Add license MIT #93
Add license MIT #93
Conversation
| @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | |||
| The MIT License (MIT) | |||
|
|
|||
| Copyright (c) 2016 netx.js developers | |||
|
|
||
| ## License | ||
|
|
||
| MIT |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On Hyper, Zeit wanted to omit the this License section from README and set the license in the repo settings so it shows like this:
Someone with the needed rights needs to add that, so we can omit it from README.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LICENSE file is explicit and git hosting agnostic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@iamstarkov yeah, I agree the LICENSE file should be in the repo, but I think we don't need it added to the README.
BTW, the license is also declared in package.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
got it.
though, it might seems a bit redundant, but its kind of standard of to declare license type in the pkg and in the end of README file, and specify full license text in LICENSE.
Im not suggesting to add License section to README, rather pointing out how convenient it is
| @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | |||
| The MIT License (MIT) | |||
|
|
|||
| Copyright (c) 2016 next.js developers | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think copyright should include Zeit, Inc..
| @@ -378,3 +378,4 @@ The following issues are currently being explored and input from the community i | |||
| - Tony Kovanen ([@tonykovanen](https://twitter.com/tonykovanen)) – ▲ZEIT | |||
| - Guillermo Rauch ([@rauchg](https://twitter.com/rauchg)) – ▲ZEIT | |||
| - Dan Zajdband ([@impronunciable](https://twitter.com/impronunciable)) – Knight-Mozilla / Coral Project | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you remove it since it's not related to license ?
And please squash all commits to one.
|
Thank you! |
No description provided.