[go: up one dir, main page]

Lompat ke isi

Eksklusi sosial

Dari Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia, ensiklopedia bebas

Eksklusi sosial, peminggiran sosial, atau marginalisasi sosial adalah tindakan penyingkiran atau pengucilan ke pinggiran masyarakat. Ini adalah istilah yang banyak digunakan di Eropa dan pertama kali dipakai di Prancis.[1] Istilah ini digunakan dalam berbagai bidang ilmu yang meliputi edukasi, sosiologi, psikologi, politik dan ekonomi.

Referensi

[sunting | sunting sumber]
  1. ^ Hilary Silver, “Social Exclusion and Social Solidarity.” International Labour Review 133, nos. 5-6 (1994): 531-78.

Daftar pustaka

[sunting | sunting sumber]
  • Power, A., Wilson, W.J., 2000, Social Exclusion and the Future of Cities, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, London
  • Li Yi. The Structure and Evolution of Chinese Social Stratification. University Press of America, 2005, ISBN 0-7618-3331-5
  • Frank Moulaert, Erik Swyngedouw and Arantxa Rodriguez. The Globalized City: Economic Restructing and Social Polarization in European Cities. Oxford University Press, 2003, ISBN 978-0-19-926040-9
  • Philippe Van Parijs, Real Freedom for All: What (if anything) can justify capitalism?, 1995. ISBN 978-0-19-829357-6
  • Gilles Deleuze, A Thousand Plateaus, 1980.
  • John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, 1971. ISBN 978-0-674-01772-6
  • Karl Marx, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844
  • University of Georgia (2006, November 9). Social Exclusion Changes Brain Function And Can Lead To Poor Decision-making. ScienceDaily. Retrieved February 29, 2008, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/11/061108154256.htm
  • Giddens, Anthony, Introduction to Sociology. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2009. Print.
  • Applebaum, Richard P., Carr, deborah, Duneier, Mitchell, Giddens, Anthony. "Introduction to Sociology Seventh Edition" 2009.
  • URSPIC: An EU Research Project to measure impacts of urban development projects on social exclusion
  • Alphonse, M., George, P & Moffat, K. (2007). Redefining social work standards in the context of globalization: Lessons from India. International Social Work.
  • Ferguson, I., Lavalette, M., & Whitmore, E. (2005). Globalization, Global Justice and Social Work. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Mullaly, B. (2007). Oppression: The focus of structural social work. In B. Mullaly, The new structural social work (pp. 252–286). Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
  • Sakamoto I., & R.O Pitner. (2005). Use of critical consciousness in anti-oppressive social work practice: disentangling power dynamics at personal and structural levels. British Journal of Social Work 35, pp. 435–452.
  • Sewpaul, V. (2006). The global-local dialectic: Challenges for Africa scholarship and social work in a post-colonial world, British Journal of Social Work 36, pp. 419–434.
  • Wilson A. & Beresford P. (2000). Anti-oppressive practice': Emancipation or appropriation? British Journal of Social Work 30, pp. 553–573.
  • Yee, J. Y. & Dumbrill, G.C. (2003). Whiteout: Looking for Race in Canadian Social Work Practice. In A. Al-Krenawi & J.R. Graham (Eds.) Multicultural Social Work in Canada: Working with Diverse Ethno-Racial Communities (pp. 98–121). Toronto: Oxford Press.

Pranala luar

[sunting | sunting sumber]