-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
DOC: Remove non-relevant comment in fetch_lfw_pairs
documentation
#30871
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the information that the "pairs dataset" corresponds to the "restricted task" in the original publication is actually valuable. I would edit to something similar to:
In the `original paper <https://people.cs.umass.edu/~elm/papers/lfw.pdf>`_
the "pairs" version corresponds to the "restricted task", where
the experimenter should not use the name of a person to infer
the equivalence or non-equivalence of two face images that
are not explicitly given in the training set.
And then I agree that we should remove the comment on not supporting the "unrestricted version", which actually corresponds to the "people" version in my understanding of things.
@ArturoAmorQ Thank you for your feedback! I have added the narrative per your suggestion. |
fetch_lfw_pairs
documentationfetch_lfw_pairs
documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @star1327p! Merging!
Reference Issues/PRs
Related to #30800.
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Remove a comment in
fetch_lfw_pairs
documentation about leaving the "unrestricted' variant unsupported.https://scikit-learn.org/dev/modules/generated/sklearn.datasets.fetch_lfw_pairs.html
The README.txt link does not work, so we rather mention the original paper.
Any other comments?