Add trial_tokens key to specification
#791
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Adds information on the `trial_tokens` key to the specification, based on the proposal [1]. The proposal is quite in depth but I have kept the specification more limited as I don't think we neccessarily need to specify each algorithm here. [1] w3c#598
rdcronin
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2025
Co-authored-by: rdcronin <rdcronin@users.noreply.github.com>
oliverdunk
commented
Apr 4, 2025
xeenon
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2025
mukul-p
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2025
|
@zombie Just adding a quick reminder here, I know you had a few conversations you wanted to have internally 😄 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds information on the
trial_tokenskey to the specification, based on the proposal [1]. The proposal is quite in depth but I have kept the specification more limited as I don't think we neccessarily need to specify each algorithm here and the motivation is not something we need in normative text.[1] #598