[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor dockerfiles and update gitattributes #2743

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

kpango
Copy link
Collaborator
@kpango kpango commented Nov 14, 2024

Description

SSIA

Related Issue

Versions

  • Vald Version: v1.7.14
  • Go Version: v1.23.3
  • Rust Version: v1.82.0
  • Docker Version: v27.3.1
  • Kubernetes Version: v1.31.2
  • Helm Version: v3.16.2
  • NGT Version: v2.3.4
  • Faiss Version: v1.9.0

Checklist

Special notes for your reviewer

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced handling of file normalization during commits through a new command in the pre-commit hook.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling in Dockerfiles with the addition of a directive for stricter error checking during builds.
  • Chores
    • Updated .gitattributes for consistent text encoding and end-of-line handling across various file types, enhancing clarity in diffs and managing binary files effectively.

Signed-off-by: kpango <kpango@vdaas.org>
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the .gitattributes file to specify text encoding, end-of-line (EOL) handling, and merge strategies for various file types. Additionally, several Dockerfiles have been modified to include a new directive for error handling during the build process. The updates enhance file management and error handling across the repository.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.gitattributes Added entries for various file types specifying text encoding, EOL handling, binary attributes, merge strategies, and export-ignore rules.
dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; minor formatting change.
dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; minor formatting change.
dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; minor formatting change.
dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; minor formatting change.
dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/dev/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/example/client/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; minor formatting change.
dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; minor formatting change.
dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; updated RUN commands for better caching.
dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; no changes to commands.
dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; updated RUN commands for better caching.
dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; updated RUN commands for better caching.
dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile Added # check=error=true for error handling; updated RUN commands for better caching.
hack/git/hooks/pre-commit Added command to renormalize line endings for staged files.

Suggested labels

size/XXL, area/makefile, area/internal, area/gateway/lb, area/gateway/filter

Suggested reviewers

  • hlts2
  • vankichi
  • kmrmt

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@kpango has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d7951d and 0e71b0f.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@kpango kpango requested review from a team, kmrmt and datelier and removed request for a team November 14, 2024 07:28
@vdaas-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.

  • 🙆‍♀️ /approve - approve
  • 🍱 /format - format codes and add licenses
  • /gen-test - generate test codes
  • 🏷️ /label - add labels
  • 🔚 2️⃣ 🔚 /label actions/e2e-deploy - run E2E deploy & integration test

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
hack/git/hooks/pre-commit (1)

Line range hint 18-40: Consider moving renormalization outside the Go files check.

The renormalization command is currently only executed when Go files are changed. Consider moving it outside the if block to ensure all staged files get normalized regardless of their type.

 if git diff HEAD^ --name-only | grep ".go$" > /dev/null; then
     cp go.mod ${TMPDIR}
     cp go.sum ${TMPDIR}
 
     # format go code
     make format/go
     make format/go/test
 
     # go build
     echo "Run go build..."
     go build -mod=readonly ./...
     echo "go build finished."
 
     if [ `git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD` = "main" ]; then
         # golangci-lint
         echo "Run golangci-lint..."
         make go/lint
         echo "golangci-lint finished."
     fi
     mv -f ${TMPDIR}/go.mod .
     mv -f ${TMPDIR}/go.sum .
-    git diff --cached --name-only | xargs -r git add --renormalize
 fi
+
+# Ensure consistent file encodings for all staged files
+git diff --cached --name-only | xargs -r git add --renormalize
dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile (1)

Line range hint 1-89: Excellent Dockerfile structure and practices!

The Dockerfile demonstrates several best practices:

  • Efficient caching strategy using mount caches for apt and Go builds
  • Security-focused configuration with distroless base image and nonroot user
  • Clear multi-stage build pattern reducing final image size

Consider documenting these practices in a central location to ensure consistency across all Dockerfiles in the project.

dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile (2)

Line range hint 38-45: Excellent build optimization with mount caching!

The RUN command has been optimized with several mount options that provide significant benefits:

  • Proper caching of apt packages and Go build artifacts
  • Temporary storage using tmpfs
  • Locked sharing for concurrent builds
  • Architecture-specific caching with ${TARGETARCH}

This will improve build performance and reproducibility.

Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of each mount for better maintainability.


Line range hint 46-71: Consider organizing package installations for better readability.

The package installation commands follow good practices but could be more organized.

Consider grouping related packages:

     && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing \
-    build-essential \
-    ca-certificates \
-    curl \
-    tzdata \
-    locales \
-    git \
+    # Build tools
+    build-essential \
+    git \
+    # System requirements
+    ca-certificates \
+    curl \
+    # Localization
+    tzdata \
+    locales \
dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile (2)

1-2: LGTM! Enhanced error checking is a good practice.

The addition of # check=error=true directive will help catch build issues early by enabling strict error checking during the build process.

This enhancement aligns with best practices for container builds by failing fast when issues are detected.


Line range hint 3-89: Consider additional build optimizations while maintaining current best practices.

