8000 Feature/stack companion by madster456 · Pull Request #769 · stack-auth/stack-auth · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

madster456
Copy link
Collaborator
@madster456 madster456 commented Jul 15, 2025

Important

Introduces Stack Companion with a right-side panel for docs, feature requests, changelog, and support, along with a new feedback form and improved feature request handling.

  • New Features:
    • Adds StackCompanion component for right-side panel with Docs, Feature Requests, Changelog, and Support in sidebar-layout.tsx and stack-companion.tsx.
    • Introduces FeedbackForm component in feedback-form.tsx with success/error states and contact links.
  • Feature Requests:
    • Implements GET, POST, and upvote routes in route.tsx and [featureRequestId]/upvote/route.tsx for feature requests with SSO and upvote syncing.
    • Adds FeatureRequestBoard component in feature-request-board.tsx for managing feature requests.
  • Changelog:
    • Adds ChangelogWidget component in changelog-widget.tsx to display recent updates.
  • Version Checking:
    • Refactors version checking logic into version-check.ts and updates VersionAlerter in version-alerter.tsx.
  • Miscellaneous:
    • Allows remote images from featurebase-attachments.com in next.config.mjs.
    • Removes old FeedbackDialog and docs/middleware.ts.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 8baf5e1. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Right-side Stack Companion panel: Docs, Feature Requests (browse, submit, upvote), Changelog, and Support.
    • In-app Feedback form with success/error states and contact links.
  • Improvements

    • Feature Requests: SSO integration and upvote syncing with backend.
    • Changelog viewer: loads and formats recent entries.
    • Remote images allowed from featurebase-attachments.com.
    • Consolidated version-checking for streamlined alerts.
  • Removals

    • Old Feedback dialog and docs middleware removed.

madster456 and others added 5 commits July 14, 2025 15:29
This is a merge commit the virtual branches in your workspace.

Due to GitButler managing multiple virtual branches, you cannot switch back and
forth between git branches and virtual branches easily. 

If you switch to another branch, GitButler will need to be reinitialized.
If you commit on this branch, GitButler will throw it away.

Here are the branches that are currently applied:
 - dashboard_docs (refs/gitbutler/dashboard_docs)
   branch head: 7202731
   - apps/dashboard/src/app/api/sso/featurebase/route.ts
   - apps/dashboard/src/app/api/feature-request/route.ts
   - apps/dashboard/.env
   - docker/readme.md
   - apps/dashboard/src/app/sso/featurebase/page.tsx
   - apps/dashboard/src/components/stack-companion.tsx
   - apps/backend/.env
   - apps/dashboard/src/components/stack-companion/changelog-widget.tsx
   - apps/dashboard/src/components/stack-companion/feature-request-board.tsx
   - apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/sidebar-layout.tsx
For more information about what we're doing here, check out our docs:
https://docs.gitbutler.com/features/virtual-branches/integration-branch
- Add user ID as primary identifier for feature requests to handle email changes
- Store user ID in customInputValues for post creation
- Add changelog widget component with Next.js Image optimization
- Fix React hooks exhaustive-deps warnings with useCallback
- Remove deprecated featurebase SSO route files
Copy link
vercel bot commented Jul 15, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
stack-backend Ready Preview Comment Aug 12, 2025 7:56pm
stack-dashboard Ready Preview Comment Aug 12, 2025 7:56pm
stack-demo Ready Preview Comment Aug 12, 2025 7:56pm
stack-docs Ready Preview Comment Aug 12, 2025 7:56pm

@CLAassistant
Copy link
CLAassistant commented Jul 15, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link
recurseml bot commented Jul 15, 2025

😱 Found 1 issue. Time to roll up your sleeves! 😱

🗒️ View all ignored comments in this repo
  • The constraint 'TokenStoreType extends string' is too restrictive. It should likely be 'TokenStoreType extends string | object' to match the condition check in line 113 where TokenStoreType is checked against {}
  • Return type mismatch - the interface declares useUsers() returning ServerUser[] but the Team interface that this extends declares useUsers() returning TeamUser[]
  • There is a syntax error in the super constructor call due to the ellipsis operator used incorrectly. Objects aren't being merged correctly. This syntax usage can lead to runtime errors when trying to pass the merged object to 'super()'. Verify that the intended alterations to the object occur before or outside of the super() call if needed.
  • Throwing an error when no active span is found is too aggressive. The log function should gracefully fallback to console.log or another logging mechanism when there's no active span, since not all execution contexts will have an active span. This makes the code less resilient and could break functionality in non-traced environments.

