10000 [MRG+1] Updated _std docstring in StandardScaler to make internal handling of zero values explicit. by joshloyal · Pull Request #4796 · scikit-learn/scikit-learn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[MRG+1] Updated _std docstring in StandardScaler to make internal handling of zero values explicit. #4796

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2015

Conversation

joshloyal
Copy link
Contributor

Fix for Issue #4609

@amueller
Copy link
Member
amueller commented Jun 1, 2015

Thanks. LGTM. Please referene the issue number you are fixing in the PR description. If you put in "Closing #XXXX", github will actually close the issue automatically on merge.

@amueller amueller changed the title Updated _std docstring in StandardScaler to make internal handling of zero values explicit. [MRG] Updated _std docstring in StandardScaler to make internal handling of zero values explicit. Jun 1, 2015
@amueller
Copy link
Member
amueller commented Jun 1, 2015

Closes #4609.

@jnothman jnothman changed the title [MRG] Updated _std docstring in StandardScaler to make internal handling of zero values explicit. [MRG+1] Updated _std docstring in StandardScaler to make internal handling of zero values explicit. Jun 8, 2015
@TomDLT
Copy link
Member
TomDLT commented Jun 10, 2015

Looks good

amueller added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2015
[MRG+1] Updated _std docstring in StandardScaler to make internal handling of zero values explicit.
@amueller amueller merged commit 98ca513 into scikit-learn:master Jun 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0