The current implementation already includes several good practices:

  • Using BuildKit mounts for efficient caching
  • Proper locale and timezone setup
  • Security-focused configuration with non-root user
  • Distroless base image

However, consider these potential optimizations:

 RUN --mount=type=bind,target=.,rw \
     --mount=type=tmpfs,target=/tmp \
     --mount=type=cache,target=/var/lib/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \
     --mount=type=cache,target=/var/cache/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \
     --mount=type=cache,target="${GOPATH}/pkg",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \
     --mount=type=cache,target="${HOME}/.cache/go-build",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \
     --mount=type=tmpfs,target="${GOPATH}/src" \
     set -ex \
     && echo 'Binary::apt::APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages "true";' > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/keep-cache \
     && echo 'APT::Install-Recommends "false";' > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/no-install-recommends \
     && apt-get clean \
     && apt-get update -y \
-    && apt-get upgrade -y \
     && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing \
+    && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing --no-upgrade \
     build-essential \
     ca-certificates \
     curl \
     tzdata \
     locales \
     git \
+    && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* \
     && ldconfig \

These changes would:

  1. Remove the full upgrade step which isn't necessary for a build container
  2. Add explicit --no-upgrade flag to apt-get install
  3. Clean up apt lists to reduce image size
dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile (1)

Line range hint 30-40: LGTM! Excellent cache configuration, with a minor readability suggestion.

The mount configurations are well structured with proper cache sharing and locking:

  • Apt cache is properly shared and locked
  • Go build cache is architecture-specific
  • Temporary mounts use tmpfs for better performance

Consider grouping related mount options for better readability:

 RUN --mount=type=bind,target=.,rw \
     --mount=type=tmpfs,target=/tmp \
+    --mount=type=tmpfs,target="${GOPATH}/src" \
     # APT caches
     --mount=type=cache,target=/var/lib/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \
     --mount=type=cache,target=/var/cache/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \
+    # Go build caches
     --mount=type=cache,target="${GOPATH}/pkg",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \
     --mount=type=cache,target="${HOME}/.cache/go-build",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \
-    --mount=type=tmpfs,target="${GOPATH}/src" \
dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile (2)

Line range hint 45-52: Excellent use of BuildKit mount options

The addition of various mount types optimizes the build process:

  • Bind mount for source code
  • Tmpfs for temporary files
  • Cache mounts for apt packages and Go build artifacts
  • Proper cache sharing configuration with architecture-specific IDs

This will significantly improve build performance and reduce disk I/O.


Line range hint 53-86: Consider splitting the RUN command for better maintainability

While the current implementation is functionally correct, the RUN command is quite long and handles multiple concerns. Consider splitting it into logical groups:

  1. System package installation
  2. Locale and timezone setup
  3. Go installation and build

Example refactor:

-RUN --mount=type=bind,target=.,rw \
+# System dependencies
+RUN --mount=type=cache,target=/var/lib/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \
+    --mount=type=cache,target=/var/cache/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \
+    set -ex \
+    && echo 'Binary::apt::APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages "true";' > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/keep-cache \
+    && echo 'APT::Install-Recommends "false";' > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/no-install-recommends \
+    && apt-get update -y \
+    && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends build-essential ca-certificates curl tzdata locales git cmake g++ gcc libssl-dev unzip libhdf5-dev libaec-dev
+
+# Locale and timezone
+RUN set -ex \
+    && echo "${LANG} UTF-8" > /etc/locale.gen \
+    && ln -fs /usr/share/zoneinfo/${TZ} /etc/localtime \
+    && locale-gen ${LANGUAGE} \
+    && update-locale LANG=${LANGUAGE} \
+    && dpkg-reconfigure -f noninteractive tzdata
+
+# Build application
+RUN --mount=type=bind,target=.,rw \
     --mount=type=tmpfs,target=/tmp \
-    --mount=type=cache,target=/var/lib/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \
-    --mount=type=cache,target=/var/cache/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \
     --mount=type=cache,target="${GOPATH}/pkg",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \
     --mount=type=cache,target="${HOME}/.cache/go-build",id="go-build-${TARGETARCH}" \
-    --mount=type=tmpfs,target="${GOPATH}/src" \
-    && echo 'Binary::apt::APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages "true";' > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/keep-cache \
-    ...rest of the command...
dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile (1)

Line range hint 57-95: Consider adding inline comments for complex mount options.

While the RUN command is well-structured with optimized caching strategies, it would benefit from inline documentation explaining the purpose of each mount type and cache configuration.