📚 Relevant Docs

  • Function sets backendContext with a new configuration but doesn't pass 'defaultProjectKeys'. Since defaultProjectKeys is required in the type definition and cannot be updated (throws error if tried to set), this will cause a type error.
  • The schema is using array syntax for pick() which is incorrect for Yup schemas. The pick() method in Yup expects individual arguments, not an array. Should be changed to: emailConfigSchema.pick('type', 'host', 'port', 'username', 'sender_name', 'sender_email')

📚 Relevant Docs

  • Creating a refresh token with current timestamp as expiration means it expires immediately. Should set a future date for token expiration.
  • The 'tools' object is initialized as an empty object, even though 'tools' is presumably expected to contain tool definitions. This could cause the server capabilities to lack necessary tool configurations, thus potentially impacting functionalities that depend on certain tool setups.

📚 Relevant Docs

  • 'STACK_SECRET_SERVER_KEY' is potentially being included in every request header without checking its existence again here. Although it's checked during initialization, this could lead to security issues as it's exposed in all communications where the header is logged or captured.

📚 Relevant Docs

  • When adding 'use client' directive at the beginning, it doesn't check if file.text already contains the 'use client' directive. This could lead to duplicate 'use client' directives if the file already has one.

📚 Relevant Docs

⚠️ Only 5 files were analyzed due to processing limits.

Need help? Join our Discord for support!
https://discord.gg/qEjHQk64Z9

@madster456 madster456 marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2025 15:28
Copy link
Contributor
@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greptile Summary

This PR introduces a new Stack Companion feature to the dashboard application, adding a collapsible sidebar with documentation, feature requests, and changelog functionality. The implementation includes:

  1. A new StackCompanion component that serves as a fixed right-side panel
  2. Integration with Featurebase for feature request management and changelogs
  3. New API endpoints for handling feature requests
  4. Environment configuration updates to support the new features
  5. UI components for feature request board and changelog display

The changes span both frontend and backend, with proper attention to authentication, state management, and user experience. The implementation follows existing patterns and includes responsive design considerations.

Confidence score: 3 /5

  1. This PR introduces significant new functionality that could impact user experience if not properly tested
  2. Several security concerns exist around XSS vulnerabilities and input validation
  3. The following files need particular attention:
    • changelog-widget.tsx: Usage of dangerouslySetInnerHTML
    • feature-requests/route.tsx: Potential scalability issues with upvote fetching
    • feature-request-board.tsx: Proper error handling needs review

11 files reviewed, 7 comments
Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile

Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
apps/backend/.env (1)

69-69: Past feedback addressed: correct key name and typo fixed

The variable name STACK_FEATUREBASE_API_KEY and “featurebase” spelling match prior suggestions. Thanks for aligning with earlier feedback.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7fc50ed and e90950a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • apps/backend/.env (1 hunks)
  • apps/dashboard/package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/sidebar-layout.tsx (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • apps/dashboard/package.json
  • apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/sidebar-layout.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 dotenv-linter (3.3.0)
apps/backend/.env

[warning] 69-69: [UnorderedKey] The STACK_FEATUREBASE_API_KEY key should go before the STACK_FREESTYLE_API_KEY key


[warning] 69-69: [ValueWithoutQuotes] This value needs to be surrounded in quotes

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
  • GitHub Check: docker
  • GitHub Check: setup-tests
  • GitHub Check: lint_and_build (latest)
  • GitHub Check: restart-dev-and-test
  • GitHub Check: docker
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: claude-review
  • GitHub Check: all-good
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: Security Check
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/backend/.env (1)

69-69: No client-side references to STACK_FEATUREBASE_API_KEY detected

Ripgrep searches for process.env.STACK_FEATUREBASE_API_KEY and any NEXT_PUBLIC_STACK_FEATUREBASE_API_KEY alias returned no matches across the repo. No further changes required—this secret remains server-only.

