8000 [5.7][Parse] Set missing contextual keyword token kind for `async` by bnbarham · Pull Request #59518 · swiftlang/swift · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

[5.7][Parse] Set missing contextual keyword token kind for async #59518

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2022
Merged

[5.7][Parse] Set missing contextual keyword token kind for async #59518

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2022

Conversation

bnbarham
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-picks 862f3fc (#58912) which fixes async to be a contextual keyword rather than an identifier.

Resolves rdar://93080331.

@bnbarham bnbarham added the r5.7 label Jun 17, 2022
@bnbarham bnbarham requested a review from airspeedswift June 17, 2022 00:19
@bnbarham bnbarham requested a review from a team as a code owner June 17, 2022 00:19
@bnbarham
Copy link
Contributor Author

swiftlang/swift-syntax#467

@swift-ci please test

@bnbarham bnbarham mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2022
Merged
@bnbarham
Copy link
Contributor Author

swiftlang/swift-syntax#467

@swift-ci please test macOS platform

@bnbarham bnbarham merged commit ad66aa4 into swiftlang:release/5.7 Jun 17, 2022
@bnbarham bnbarham deleted the cherry-async-syntax branch June 17, 2022 23:32
@AnthonyLatsis AnthonyLatsis added 🍒 release cherry pick Flag: Release branch cherry picks swift 5.7 labels Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@airspeedswift airspeedswift airspeedswift approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🍒 release cherry pick Flag: Release branch cherry picks swift 5.7
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@bnbarham @airspeedswift @AnthonyLatsis
0