Example documentation to add:

 RUN --mount=type=bind,target=.,rw \
+    # Use tmpfs for temporary files to speed up builds
     --mount=type=tmpfs,target=/tmp \
+    # Cache apt packages to speed up subsequent builds
     --mount=type=cache,target=/var/lib/apt,sharing=locked,id=${APP_NAME} \
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c52696 and 3d7951d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • hack/docker/gen/main.go is excluded by !**/gen/**
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
  • .gitattributes (1 hunks)
  • dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/dev/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/example/client/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • hack/git/hooks/pre-commit (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (18)
  • dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile
  • dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile
  • dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile
  • dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile
  • dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile
  • dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile
  • dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile
  • dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile
  • dockers/dev/Dockerfile
  • dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile
  • dockers/example/client/Dockerfile
  • dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile
  • dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile
  • dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile
  • dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile
  • dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile
  • dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile
  • dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile
🔇 Additional comments (24)
hack/git/hooks/pre-commit (1)

40-40: LGTM! Good addition of git renormalization.

The addition of git add --renormalize helps ensure consistent file encodings and line endings across different environments, which is especially important for a cross-platform project.

.gitattributes (3)

18-36: Well-structured text file configurations

The text file configurations are comprehensive and follow best practices:

  • Consistent encoding and line ending settings
  • Appropriate diff drivers for language-specific files
  • Clear linguist language hints where needed

57-57: LGTM: Proper vendor directory configuration

Correctly marks vendor directory as vendored code for GitHub language statistics.


59-64: LGTM: Comprehensive export ignore configurations

The export ignore configurations properly exclude all common temporary and system-specific files.

dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile (2)

89-89: LGTM! ENTRYPOINT configuration is correct.

The ENTRYPOINT is properly configured using:

  • Exec form syntax [] which is recommended over shell form
  • Correct binary path that matches the COPY instruction
  • Runs after setting nonroot user for security

2-2: LGTM! Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles.

The addition of # check=error=true is a good practice as it enables stricter error checking during the build process.

Let's verify if this directive is consistently applied across other Dockerfiles:

✅ Verification successful

The check=error=true directive is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles

The verification shows that all Dockerfiles in the repository have the # check=error=true directive properly set in their headers, demonstrating consistent application of this best practice across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of error checking directive across Dockerfiles
# Expected: All Dockerfiles should have the same error checking directive

# Search for Dockerfiles and check for the presence of check=error directive
fd Dockerfile$ | while read -r file; do
  echo "=== $file ==="
  head -n 3 "$file" | grep -E "^#\s*check=error"
done

Length of output: 5327

dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile (3)

Line range hint 83-89: LGTM! Follows security best practices.

The final stage implements several security best practices:

  • Uses minimal distroless base image
  • Runs as nonroot user
  • Contains only necessary artifacts

Line range hint 1-89: Verify consistency across all Dockerfiles.

Let's ensure these improvements are consistently applied across all Dockerfiles in the project.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check consistency of Dockerfile configurations
# Expect: All Dockerfiles should follow similar patterns

# Check for key elements across all Dockerfiles
fd Dockerfile$ | while read -r file; do
  echo "=== Checking $file ==="
  echo "1. Error checking:"
  grep "check=error=true" "$file" || echo "Missing error checking"
  echo "2. Mount caching:"
  grep "mount=type=cache" "$file" || echo "Missing cache mounts"
  echo "3. Security:"
  grep "nonroot:nonroot" "$file" || echo "Missing nonroot user"
  echo "4. Base images:"
  grep "FROM gcr.io/distroless" "$file" || echo "Not using distroless"
  echo "---"
done

1-2: LGTM! Enhanced error checking enabled.

The addition of check=error=true directive improves build reliability by enabling stricter error checking during the build process.

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! Error checking directive is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles

The verification confirms that the check=error=true directive has been uniformly applied across all Dockerfiles in the repository, which is a good practice for maintaining consistent build reliability.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent error checking across all Dockerfiles
# Expect: All Dockerfiles should have the same error checking directive

# Check if all Dockerfiles have the error checking directive
fd Dockerfile$ | while read -r file; do
  echo "Checking $file:"
  grep -A 1 "syntax = docker/dockerfile:latest" "$file"
done

Length of output: 23606

dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile (4)

2-2: LGTM! Good addition of strict error checking.

The check=error=true directive enables strict error checking during the Docker build process, which helps catch potential issues early in the build pipeline.


89-89: LGTM! Proper ENTRYPOINT configuration.

The ENTRYPOINT is correctly configured using exec form and points to the copied binary.


Line range hint 85-87: LGTM! Secure configuration using distroless and nonroot user.

The final stage follows security best practices with minimal attack surface.

Let's verify the sample config file exists and is consistent:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify sample config file existence and contents
# Expect: The sample.yaml file should exist and contain valid configuration

# Check if the sample config file exists
fd -t f "sample.yaml" cmd/index/job/creation/

# If found, verify it's a valid YAML file
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
  cat cmd/index/job/creation/sample.yaml | grep -v '^#' | grep .
fi

Line range hint 44-48: LGTM! Excellent use of BuildKit mount options for optimization.

