8000 Repo: Improve CI performance to avoid throttling · Issue #11204 · typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Repo: Improve CI performance to avoid throttling #11204

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
JoshuaKGoldberg opened this issue May 12, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Repo: Improve CI performance to avoid throttling #11204

JoshuaKGoldberg opened this issue May 12, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
repo maintenance things to do with maintenance of the repo, and not with code/docs triage Waiting for team members to take a look

Comments

@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member
JoshuaKGoldberg commented May 12, 2025

Suggestion

According to https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/actions/metrics/usage, our biggest total minutes in the last month are:

  1. ci.yml (linux): 17,478 minutes across 425 runs
  2. ci.yml (windows): 7,610 minutes across 207 runs
  3. semantic-breaking-change-pr.yml: 613 minutes across 359 runs
  4. semantic-pr-titles.yml: 282 minutes across 282 runs
  5. a11y-alt-bot.yml: 201 minutes across 201 runs

17478 / 245 = >70 minutes of CI time per commit. That's quite a lot! We've started to see more GHA throttling recently. Jobs/runs have been getting stuck waiting to start -> then for GHA runners to free up.

Filing this issue as a general one: what can we do to reduce the throttling in CI?

Additional Info

These more specific issues are split out of or generally related to this one:

💖

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
repo maintenance things to do with maintenance of the repo, and not with code/docs triage Waiting for team members to take a look
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant
0