, for the people originally from the Black Sea Coast of Turkey, known as Pontic-Greeks/Pontians (‘Pontioi’), who found themselves in Georgia after the upheavals of the early twentieth century (World War I, 1914-18, the Russian Revolution, 1917, the Greek-Turkish War 1922-23), roots were always only one part of the story. Routes in various forms, such as migration, deportation and refugee-ness, seem always to have nourished their history, or at least its representation, with stories of fragmentation, violence and survival. Dislocation, relocation and evocation are central practices in the constitution of the ‘Greek Diaspora’ in Georgia today. My work draws upon this triangle of routes-roots-representation. I contextualise them within the interplay of national and international discourses revolving around the Cold War and its aftermath both in Georgia and Greece.
Which moments of dispersion and community building are embedded in the memories of these people? How do they intertwine with notions of modernity expressed in Soviet nationality policy and nation-state building in Greece? What is their role within the identity politics that has emerged following the fall of the Soviet Union, in Georgia and in Greece? How does the notion of ‘diaspora’ fit into these varied contexts and discourses? My examination of personal narratives and secondary sources leads me to argue that the notion of ‘diaspora’ is formed within debates concerning membership and belonging that have culminated during the last decades. Yet ‘diaspora’ is not pre-conditioned by these debates. The memories and practices of diaspora discussed here are entangled with past and present dilemmas, and can help us achieve a more subtle understanding of both.