-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
feat(eslint-plugin): [naming-convention] add support for #private
modifier on class members
#6259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(eslint-plugin): [naming-convention] add support for #private
modifier on class members
#6259
Conversation
Numbers for TypeModifiers are changed as instructed by the comment in the Modifiers enum
Thanks for the PR, @hlysine! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6259 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.27% 91.27%
=======================================
Files 366 366
Lines 12445 12447 +2
Branches 3645 3646 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 11359 11361 +2
Misses 772 772
Partials 314 314
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks! 🚀
This rule & its tests don't quite adhere to the same standards the rest of the codebase does, such as having one behavior under test per test case... eventually I'll have the energy to file an issue about cleaning it up. Eventually. 🫠
PR Checklist
#private
members #6258Overview
Currently, a class member with a private identifier (
#private
) is essentially treated as one with apublic
modifier. This PR adds the#private
modifier option to target this kind of member.