-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
Routing options #6738
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Routing options #6738
Conversation
it uses an attribute list instead of multiple scheme/method elements that I also experimented with
public function setPattern($pattern) | ||
{ | ||
$this->pattern = $pattern; | ||
$this->path = $pattenr; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
I agree it should be done in 2.2. Thanks for working on it. |
@@ -100,10 +100,10 @@ private function compilePattern(Route $route, $pattern, $isHostname) | |||
$isSeparator = '' !== $precedingChar && false !== strpos(static::SEPARATORS, $precedingChar); | |||
|
|||
if (is_numeric($varName)) { | |||
throw new \DomainException(sprintf('Variable name "%s" cannot be numeric in route pattern "%s". Please use a different name.', $varName, $pattern)); | |||
throw new \DomainException(sprintf('Variable name "%s" cannot be numeric in route path "%s". Please use a different name.', $varName, $pattern)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
path still wrong (multiple occurences also below)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oops, sorry, fixed now.
@fabpot "Everything is BC" until it breaks BC in 3.0, that's why I'd like to see deprecations in PR summary what do you think ? |
it would also be great to update the CHANGELOG with deprecations (it could also help people answering your question) |
@vicb: I've just updated the CHANGELOG and created the UPGRADE file for 3.0. |
@fabpot thanks. |
@@ -115,12 +142,38 @@ public function getPattern() | |||
* @param string $pattern The pattern | |||
* | |||
* @return Route The current Route instance | |||
* | |||
* @deprecated Deprecated in 2.3, to be removed in 3.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should say it's deprecated in 2.2 since we want to merge it there. Also please mention to use
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
This PR was merged into the master branch. Commits ------- 9fc7def added the UPGRADE file for Symfony 3.0 e84cad2 [Routing] updated CHANGELOG 65eca8a [Routing] added new schemes and methods options to the annotation loader 5082994 [Routing] renamed pattern to path b357caf [Routing] renamed hostname pattern to just hostname e803f46 made schemes and methods available in XmlFileLoader d374e70 made schemes and methods available in YamlFileLoader 2834e7e added scheme and method setter in RouteCollection 10183de make scheme and method requirements first-class citizen in Route Discussion ---------- Routing options | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Bug fix? | no | New feature? | no | BC breaks? | no | Deprecations? | yes | Tests pass? | yes | Fixed tickets | #5989, #5990, #6049 | License | MIT In #5989, it has unanimously been decided to renamed `hostname_pattern` to `hostname` and `pattern` to `path`. That makes a lot of sense and I would like to do the renaming now as `hostname_pattern` is new in Symfony 2.2, so I'd like to avoid breaking BC just after the release. As we are modifying the route options, I've also included changes introduced by @Tobion in #6049 which were discussed in #5990. As everything is BC, I think it's wise to include that in 2.2. What do you think? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by Tobion at 2013-01-14T18:25:53Z I agree it should be done in 2.2. Thanks for working on it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by vicb at 2013-01-14T23:11:12Z @fabpot "Everything is BC" until it breaks BC in 3.0, that's why I'd like to see [deprecations in PR summary](symfony/symfony-docs#2116) what do you think ? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by vicb at 2013-01-14T23:16:40Z it would also be great to update the CHANGELOG with deprecations (it could also help people answering your question) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by fabpot at 2013-01-15T07:07:03Z @vicb: I've just updated the CHANGELOG and created the UPGRADE file for 3.0. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by vicb at 2013-01-15T07:15:32Z @fabpot thanks.
We should also change the arguments of |
schemes: https | ||
requirements: { 'id': '\d+' } | ||
|
||
<route id="article_edit" pattern="/article/{id}" methods="POST PUT" schemes="https"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should be path
here as it is the after example right?
In #5989, it has unanimously been decided to renamed
hostname_pattern
tohostname
andpattern
topath
. That makes a lot of sense and I would like to do the renaming now ashostname_pattern
is new in Symfony 2.2, so I'd like to avoid breaking BC just after the release. As we are modifying the route options, I've also included changes introduced by @Tobion in #6049 which were discussed in #5990.As everything is BC, I think it's wise to include that in 2.2. What do you think?