8000 editorial: de-dupe a clause, shorten to principles-based, puncts by tantek · Pull Request #184 · w3c/AB-public · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

tantek
Copy link
Contributor
@tantek tantek commented Sep 30, 2024
  • de-dupe "empower an equitable, informed, and interconnected society", preferring actual citation/quotation to EWP rather than copy/pasting their work
  • summarize with "principles-based" in-place, thus explicitly centering our principles in our technical work, and thus connecting that to expanding upon "principles" both later in this section and the next section
  • serial comma update per original in EWP

This PR resolves part of #167


Preview | Diff

* de-dupe "empower an equitable, informed, and interconnected society", preferring actual citation/quotation to EWP rather than copy/pasting their work
* summarize with "principles-based" in-place, thus explicitly centering our principles in our technical work, and thus connecting that to expanding up on "principles" both later in this section and the next section
* serial comma update per original in EWP
@tantek tantek requested a review from cwilso September 30, 2024 21:15
@tantek tantek changed the title editorial: de-dupe a clause, shorten to principles-based, puncts [Vision] editorial: de-dupe a clause, shorten to principles-based, puncts Sep 30, 2024
@tantek tantek added the Project Vision Vision and Principles label Sep 30, 2024
@tantek tantek changed the title [Vision] editorial: de-dupe a clause, shorten to principles-based, puncts editorial: de-dupe a clause, shorten to principles-based, puncts Sep 30, 2024
@cwilso
Copy link
Collaborator
cwilso commented Sep 30, 2024

I still think this is less impactful without connecting the "why" in the initial line, but I'm going to go with being overruled.

@fantasai
Copy link
Contributor

I can see arguments in both directions, and would like to hear from others to decide between this PR and #182

Copy link
Contributor Author
@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As this is editorial, I don't think it needs wider committee review before landing. If someone comes up with something that's being lost or an opportunity to add something meaningful, we can iterate accordingly.

@tantek tantek merged commit e9cb601 into main Oct 1, 2024
4 checks passed
@tantek tantek deleted the tantek-patch-3 branch October 1, 2024 00:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Project Vision Vision and Principles
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0