8000 [Cookbook][Workflow] Mention alternatives to GitHub by bicpi · Pull Request #3215 · symfony/symfony-docs · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[Cookbook][Workflow] Mention alternatives to GitHub #3215

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 27, 2013
Merged

[Cookbook][Workflow] Mention alternatives to GitHub #3215

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 27, 2013

Conversation

bicpi
Copy link
Contributor
@bicpi bicpi commented Nov 21, 2013
Q A
Doc fix? no
New docs? yes
Applies to all
Fixed tickets -

I think it would be fair to mention alternatives to GitHub. As Bitbucket offers free private repos and is also quite popular, I mentioned it explicitly. In addition, there's a link to a comparision of web-hosting services for VCS.

Do not hesitate to fix my English...

@wouterj
10000
Copy link
Member
wouterj commented Nov 21, 2013

I don't think we should add opiniated stuff to our docs. Just adding BitBucket seems correct to me, but telling why you should choose one of the other is out of the scope of our docs imo

@bicpi
Copy link
Contributor Author
bicpi commented Nov 21, 2013

Yes, the "why mentioning these hosters" is not part of the PR changes.

It simply felt wrong to read that GitHub is the easiest way to store a project but that you cannot have private repos for free. That's why I thought to mention Bitbucket as an alternative, because it has a similiar feature set but with free private repos - good to know for companies to get started.

Moreover, the changes generalize Git hosting and mention two popular hosters as an example now.

hosting service like `GitHub`_ or `Bitbucket`_. In GitHub, public repositories
are free, however you will need to pay a monthly fee to host private repositories.
In Bitbucket, you can also host private repositories for free, however they are
limited in the number of collaborators. Of course, there are more services out
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bicpi Contrary to what you said in your comment, you are explaining reasons to choose between them here, and this is what @wouterj asked to remove

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually the reason for this PR was that the current version mentions details about GitHub: Public repositories are free, however you will need to pay a monthly fee to host private repositories

So what about this proposal: Do not mention any details about plans and pricing (they could even change over time) and just suggest GitHub and Bitbucket? That it, keep the PR changes less this sentence: In GitHub, public repositories are free, however you will need to pay a monthly fee to host private repositories. In Bitbucket, you can also host private repositories for free, however they are limited in the number of collaborators.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, that is want I meaned. Just add bitbucket to the first sentence and remove the other stuff

The easiest way to store your project on a remote server is via a web-based
hosting service like `GitHub`_ or `Bitbucket`_. Of course, there are more
services out there, you can start your research with a
`comparision of hosting services`_.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

comparison

weaverryan added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2013
[Cookbook][Workflow] Mention alternatives to GitHub
@weaverryan weaverryan merged commit 9aa4289 into symfony:2.2 Nov 27, 2013
@weaverryan
Copy link
Member

I like it!

@bicpi bicpi deleted the git_hosting_alternatives branch January 5, 2014 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
0