-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
Tag missing internals #20626
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tag missing internals #20626
Conversation
Q | A |
---|---|
Branch? | 2.7 |
Bug fix? | no |
New feature? | no |
BC breaks? | no |
Deprecations? | no |
Tests pass? | yes |
Fixed tickets | N/A |
License | MIT |
Doc PR | N/A |
👍 Status: reviewed |
* @param \DOMElement $node | ||
* | ||
* @throws \LogicException When choice provided is not multiple nor radio | ||
* | ||
* @internal Should not be used by user-land code. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment doesn't add anything to the annotation, I'd suggest removing it, same below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. I've added this one for consistency with other occurrences in the codebase (https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/Form/ChoiceList/Factory/CachingFactoryDecorator.php#L51 for instance).
Anyway, I've removed it including original comments.
👍 |
1 similar comment
👍 |
Thank you @ogizanagi. |
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch. Discussion ---------- Tag missing internals | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Branch? | 2.7 | Bug fix? | no | New feature? | no | BC breaks? | no | Deprecations? | no | Tests pass? | yes | Fixed tickets | N/A | License | MIT | Doc PR | N/A Commits ------- 97e94b4 Tag missing internals