Copy link
claude bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Claude finished @madster456's task —— View job


I'll analyze this and get back to you.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (1)

23-28: Add timeout and retry logic for API calls

All fetch requests in this file lack timeout configuration and retry logic for transient failures, which could lead to hanging requests or unnecessary failures.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (1)

225-225: Improve fallback name generation

Using the email local part as a fallback name could expose email addresses in the UI if Featurebase displays usernames publicly. Consider using a more generic fallback.

-    name: stackAuthUser.displayName || stackAuthUser.primaryEmail?.split('@')[0] || 'User',
+    name: stackAuthUser.displayName || `User ${stackAuthUser.id.slice(-6)}`,
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e90950a and 318e9b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (2)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/errors.tsx (1)
  • StackAssertionError (69-85)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/env.tsx (1)
  • getEnvVariable (16-58)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
  • GitHub Check: restart-dev-and-test
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: setup-tests
  • GitHub Check: all-good
  • GitHub Check: claude-review
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: docker
  • GitHub Check: lint_and_build (latest)
  • GitHub Check: docker
  • GitHub Check: Security Check

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 318e9b6 and c5859c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/dashboard/package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: lint_and_build (latest)
  • GitHub Check: restart-dev-and-test
  • GitHub Check: docker
  • GitHub Check: setup-tests
  • GitHub Check: all-good
  • GitHub Check: claude-review
  • GitHub Check: docker
  • GitHub Check: Security Check

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
claude bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Claude finished @madster456's task —— View job


I'll analyze this and get back to you.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (2)

92-95: Fix inconsistent error handling pattern

The error handling here suppresses all errors with console.error and returns null, while other similar functions (findFeaturebaseUserById, createFeaturebaseUser, updateFeaturebaseUser) consistently throw StackAssertionError for failures. This creates inconsistent behavior for callers.

Apply consistent error handling:

  } catch (error) {
-    console.error('Error finding Featurebase user by email:', error);
-    return null;
+    if (error instanceof StackAssertionError) {
+      throw error;
+    }
+    throw new StackAssertionError("Failed to find Featurebase user by email", { cause: error });
  }

23-28: Add timeout and retry logic for API calls

All fetch requests lack timeout configuration and retry logic for transient failures. Consider adding these for better resilience in production environments.

Example implementation using AbortController for timeout:

async function fetchWithTimeout(url: string, options: RequestInit, timeoutMs = 10000): Promise<Response> {
  const controller = new AbortController();
  const timeout = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), timeoutMs);
  
  try {
    const response = await fetch(url, {
      ...options,
      signal: controller.signal,
    });
    return response;
  } finally {
    clearTimeout(timeout);
  }
}

Then replace fetch calls:

-    const response = await fetch(`https://do.featurebase.app/v2/organization/identifyUser?id=${stackAuthUserId}`, {
+    const response = await fetchWithTimeout(`https://do.featurebase.app/v2/organization/identifyUser?id=${stackAuthUserId}`, {

Also applies to: 64-64, 103-115, 138-145

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5859c4 and 674e0ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/middleware.ts (0 hunks)
  • packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • docs/middleware.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (2)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/errors.tsx (1)
  • StackAssertionError (69-85)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/env.tsx (1)
  • getEnvVariable (16-58)
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx

[error] 164-164: This code will never be reached ...

... because either this statement will throw an exception, ...

... this statement will return from the function, ...

... this statement will throw an exception, ...

... or this statement will throw an exception beforehand

(lint/correctness/noUnreachable)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: claude-review
  • GitHub Check: all-good
  • GitHub Check: docker
  • GitHub Check: Security Check
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (2)

196-199: Good fix for error handling consistency

The error handling now properly throws a StackAssertionError instead of silently allowing undefined email to be returned. This ensures the function contract is maintained and callers receive consistent error behavior.


224-224: Verify email is never undefined

The function signature promises to return email: string, but if ensuredEmail remains undefined after the fallback email creation fails, this would violate the contract. However, the fix in lines 196-199 properly throws an error, ensuring this function never returns undefined email.

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment
4020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (3)

92-95: Fix inconsistent error handling

The error handling pattern here differs from the other helper functions. This function logs errors and returns null, while findFeaturebaseUserById re-throws StackAssertionError and wraps other errors.

This was already identified in previous reviews. The inconsistent error handling should be fixed to match the pattern used in findFeaturebaseUserById.


