-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26k
Docs: Add Nvidia RAPIDS #31682
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Docs: Add Nvidia RAPIDS #31682
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the PR, @smith558!
@adrinjalali, just a friendly ping, do you think NVIDIA RAPIDS would be appropriate to include on the "Related Projects" page?
+1 for referencing RAPIDS in that section, but the disclaimer for the scikit-learn-intelex item should be extracted as a new paragraph at the beginning of the "Model throughput" section because it would apply for both projects. |
I'm not sure about this one. Should it not instead be the cuml project? |
Indeed. It is cuML. But cuML is a part of RAPIDS. Not a separate project. |
And intelex is a part of intel, that doesn't mean we refer to intel as a related project 😅 From the perspective of our users, and us, cuML is a separate project, separate repo, separate |
Sorry, the project is literally called RAPIDS, it's the preferred way of the maintainers. When were we discussing the word "Nvidia"? My comment said:
I am happy for you to drop "Nvidia". (Even though I think it makes sense to keep "Nvidia" in it, because it's strictly only for Nvidia chips.)
No, you do. In the docs you literally call |
I'd be okay with including |
Reference Issues/PRs
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Add Nvidia RAPIDS
Any other comments?