The mount configuration follows best practices:

  • Bind mount for source code
  • Tmpfs for temporary directories
  • Shared caches for apt and go build with proper locking

Let's verify the cache mount paths are consistent across other Dockerfiles:

✅ Verification successful

The previous search didn't yield the expected results. Let's try with a broader search pattern to find cache mount configurations in Dockerfiles.


Let's try with a more basic approach using find and grep to locate the mount configurations in Dockerfiles.


We've confirmed the apt cache mounts are consistent across all Dockerfiles. Let's also check for Go-specific cache mounts to ensure complete verification of build caches.


Cache mount configurations are consistent across Dockerfiles

The verification shows that all Dockerfiles consistently use the same cache mount configuration:

  • Bind mount for source code with target=.,rw
  • Tmpfs mount for temporary files with target=/tmp
  • Apt cache mounts with proper locking:
    • /var/lib/apt and /var/cache/apt with sharing=locked and id=${APP_NAME}

The cache paths and sharing configuration are uniform across all instances, ensuring optimal build caching behavior.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check cache mount paths consistency across Dockerfiles
# Expect: Similar cache mount configurations in other Dockerfiles

rg --type dockerfile 'type=cache,target=' dockers/

Length of output: 5616


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try again with the correct path and search pattern
rg --type dockerfile -A 3 'RUN.*--mount=type=cache' dockers/

Length of output: 97


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RUN commands with mount options in all Dockerfile files
find dockers -type f -name "Dockerfile" -exec grep -A 3 "RUN.*--mount" {} \;

Length of output: 5029


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check for Go-specific cache mounts since this is a Go project
find dockers -type f -name "Dockerfile" -exec grep -A 3 "type=cache,target=/go" {} \;

Length of output: 86

dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile (1)

88-88: Verify the existence and validity of the configuration file.

The Dockerfile copies cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml into the container. Let's ensure this file exists and contains valid configuration.

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify the actual configuration file being copied in the Dockerfile.


Let me check if the file exists at the correct source path and examine its contents.


Configuration file exists and is properly formatted

The configuration file cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml exists and contains a valid, well-structured YAML configuration for the index deletion service. The file includes all necessary sections:

  • Server configuration (gRPC and health check servers)
  • Deleter configuration with agent settings
  • Observability settings
  • Logging configuration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and format of the configuration file

# Check if the config file exists
if [ -f "cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml" ]; then
    echo "Config file exists"
    # Basic YAML validation
    python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml'))" 2>/dev/null
    if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
        echo "Valid YAML format"
    else
        echo "Invalid YAML format"
    fi
else
    echo "Config file not found"
fi

Length of output: 256


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the Dockerfile for the COPY instruction of the config file
rg -A 2 "COPY.*\.ya?ml" dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile

Length of output: 169


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the file exists and show its contents
if [ -f "cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml" ]; then
    echo "File exists. Contents:"
    cat "cmd/index/job/deletion/sample.yaml"
else
    # Search for similar yaml files in case of path mismatch
    echo "File not found. Searching for similar yaml files:"
    fd -e yaml -e yml . cmd/index/job/deletion/
fi

Length of output: 6230

dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile (2)

2-2: LGTM! Good practice enabling strict error checking.

The addition of # check=error=true directive ensures that the build will fail if any error occurs during the build process, improving build reliability.


89-89: LGTM! Secure configuration with distroless base and nonroot user.

The ENTRYPOINT configuration is correct and the overall setup follows security best practices by:

  • Using distroless base image to reduce attack surface
  • Running as nonroot user
  • Properly configuring the entrypoint
dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile (2)

Line range hint 89-97: Final stage setup follows security best practices

The final stage is well-configured:

  • Uses distroless base image for minimal attack surface
  • Copies only necessary artifacts
  • Runs as non-root user

2-2: Verify consistent error checking across Dockerfiles

The addition of # check=error=true is a good practice for stricter error handling during builds.

Let's verify if this directive is consistently applied across other Dockerfiles:

✅ Verification successful

The previous output shows that the paths are different but doesn't show if the directive content is consistent. Let's verify the exact directive content across all Dockerfiles.


BuildKit error checking directive is consistently applied

The # check=error=true directive is uniformly applied across all Dockerfiles in the repository, indicating a consistent approach to error handling during builds. This is a good practice that is already standardized across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if all Dockerfiles have the same error checking directive
rg -l "^# check=error" | grep -i dockerfile > /tmp/with_check
find . -type f -name "Dockerfile*" > /tmp/all_dockerfiles
diff /tmp/with_check /tmp/all_dockerfiles

Length of output: 2092


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of the error directive in Dockerfiles
rg "^# check=error" --no-filename | sort | uniq

Length of output: 68

dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile (3)

Line range hint 28-82: LGTM! Build configuration follows best practices.

The build stage is well-configured with:

  • Efficient use of BuildKit cache mounts
  • Proper package installation and cleanup
  • Correct locale and timezone setup

Line range hint 84-98: LGTM! Final stage follows security best practices.

