8000 [Backport 5.5.x] Context: return lines around symbol match by sourcegraph-release-bot · Pull Request #63788 · sourcegraph/sourcegraph-public-snapshot · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 30, 2024. It is now read-only.

[Backport 5.5.x] Context: return lines around symbol match#63788

Merged
jdpleiness merged 2 commits into5.5.xfrom
backport-63773-to-5.5.x
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

[Backport 5.5.x] Context: return lines around symbol match#63788
jdpleiness merged 2 commits into5.5.xfrom
backport-63773-to-5.5.x

Conversation

@sourcegraph-release-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR fixes an important bug in #62976, where we didn't properly map the
symbol line match to the return type. Instead, we accidentally treated symbol
matches like file matches and returned the start of the file.

Test plan

Add new unit test for symbol match conversion. Extensive manual testing.
Backport 004eb0f from #63773

This PR fixes an important bug in #62976, where we didn't properly map the
symbol line match to the return type. Instead, we accidentally treated symbol
matches like file matches and returned the start of the file.

## Test plan

Add new unit test for symbol match conversion. Extensive manual testing.

(cherry picked from commit 004eb0f)
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Jul 11, 2024
@jtibshirani jtibshirani requested review from a team, Chickensoupwithrice and jdpleiness and removed request for a team and jdpleiness July 11, 2024 16:11
@jtibshirani
Copy link
Contributor

I'd like to get this in for the release next week! I wasn't sure if I needed to backport to do so. I will close this out if it's not necessary.

@jdpleiness jdpleiness self-requested a review July 11, 2024 19:53
@jdpleiness jdpleiness merged commit 308624f into 5.5.x Jul 11, 2024
@jdpleiness jdpleiness deleted the backport-63773-to-5.5.x branch July 11, 2024 20:14
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

0