102-131: Add try-catch wrapper for network failures

The fetch call is not wrapped in a try-catch block, which means network failures (DNS errors, timeouts, connection issues) will result in unhandled promise rejections rather than consistent StackAssertionError responses.

This issue was already identified in previous reviews. The fetch call should be wrapped in a try-catch block following the same pattern as the other helper functions.


137-165: Add try-catch wrapper for network failures

Similar to createFeaturebaseUser, this function lacks proper error handling for network failures that occur before the response is received.

This issue was already identified in previous reviews. The fetch call should be wrapped in a try-catch block to handle network failures consistently.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (1)

175-178: Consider adding JSDoc parameter documentation

The function has good JSDoc documentation for behavior, but could benefit from parameter documentation for better IDE support.

 /**
  * Get or create a Featurebase user based on Stack Auth user data.
  * This function ensures that:
  * 1. We never change a user's email address on Featurebase
  * 2. We use Stack Auth user ID as the primary identifier
  * 3. We handle email conflicts by using fallback emails
  * 4. We update profile information when needed
+ * 
+ * @param stackAuthUser - The Stack Auth user data to sync
+ * @param options - Optional configuration including API key override
+ * @returns Promise resolving to userId and email of the Featurebase user
  */
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 674e0ed and 31e64f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (2)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/errors.tsx (1)
  • StackAssertionError (69-85)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/env.tsx (1)
  • getEnvVariable (16-58)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: setup-tests
  • GitHub Check: build (22.x)
  • GitHub Check: restart-dev-and-test
  • GitHub Check: lint_and_build (latest)
  • GitHub Check: all-good
  • GitHub Check: docker
  • GitHub Check: docker
  • GitHub Check: claude-review
  • GitHub Check: Security Check
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx (3)

188-199: Good fix for error handling

The error handling in this section has been improved compared to previous versions. The function now properly throws a StackAssertionError when fallback email creation fails, ensuring that callers receive a defined email or an error.


229-241: Validate user creation logic

The logic for creating new users looks correct:

  1. Uses primary email if available, otherwise fallback email
  2. Checks for email conflicts and uses fallback if needed
  3. Generates a reasonable display name from available data

The fallback display name logic using primaryEmail?.split('@')[0] is a good approach.


222-225: Verify ensuredEmail is always defined before return

Please double-check that in every execution path ensuredEmail is either set to a non-empty string or the function exits with an error—there should be no way to hit the return { … email: ensuredEmail } (lines 222–225) with ensuredEmail still undefined. In particular:

  • Review the try { … } catch { … } block around lines 197–199 to ensure any failure in generating or fetching the fallback email always throws.
  • If there’s an if (!ensuredEmail) guard, confirm it either assigns a valid default or throws before reaching the return.
  • Run through edge cases (e.g. existing user has no email and fallback generator returns an empty string) to make sure they’re all caught.

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
claude bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Claude finished @madster456's task —— View job


Code Review for Stack Companion Feature

I've conducted a comprehensive code review of this PR. Here's my analysis plan:

Todo List:

  • Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
  • Review backend API implementation
  • Review frontend component implementation
  • Check security concerns
  • Evaluate performance considerations
  • Assess code quality and best practices
  • Check test coverage
  • Provide final recommendations

Summary

This PR introduces a comprehensive Stack Companion feature with a collapsible sidebar containing documentation, feature requests, changelog, and support sections. The implementation includes both frontend React components and backend API routes for managing feature requests through Featurebase integration.

Major Issues Found

🔴 Critical Security Issues

  1. N+1 Query Problem (apps/backend/src/app/api/latest/internal/feature-requests/route.tsx:71-88)

    • Makes individual API calls for each post to check upvote status
    • Could cause performance degradation and rate limiting with many posts
    • Recommendation: Batch the upvote status checks or modify the Featurebase API integration to return this data in the initial request
  2. XSS Risk in HTML Processing (apps/dashboard/src/components/stack-companion/changelog-widget.tsx)

    • Uses .replace(/<[^>]*>/g, '') for HTML stripping, which is basic
    • Good: Uses htmlToText utility in feature-request-board.tsx
    • Recommendation: Use the htmlToText utility consistently across all components
  3. Hardcoded API URLs (Multiple files)

