- Please visit my pages at:
ResearchGate: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dominic_Glover
IDS: http://www.ids.ac.uk/person/dominic-glover
Twitter: https://twitter.com/domglovedit
In parts of Asia, rice is sometimes known as ‘the lazy man’s crop’ because it is perceived as an undemanding crop to grow. To grow rice well is more demanding, requiring careful management of inputs and resources. We consider crop... more
In parts of Asia, rice is sometimes known as ‘the lazy man’s crop’ because it is perceived as an undemanding crop to grow. To grow rice well is more demanding, requiring careful management of inputs and resources. We consider crop performance as the outcome of interaction among the rice genome, (agro-)ecology and management (GxExM). We focus on E and M components and distinguish between macro- and micro-level ExM interactions. Our argument shows that calling rice the ‘lazy man’s crop’ need not be understood as a pejorative label. An undemanding crop can help farmers manage the micro-level complexity of farming systems and allow them to pursue a sustainable livelihood strategy that works within the macro-level dynamics in which their framing systems function.
Research Interests:
... Friday, 8 July 2011. ... Features. ... Agri-biotech in sub-Saharan Africa: Facts and figures. Dominic Glover. 5 June 2007 | EN. USAID. Dominic Glover outlines the status of agricultural biotechnology research, development and... more
... Friday, 8 July 2011. ... Features. ... Agri-biotech in sub-Saharan Africa: Facts and figures. Dominic Glover. 5 June 2007 | EN. USAID. Dominic Glover outlines the status of agricultural biotechnology research, development and commercialisation in sub-Saharan Africa. ...
... Friday, 17 June 2011. ... Features. ... Agri-biotech in sub-Saharan Africa: Facts and figures. Dominic Glover. 5 June 2007 | EN. USAID. Dominic Glover outlines the status of agricultural biotechnology research, development and... more
... Friday, 17 June 2011. ... Features. ... Agri-biotech in sub-Saharan Africa: Facts and figures. Dominic Glover. 5 June 2007 | EN. USAID. Dominic Glover outlines the status of agricultural biotechnology research, development and commercialisation in sub-Saharan Africa. ...
... Agri-biotech in sub-Saharan Africa: Facts and figures. Dominic Glover. 5 June 2007 | EN. USAID. Dominic Glover outlines the status of agricultural biotechnology research, development and commercialisation in sub-Saharan Africa. ...
Genetically modified (GM, transgenic) crops are often invoked in debates about poverty, hunger, and agricultural development. The framing of GM crops as a ‘pro-poor’ and environmentally sustainable technology was partly a creation of the... more
Genetically modified (GM, transgenic) crops are often invoked in debates about poverty, hunger, and agricultural development. The framing of GM crops as a ‘pro-poor’ and environmentally sustainable technology was partly a creation of the biotechnology industry, but cannot be explained as merely a cynical exercise in public relations. Storylines about poverty alleviation and sustainable development actually helped to drive and shape the technical and commercial strategies of the leading transnational agribusiness company, Monsanto, during the 1970s, 80s and 90s. However, while those storylines emerged alongside the GM crop technologies that were being developed in the company's laboratories and greenhouses, they failed to influence their design or technological content. Nevertheless, the pro-poor and sustainability rhetoric contributed directly to a transformation of Monsanto's sectoral and geographical scope, to include a new focus on markets in developing countries. In principle, serving farmers in these markets could lead the company to develop new products and technologies that are designed to address the needs of resource-poor smallholders, but the evidence of such a change occurring is scant.
This paper explores the case of the Monsanto Smallholder Programme (shp), an initiative implemented by the US-based transnational biotechnology, agri-chemicals and seeds company, Monsanto, between 1999 and 2002. The programme was intended... more
This paper explores the case of the Monsanto Smallholder Programme (shp), an initiative implemented by the US-based transnational biotechnology, agri-chemicals and seeds company, Monsanto, between 1999 and 2002. The programme was intended to provide a package of agricultural extension support to ‘smallholders’ in selected developing countries. Based on empirical research in the USA and India, the paper examines why Monsanto came to undertake such an initiative, and how the company designed and implemented the programme. The paper traces the evolution of the shp over time and discusses the reasons why it was suddenly terminated in 2002. Drawing on insights from the literature on corporate social responsibility (csr), the paper argues that the shp represented an attempt to ‘mainstream’ the values and principles of sustainability into Monsanto's operations, but that this led to the distinctive philanthropic and developmental aspects of the programme being undermined by competing commercial and financial pressures.