Knowledge Combination Analysis Reveals That Artificial Intelligence Research Is More Like "Normal Science" Than "Revolutionary Science"
Files
Date
2024-01-03
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Narrator
Transcriber
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
5598
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) research is intrinsically innovative and serves as a source of innovation for research and development in a variety of domains. There is an assumption that AI can be considered "revolutionary science" rather than "normal science." Using a dataset of nearly 300,000 AI publications, this paper examines the co-citation dynamics of AI research and investigates its trajectory from the perspective of knowledge creation as a combinatorial process. We found that while the number of AI publications grew significantly, they largely follows a normal science trajectory characterized by incremental and cumulative advancements. AI research that combines existing knowledge in highly conventional ways is a substantial driving force in AI and has the highest scientific impact. Radically new ideas are relatively rare. By offering insights into the co-citation dynamics of AI research, this work contributes to understanding its evolution and guiding future research directions.
Description
Keywords
Value, Success, and Performance Measurements of Knowledge, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Systems, academic publications, artificial intelligence, knowledge combination, novelty, scientific research
Citation
Extent
10 pages
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Related To (URI)
Table of Contents
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.