The final stage is well-configured with:

  • Minimal distroless base image
  • Non-root user execution
  • Only necessary artifacts copied

2-2: LGTM! Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles.

The addition of # check=error=true is a good practice for strict error checking during builds.

Let's verify if this directive is consistently applied across other Dockerfiles:

✅ Verification successful

The check=error=true directive is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles

The verification shows that the BuildKit error checking directive is already standardized across all 26 Dockerfiles in the repository, including agent components, gateways, tools, and other services. This confirms that the addition in the NGT Dockerfile aligns with the project's established practices.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if other Dockerfiles have the same error checking directive
fd -t f -e Dockerfile . | while read -r file; do
    echo "=== $file ==="
    head -n 3 "$file"
done

Length of output: 40


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with ripgrep to find Dockerfiles and their content
rg --type-add 'docker:*Dockerfile*' --type docker -l "" 
echo "=== Dockerfile contents ==="
rg --type-add 'docker:*Dockerfile*' --type docker -A 3 "^#.*check.*error.*true" 

Length of output: 7005

dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile (3)

Line range hint 27-54: LGTM! Well-structured build configuration.

The build configuration demonstrates good practices:

  • Multi-stage build for optimized image size
  • Secure base image selection (distroless)
  • Clear environment variable organization

110-110: LGTM! Properly configured ENTRYPOINT.

The ENTRYPOINT is correctly formatted using array syntax and includes all necessary parameters for the helm-operator.


2-2: LGTM! Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles.

The addition of # check=error=true is a good practice as it enables stricter error checking during the build process.

Let's verify if this directive is consistently used across other Dockerfiles:

✅ Verification successful

The check=error=true directive is consistently used across all Dockerfiles

The verification shows that the check=error=true directive is already present in all Dockerfiles across the repository, confirming consistent usage of this best practice for strict error checking during builds.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if other Dockerfiles have the same error checking directive
rg -l "^# check=error" $(fd Dockerfile)

Length of output: 1837

.gitattributes Show resolved Hide resolved
.gitattributes Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.gitattributes Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously requested changes Nov 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
hack/git/hooks/pre-commit (2)

40-40: Consider moving the renormalization outside the Go-specific block

While the addition of Git renormalization is good, its current placement inside the Go-specific condition means it only runs when Go files are modified. This could miss renormalization of other file types.

Consider moving it outside the if block:

if git diff HEAD^ --name-only | grep ".go$" > /dev/null; then
    # ... Go-specific operations ...
    mv -f ${TMPDIR}/go.mod .
    mv -f ${TMPDIR}/go.sum .
-    git diff --cached --name-only | xargs -r git add --renormalize
fi
+git diff --cached --name-only | xargs -r git add --renormalize

Pre-commit hook lacks executable permissions (644), needs to be set to 755

The pre-commit hook currently has read-write permissions (644) but lacks executable permissions required for Git hooks to function properly. The file permissions need to be updated to 755.

  • File: hack/git/hooks/pre-commit
    • Current: -rw-r--r-- (644)
    • Required: -rwxr-xr-x (755)
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-40: Verify the pre-commit hook permissions

The script needs to be executable to function as a Git hook.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the pre-commit hook is executable
# Expected: File should have execute permission (755 or similar)

ls -l hack/git/hooks/pre-commit

# Also verify if it's properly linked in .git/hooks
if [ -d .git/hooks ]; then
  ls -l .git/hooks/pre-commit
fi

Length of output: 132

.gitattributes (2)

18-37: LGTM! Consider adding configurations for additional file types.

The file-specific configurations are well-structured with appropriate encodings and diff drivers. Consider adding configurations for additional common file types in your project:

  • .sh for shell scripts
  • .toml for TOML configuration files
  • .gradle for Gradle build files
  • .properties for Java properties files

39-49: Consider adding more binary file types

The binary and LFS configurations are good, but consider adding these common binary formats:

  • .jar for Java archives
  • .war for Web archives
  • .ear for Enterprise archives
  • .dll for Windows libraries
  • .exe for Windows executables
  • .lib for static libraries
dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile (1)

Line range hint 46-77: Consider optimizing apt-get commands

While the current implementation is good, consider combining the apt-get commands to reduce layers and improve build efficiency:

- && apt-get clean \
- && apt-get update -y \
- && apt-get upgrade -y \
- && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing \
+ && apt-get update -y && apt-get upgrade -y \
+ && DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing \
dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile (1)

Line range hint 46-82: Well-structured build configuration with efficient caching

The build configuration demonstrates excellent practices:

  • Proper use of BuildKit cache mounts for apt and Go build artifacts
  • Efficient package management with clear cleanup
  • Good use of tmpfs for temporary storage
  • Appropriate locale and timezone configuration

Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of each mount type for better maintainability.

dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile (1)

Line range hint 45-96: Excellent use of Docker build optimizations

The RUN command implements several best practices for optimizing Docker builds:

  • Uses mount options for efficient caching
  • Properly manages apt package lists
  • Combines commands to reduce layers
  • Sets up locale and timezone correctly

However, consider adding explicit versions for system packages to ensure reproducible builds.

