[DomCrawler] added support for query string with slash #7434
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Link\getUri() failed to return correct uri when current query string contains slash
fabpot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2013
This PR was merged into the 2.1 branch. Commits ------- e6b7515 [DomCrawler] added support for query string with slash Discussion ---------- [DomCrawler] added support for query string with slash | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Bug fix? | no | New feature? | yes | BC breaks? | no | Deprecations? | no | Tests pass? | yes | Fixed tickets | | License | MIT | Doc PR | Link\getUri() failed to return correct uri when current query string contains slash Test pass on branch 2.1 but fails on master
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link\getUri() failed to return correct uri when current query string contains slash
Test pass on branch 2.1 but fails on master