10000 docs(eslint-plugin): no-unnecessary-type-assertion: Add non-null operator example by bradzacher · Pull Request #253 · typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

docs(eslint-plugin): no-unnecessary-type-assertion: Add non-null operator example #253

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 12, 2019
Merged

docs(eslint-plugin): no-unnecessary-type-assertion: Add non-null operator example #253

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 12, 2019

Conversation

bradzacher
Copy link
Member

Closes #252

Wasn't clear that this rule handled it from the docs, so I added an example

armano2
armano2 previously approved these changes Feb 12, 2019
View reviewed changes
@bradzacher bradzacher merged commit 7be5657 into master Feb 12, 2019
@bradzacher bradzacher deleted the bradzacher-patch-1 branch February 12, 2019 02:33
@bradzacher bradzacher added the documentation Documentation ("docs") that needs adding/updating label Feb 12, 2019
kaicataldo pushed a commit to kaicataldo/typescript-eslint that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
@armano2 @JamesHenry
[CHORE] Add shields to readme (typescript-eslint#253)
1d7f5d8
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@armano2 armano2 armano2 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Documentation ("docs") that needs adding/updating
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rule Proposal: no unnecessary non-null assertion
2 participants
@bradzacher @armano2
0