Consider adding version pinning for critical system packages:

     && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends --fix-missing \
-    build-essential \
-    ca-certificates \
+    build-essential=12.9 \
+    ca-certificates=20230311 \
dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile (1)

Line range hint 1-97: Add build documentation

The Dockerfile implements several advanced features and optimizations. Consider adding comments to document:

  1. The purpose of each mount cache
  2. Required build arguments
  3. Expected environment setup

Example documentation to add:

 # syntax = docker/dockerfile:latest
 # check=error=true
+# Build Arguments:
+#   - GO_VERSION: Version of Go to install
+#   - RUST_VERSION: Version of Rust to install
+#   - TARGETARCH: Target architecture for the build
+#   - TARGETOS: Target operating system for the build
+# Cache Mounts:
+#   - /var/lib/apt: APT package lists
+#   - /var/cache/apt: APT package cache
+#   - ${GOPATH}/pkg: Go module cache
+#   - ${HOME}/.cache/go-build: Go build cache
dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile (2)

1-2: Excellent addition of error checking directive!

The check=error=true directive enables stricter error checking during the Docker build process, which helps catch potential issues early in the build pipeline.

This is a good practice that should be consistently applied across all Dockerfiles in the project for better build reliability.


Line range hint 63-71: Consider pinning package versions for better reproducibility

While the package installation is well-structured, consider pinning specific versions of essential packages for better build reproducibility and security.

Example modification:

- build-essential \
- ca-certificates \
- curl \
- tzdata \
- locales \
- git \
- upx \
+ build-essential=12.9 \
+ ca-certificates=20230311 \
+ curl=7.88.1-10 \
+ tzdata=2023c-5 \
+ locales=2.36-9 \
+ git=1:2.39.2-1.1 \
+ upx=4.0.2-1 \
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c52696 and 3d7951d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • hack/docker/gen/main.go is excluded by !**/gen/**
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
  • .gitattributes (1 hunks)
  • dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/dev/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/example/client/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
  • hack/git/hooks/pre-commit (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (20)
  • dockers/agent/core/faiss/Dockerfile
  • dockers/agent/core/ngt/Dockerfile
  • dockers/agent/sidecar/Dockerfile
  • dockers/binfmt/Dockerfile
  • dockers/buildbase/Dockerfile
  • dockers/buildkit/Dockerfile
  • dockers/buildkit/syft/scanner/Dockerfile
  • dockers/ci/base/Dockerfile
  • dockers/dev/Dockerfile
  • dockers/discoverer/k8s/Dockerfile
  • dockers/example/client/Dockerfile
  • dockers/gateway/filter/Dockerfile
  • dockers/gateway/lb/Dockerfile
  • dockers/gateway/mirror/Dockerfile
  • dockers/index/job/correction/Dockerfile
  • dockers/index/job/creation/Dockerfile
  • dockers/index/job/deletion/Dockerfile
  • dockers/index/job/readreplica/rotate/Dockerfile
  • dockers/index/job/save/Dockerfile
  • dockers/manager/index/Dockerfile
🔇 Additional comments (17)
.gitattributes (1)

57-64: LGTM! Export ignore rules are comprehensive.

The vendor directory handling and export ignore rules are well-configured and follow best practices.

dockers/agent/core/agent/Dockerfile (3)

Line range hint 30-96: LGTM! Excellent build optimization practices.

The RUN command demonstrates several Docker best practices:

  • Efficient use of mount options for caching and temporary storage
  • Proper apt configuration and cleanup
  • Well-organized dependency installation

97-97: LGTM! Follows security best practices.

The final stage configuration:

  • Uses a minimal distroless base image
  • Runs as nonroot user
  • Contains only the necessary binary

2-2: LGTM! Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles.

The addition of # check=error=true is a good practice as it enables strict error checking during the build process.

Let's verify if this directive is consistently applied across other Dockerfiles:

✅ Verification successful

The check=error=true directive is consistently applied across all Dockerfiles

The verification shows that all Dockerfiles in the repository have the # check=error=true directive properly set in their headers, demonstrating consistent implementation of this best practice for strict error checking during builds.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of error checking directive across Dockerfiles
# Expected: All Dockerfiles should have the same error checking directive

echo "Checking Dockerfiles for error checking directive..."
fd -t f "Dockerfile$" | while read -r file; do
    echo "=== $file ==="
    head -n 3 "$file" | grep -E "^# check=error"
done

Length of output: 5395

dockers/tools/benchmark/operator/Dockerfile (3)

2-2: LGTM: Enhanced error handling during build

The addition of check=error=true is a good practice that ensures builds fail explicitly on errors rather than potentially continuing with issues.


89-89: LGTM: Secure configuration with proper permissions

The ENTRYPOINT configuration combined with nonroot user and distroless base image provides a secure runtime environment.