    • Several URLs are hardcoded instead of using environment variables
    • Makes testing and different environment deployments difficult
    • Recommendation: Extract to environment variables

🟠 Moderate Issues

  1. Missing Error Handling (apps/dashboard/src/components/feedback-form.tsx:32-51)

    • Form submission lacks proper error handling
    • Could result in silent failures
    • Recommendation: Add try-catch blocks and user feedback for errors
  2. Code Duplication

    • Featurebase user management logic duplicated between frontend and backend
    • Error revert logic duplicated in feature-request-board.tsx (lines 168-185 and 189-205)
    • Recommendation: Extract to shared utilities
  3. TypeScript Type Safety Issues

    • Uses any types in multiple places instead of proper type definitions
    • Files affected: changelog-widget.tsx:44,79, feature-request-board.tsx:416,390
    • Recommendation: Define proper TypeScript interfaces

🟡 Minor Issues

  1. Missing Input Validation

    • featureRequestId parameter lacks format validation in upvote route
    • Recommendation: Add regex validation for expected ID format
  2. Inconsistent Error Handling

    • Some catch blocks suppress StackAssertionError exceptions that should propagate
    • Files: packages/stack-shared/src/utils/featurebase.tsx:51-54, 90-93
  3. Performance Optimizations

    • Tooltips have 1-second delay instead of immediate appearance
    • Hardcoded project ID "internal" repeated in multiple places
    • Recommendation: Extract to constants and improve UX timing

Code Quality Assessment

✅ Good Practices

  • Well-structured component hierarchy with clear separation of concerns
  • Proper use of React hooks and state management
  • Good accessibility features (ARIA labels, keyboard navigation)
  • Consistent styling with Tailwind CSS
  • Proper TypeScript usage in most areas
  • Good error boundaries and fallback states
  • Smart route handler pattern in backend APIs

❌ Areas for Improvement

  • Test Coverage: No tests found for the new feature request functionality
  • Documentation: Missing JSDoc comments for complex functions
  • Error Handling: Inconsistent error handling patterns across components
  • Performance: N+1 queries and unnecessary re-renders in some cases

Security Analysis

Concerns Identified:

  1. Data Exposure: User email addresses are sent to external Featurebase API
  2. Input Sanitization: Basic HTML stripping may not catch all XSS vectors
  3. Rate Limiting: No protection against excessive API calls to Featurebase
  4. Authentication: Relies heavily on client-side token handling

Recommendations:

  • Implement server-side rate limiting
  • Use more robust HTML sanitization
  • Audit data sent to external services
  • Add request timeouts and circuit breakers

Performance Considerations

Issues:

  1. N+1 Queries: Major performance bottleneck in feature request loading
  2. Client-Side Rendering: Heavy components could benefit from server-side rendering
  3. Bundle Size: Additional dependencies increase client bundle size

Optimizations:

  • Implement data caching for frequently accessed endpoints
  • Add lazy loading for sidebar components
  • Optimize image loading in changelog widget

Test Coverage

❌ MAJOR ISSUE: No tests found for any of the new functionality:

  • No unit tests for React components
  • No integration tests for API endpoints
  • No E2E tests for user workflows

Critical Recommendation: Add comprehensive test coverage before merging:

# Suggested test structure
/tests/
  ├── components/stack-companion.test.tsx
  ├── components/feature-request-board.test.tsx  
  ├── api/feature-requests.test.ts
  └── e2e/stack-companion-flow.test.ts

Final Recommendations

Before Merging:

  1. Fix N+1 query issue - This is a critical performance problem
  2. Add comprehensive test coverage - Essential for maintainability
  3. Implement proper error handling - Improve user experience
  4. Address security concerns - Especially HTML sanitization and data exposure

Post-Merge Improvements:

  1. Add monitoring and analytics for feature request usage
  2. Implement caching layer for Featurebase API calls
  3. Add comprehensive logging for debugging
  4. Consider implementing offline support for better UX

Code Quality Score: 6.5/10

Strengths: Well-architected, good UX design, proper React patterns
Weaknesses: Security concerns, missing tests, performance issues, error handling gaps

The feature adds significant value but needs security and performance improvements before production deployment.


@madster456 madster456 merged commit 15ac504 into dev Aug 12, 2025
19 checks passed
@madster456 madster456 deleted the feature/stack-companion branch August 12, 2025 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0