output: make StreamLines accept string instead of bytes #41
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The main intent is to allow command output to be streamed to
lib/output.Output, e.g.I was originally going to add this to
lib/output, e.g. https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/pull/36594, but I stumbled acrossPendingandoutput.Writer(linked above). The integration is probably neater by changing the interface here - besides, if you're getting data line-by-line then you're probably already thinking in terms of processed data (strings) anyway.Context: experimenting with https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/pull/36556 and thinking we can have each
Actionbe providedpendingfor neater output.pendingimplements only theWriterinterface