Line range hint 1-89: Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles

Since this is part of a larger Dockerfile refactoring effort, let's verify that similar improvements are consistently applied across other Dockerfiles in the repository.

✅ Verification successful

Dockerfile configurations are consistently applied across the repository

The verification shows that all application Dockerfiles consistently follow the same security and configuration patterns:

  • Error directive check=error=true is present in all application Dockerfiles
  • All application containers use nonroot:nonroot user configuration
  • All application images are based on gcr.io/distroless for minimal attack surface

The only Dockerfiles not following these patterns are infrastructure-related ones (buildbase, buildkit, ci, dev) which have different requirements.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in Dockerfile configurations across the repository

# Check for error directive in other Dockerfiles
echo "Checking for error directive consistency:"
fd -t f "Dockerfile$" | xargs grep -l "check=error=true"

# Check for proper user configuration
echo -e "\nChecking for nonroot user configuration:"
fd -t f "Dockerfile$" | xargs grep -l "USER nonroot:nonroot"

# Check for proper base images
echo -e "\nChecking for distroless usage:"
fd -t f "Dockerfile$" | xargs grep -l "FROM gcr.io/distroless"

Length of output: 2797

dockers/index/operator/Dockerfile (2)

89-89: LGTM: Proper ENTRYPOINT configuration

The ENTRYPOINT is correctly configured to run the index-operator binary with appropriate permissions and user context.


2-2: Verify BuildKit directive compatibility

The # check=error=true directive enables strict error checking during builds, which is good for catching issues early. However, we should ensure all build environments support this feature.

✅ Verification successful

BuildKit directive is consistently used across the project

The # check=error=true directive is used consistently across all Dockerfiles in the project (found in 26 Dockerfiles), indicating it's a standardized practice in the codebase. Since this is a widely adopted pattern within the project and BuildKit has been a stable feature since Docker 18.09, this directive is safe to use.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other Dockerfiles in the repository use similar directives
# and verify the Docker version requirements

# Check for similar directives in other Dockerfiles
echo "Checking other Dockerfiles for BuildKit directives..."
fd -t f "Dockerfile$" | xargs rg "^#\s*check=error"

# Look for minimum Docker version requirements in documentation
echo "Checking for Docker version requirements..."
fd -t f "README.md$" | xargs rg -i "docker(\s+)version|buildkit"

Length of output: 1726

dockers/tools/benchmark/job/Dockerfile (3)

97-97: LGTM: Secure container configuration

The final stage implements security best practices:

  • Uses distroless base image
  • Runs as nonroot user
  • Clear and simple entrypoint

Line range hint 1-97: Verify Dockerfile generator code

Since this Dockerfile is generated by hack/docker/gen/main.go, we should ensure the changes are made in the generator code rather than directly in this file.

✅ Verification successful

The verification results show that:

  1. The check=error=true directive exists in the generator code (hack/docker/gen/main.go)
  2. The directive is consistently present across all generated Dockerfiles

Changes are correctly implemented in the generator code

The modification is properly implemented in the generator template and consistently applied across all generated Dockerfiles, ensuring uniformity in the build configuration.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that changes are reflected in the generator code

# Check the generator file
echo "Checking generator code for new directives:"
rg -A 5 "check=error=true" hack/docker/gen/main.go || true

# Verify if other generated Dockerfiles are consistent
echo -e "\nChecking consistency across generated Dockerfiles:"
fd Dockerfile | xargs grep -l "DO_NOT_EDIT.*generated" | \
  xargs grep -l "check=error=true" || true

Length of output: 1655


2-2: Verify the impact of strict error checking

The addition of # check=error=true enables strict error checking during the Docker build process. This is a good practice for catching build issues early, but we should verify it doesn't break existing builds.

✅ Verification successful

The check=error=true directive is consistently used across generated Dockerfiles

The verification shows that this directive is systematically applied across all generated Dockerfiles in the repository (25 files found), indicating it's an intentional standardization implemented through the generator code in hack/docker/gen/main.go. This is a controlled change that maintains consistency across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other Dockerfiles in the repository have similar error checking
# and verify build success rates before/after this change.

# Find all Dockerfiles and check for error directive
echo "Checking error directives in other Dockerfiles:"
fd Dockerfile | xargs grep -l "check=error=true" || true

# Check build history to identify potential issues
echo -e "\nChecking recent build history:"
gh run list --workflow="Build" --limit 10 --json conclusion,createdAt,displayTitle \
  | jq -r '.[] | "\(.createdAt) \(.conclusion) \(.displayTitle)"'

Length of output: 1655

dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile (3)

97-97: Verify sample configuration file existence

The Dockerfile copies a sample configuration file to /etc/server/config.yaml. Ensure this file exists and contains valid configuration.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and validity of the sample configuration

