8000 DOC describe scikit-learn-contrib in related projects and contributing docs by jnothman · Pull Request #8440 · scikit-learn/scikit-learn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

DOC describe scikit-learn-contrib in related projects and contributing docs #8440

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 24, 2017

Conversation

jnothman
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #8440 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8440      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.47%   95.47%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files         342      342              
  Lines       60902    60907       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits        58149    58154       +5     
  Misses       2753     2753
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
sklearn/cluster/dbscan_.py 100% <ø> (ø)
sklearn/cluster/tests/test_dbscan.py 100% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6f771d5...797f3fe. Read the comment docs.

@jnothman jnothman changed the title DOC describe scikit-learn-contrib in related projects DOC describe scikit-learn-contrib in related projects and contributing docs Feb 23, 2017
Copy link
Member
@lesteve lesteve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small comments, otherwise LGTM

by deriving a class from ``BaseEstimator``
and optionally the mixin classes in ``sklearn.base``.
E.g., below is a custom classifier.
`scikit-learn-contrib <https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/project-template/blob/master/skltemplate/template.py>`_::
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You removed "For more information on this example see", was that intentional? Now scikit-learn-contrib stand on its own which is a bit weird.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I meant to remove "for more information on this example" because I found it weird. I did not mean to leave the URL there. WDYT?

Copy link
Member
@lesteve lesteve Feb 23, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like the template has some other examples of estimators, maybe you can do:

E.g., below is a custom classifier

>>> import numpy as np
...


For more examples of estimators see the `scikit-learn-contrib template <url>`_

Copy link
Member Author
@jnothman jnothman Feb 24, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

selection tools such as :class:`model_selection.GridSearchCV` and
:class:`pipeline.Pipeline`.

For this to work, you need to implement the interface described below.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure what "described below" actually refers to, can we add a link? I know it was like this before but adding topics as you did makes below even belower if that makes sense ...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about: "Before detailing the required interface below, we describe two ways to achieve the correct interface more easily."

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sounds good

@jnothman
Copy link
Member Author

Changes made, thanks @lesteve

@lesteve
Copy link
Member
lesteve commented Feb 24, 2017

LGTM, merging thanks a lot!

@lesteve lesteve merged commit 067adad into scikit-learn:master Feb 24, 2017
sergeyf pushed a commit to sergeyf/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2017
@Przemo10 Przemo10 mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2017
massich pushed a commit to massich/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2017
Sundrique pushed a commit to Sundrique/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2017
NelleV pushed a commit to NelleV/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2017
paulha pushed a commit to paulha/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2017
maskani-moh pushed a commit to maskani-moh/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2017
lemonlaug pushed a commit to lemonlaug/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0