10000 'successfully navigate' to 'more easily proceed' Intent 3.3.9: Redundant Entry · Issue #2436 · w3c/wcag · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

'successfully navigate' to 'more easily proceed' Intent 3.3.9: Redundant Entry #2436

Closed
jake-abma opened this issue May 17, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3033
Closed

'successfully navigate' to 'more easily proceed' Intent 3.3.9: Redundant Entry #2436

jake-abma opened this issue May 17, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3033
Labels
3.3.7 Redundant Entry Survey - Added Understanding WCAG 2.2

Comments

@jake-abma
Copy link
Contributor

First sentence Intent 3.3.9: Redundant Entry:
https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/redundant-entry.html

The intent of this Success Criterion is to ensure that users can successfully navigate multi-step processes. It reduces cognitive effort where information is asked for more than once during steps in a process. It also reduces the need to recall information provided in a previous step.

  1. I don't think 'navigate' is the proper way to describe the intent. It's more like 'more easily proceed'
  2. 'reduces cognitive effort' seems the same as 'reduces the need to recall information' but illustrated as an 'extra' thing by the word 'also'

Change:

The intent of this Success Criterion is to ensure that users can successfully navigate multi-step processes. It reduces cognitive effort where information is asked for more than once during steps in a process. It also reduces the need to recall information provided in a previous step.

To:

The intent of this Success Criterion is to ensure that users can more easily proceed multi-step processes. It reduces cognitive effort by reducing the need to recall information asked for more than once during steps in a process.
@bruce-usab
Copy link
Contributor
bruce-usab commented May 17, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Editorial: proceed multi-step processes. Proceed through multistep processes? Progress a multistep process?

I am okay with "navigate" even though it is different than navigating a webpage or menu. It seems to me that proceed/progress/process are all very similar and linear, and "navigate" reflects that maybe the processes are not so straightforward to work through, at least not for some people.

alastc added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2023
@alastc
Updating the intent
4e608f0 
Closes #2436
@alastc alastc mentioned this issue Feb 16, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
3.3.7 Redundant Entry Survey - Added Understanding WCAG 2.2
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Updating the intent w3c/wcag
4 participants
@alastc @jake-abma @fstrr @bruce-usab
0