# Check if sample.yaml exists
echo "Checking for sample configuration:"
fd "sample.yaml" -p "cmd/tools/cli/loadtest/"

# Verify YAML syntax if file exists
if [ -f "cmd/tools/cli/loadtest/sample.yaml" ]; then
  echo "Validating YAML syntax:"
  cat "cmd/tools/cli/loadtest/sample.yaml" | python3 -c "import sys, yaml; yaml.safe_load(sys.stdin)"
fi

Line range hint 82-82: Verify HDF5 installation security

The make hdf5/install command installs HDF5, which is a complex dependency. Ensure that:

  1. The installation source is secure
  2. The version is pinned
  3. Known vulnerabilities are checked
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check HDF5 installation method and version pinning

# Check HDF5 installation method in Makefile
echo "HDF5 installation method:"
rg "hdf5/install" -A 5

# Look for version pinning
echo "HDF5 version specification:"
rg "HDF5_VERSION" --type make

1-2: Verify the impact of strict error checking

The addition of check=error=true enforces stricter error handling during builds, which is good for production reliability. However, this might affect existing CI/CD pipelines.

Consider adding this directive to all Dockerfiles in the repository for consistent error handling.

✅ Verification successful

This script will help us see the headers of all Dockerfiles to better understand the usage of BuildKit directives and error checking across the codebase.


No changes needed - error checking is consistently used

The check=error=true directive is already consistently implemented across all Dockerfiles in the repository. This shows it's an established pattern in the project, making the change in this file aligned with the project's standards.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other Dockerfiles in the repository use similar error checking
# to ensure consistency across builds

# Search for Dockerfiles without error checking
echo "Dockerfiles without error checking:"
fd Dockerfile | while read -r file; do
  if ! grep -q "check=error=true" "$file"; then
    echo "- $file"
  fi
done

Length of output: 6338


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for Dockerfiles and their error checking directives more thoroughly
echo "=== Checking Dockerfiles for error checking directives ==="
fd Dockerfile | while read -r file; do
  echo "=== $file ==="
  head -n 5 "$file"
  echo "---"
done

Length of output: 7765

dockers/operator/helm/Dockerfile (2)

Line range hint 98-110: Excellent security practices in the final stage!

The final stage implements several security best practices:

  • Using distroless base image minimizes attack surface
  • Running as nonroot user enhances security
  • Minimal file copying reduces image size

Let's verify the security posture:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify security best practices in Dockerfile
# Check for any root user references or sensitive file permissions

# Check for root user references
rg -i "USER\s+root" dockers/operator/helm/

# Check for any sensitive file permission changes
rg -i "chmod\s+777" dockers/operator/helm/

Line range hint 1-110: Verify consistency across other Dockerfiles

Since this file is auto-generated, let's ensure the improvements (error checking directive, security practices) are consistently applied across all Dockerfiles.

✅ Verification successful

Security best practices and error checking are consistently applied

The verification shows that all service-related Dockerfiles consistently implement:

  • Error checking directive (check=error=true)
  • Distroless base images for runtime
  • Non-root user execution

The differences in implementation counts are expected as some Dockerfiles (like buildbase, buildkit, etc.) are build-time containers that require root access and different base images.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency of Dockerfile improvements across the project

# Check for error directive in other Dockerfiles
echo "Checking for error directive in Dockerfiles:"
fd Dockerfile$ | xargs grep -l "check=error=true"

# Check for distroless usage
echo "Checking for distroless usage:"
fd Dockerfile$ | xargs grep -l "gcr.io/distroless/static:nonroot"

# Check for nonroot user
echo "Checking for nonroot user:"
fd Dockerfile$ | xargs grep -l "USER nonroot:nonroot"

Length of output: 2720

.gitattributes Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.gitattributes Show resolved Hide resolved
kmrmt
kmrmt previously approved these changes Nov 14, 2024
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <kpango@vdaas.org>
Copy link
cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Deploying vald with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 0e71b0f
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://b71e1fda.vald.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://refactor-docker-dockergen-an.vald.pages.dev

View logs

@kpango kpango merged commit 229f851 into main Nov 14, 2024
176 of 183 checks passed
@kpango kpango deleted the refactor/docker/dockergen-and-gitattributes branch November 14, 2024 07:56
vdaas-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
* refactor dockerfiles and update gitattributes

Signed-off-by: kpango <kpango@vdaas.org>

* Update .gitattributes

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <kpango@vdaas.org>

---------

Signed-off-by: kpango <kpango@vdaas.org>
Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <kpango@vdaas.org>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
kpango added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
* refactor dockerfiles and update gitattributes

Signed-off-by: kpango <kpango@vdaas.org>

* Update .gitattributes

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <kpango@vdaas.org>

---------

Signed-off-by: kpango <kpango@vdaas.org>
Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <kpango@vdaas.org>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: kpango <kpango@vdaas.org>
vankichi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
* refactor dockerfiles and update gitattributes



* Update .gitattributes




---------

Signed-off-by: kpango <kpango@vdaas.org>
Signed-off-by: Yusuke Kato <kpango@vdaas.org>
Co-authored-by: Yusuke Kato <kpango@vdaas.org>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants