8000 [MRG+1] fix biclustering API by amueller · Pull Request #9053 · scikit-learn/scikit-learn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[MRG+1] fix biclustering API #9053

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2017

Conversation

amueller
Copy link
Member
@amueller amueller commented Jun 8, 2017

Fixes #6126
Replaces and closes #6141.

@@ -405,6 +405,10 @@ API changes summary
has been renamed to ``n_components`` and will be removed in version 0.21.
:issue:`8922` by :user:Attractadore

- :class:`cluster.bicluster.SpectralCoClustering` and
:class:`cluster.bicluster.SpectralBiclustering` now accept ``y`` in fit
and return ``self``. :issue:`6126` by `Andreas Müller`_.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this PR has nothing about returning self.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indeed. Besides LGTM

don't mention returning self in whatsnew as that's already fixed in master
@amueller amueller force-pushed the bicluster_api_fix branch from 7d61b56 to c4fa5d7 Compare June 8, 2017 11:58
@amueller
Copy link
Member Author
amueller commented Jun 8, 2017

@vene removed and restricted scope of the PR

@GaelVaroquaux GaelVaroquaux changed the title fix biclustering API [MRG+1] fix biclustering API Jun 8, 2017
@GaelVaroquaux
Copy link
Member

LGTM. +1 for merge

@agramfort agramfort merged commit 22aafe0 into scikit-learn:master Jun 8, 2017
@agramfort
Copy link
Member

thanks @amueller

@vene
Copy link
Member
vene commented Jun 8, 2017

@amueller could the scope of this pr have been any more restricted? 😛

Sundrique pushed a commit to Sundrique/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2017
don't mention returning self in whatsnew as that's already fixed in master
dmohns pushed a commit to dmohns/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2017
don't mention returning self in whatsnew as that's already fixed in master
dmohns pushed a commit to dmohns/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2017
don't mention returning self in whatsnew as that's already fixed in master
NelleV pushed a commit to NelleV/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2017
don't mention returning self in whatsnew as that's already fixed in master
paulha pushed a commit to paulha/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2017
don't mention returning self in whatsnew as that's already fixed in master
AishwaryaRK pushed a commit to AishwaryaRK/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2017
don't mention returning self in whatsnew as that's already fixed in master
maskani-moh pushed a commit to maskani-moh/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2017
don't mention returning self in whatsnew as that's already fixed in master
jwjohnson314 pushed a commit to jwjohnson314/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2017
don't mention returning self in whatsnew as that's already fixed in master
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SpectralBiclustering.fit doesn't return self
4 participants
0