-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
[DI] Implement PSR-11 #21265
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
[DI] Implement PSR-11 #21265
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I chose to have
ContainerInterface
extendPsrContainerInterface
, so that any interface is marked as psr-compliant. Not sure it is the right thing to do though, because php cannot enforce all the contracts defined in the interface docs (like what exception to throw when). Tell me if you feel I should remove this and addimplements ContainerInterface
in the main implementation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it works for PHP, fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that basically means in whole framework you will not use
Psr
version, butSymfony
version.Then, one will be able to use concrete class that implements
Symfony
version as parameter for method expectingPsr
version, but not the other way around. So, if I will have some package that followsPsr
, I won't be able to use it directly in Symfony project, because everywhere the framework will requireSymfony
version insteadThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure I get what you mean, but IMO once this is merged, we should hunt for the
Symfony
version everywhere, see what calls are made there, and if we can replace usePsr
version as type hinting there.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@greg0ire without breaking BC, with the benefit of reducing the feature-set for the shake of PSR11 compliance? I doubt this is ever going to happen...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jvasseur yes it does
the issue is that
$foo instanceof A
implies that calling$foo->test($anotherInstanceOfA)
is allowed.Since
$anInstanceofB instanceof A
, calling$anInstanceofB->test($anotherInstanceOfAButNotB)
must thus be allowed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So… I found a bug in php?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a know limitation of the PHP engine : https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=69612#1431343525
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But your example is wrong anyway, functions parameters could be contravariant (they are invariant in PHP) meaning they can accept a wider type. In your example they are covariant instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh you're right, my logic was wrong indeed! Which means this would indeed be a BC-break, sorry I got confused.