8000 DOC: Fixing notebook-style formatting on plot_segmentation_toy.py by RenTrieu · Pull Request #23140 · scikit-learn/scikit-learn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

DOC: Fixing notebook-style formatting on plot_segmentation_toy.py #23140

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 27, 2022

Conversation

RenTrieu
Copy link
Contributor

Reference Issues/PRs

Related to issue #22406

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Fixes notebook style by replacing # #### by block splitter # %% in plot_segmentation_toy.py.

Any other comments?

Please let me know if there's anything I should revise and/or add.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Documentation label Apr 14, 2022 < 8000 /div>
Copy link
Contributor
@jsilke jsilke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the PR!

Please let me know if there's anything I should revise and/or add.

In the spirit of your request, I have assembled a list of suggestions that I believe will dramatically improve the format of this example. Please review my suggestions and let me know what you think!

RenTrieu and others added 4 commits April 15, 2022 17:28
Improving clarity of the 4 circles example case

Co-authored-by: Jordan Silke <51223540+jsilke@users.noreply.github.com>
Improving clarity of the plotting code

Co-authored-by: Jordan Silke <51223540+jsilke@users.noreply.github.com>
Improving clarity and adding explanation to the two circles plotting case

Co-authored-by: Jordan Silke <51223540+jsilke@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author
@RenTrieu RenTrieu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello! Thank you for your suggestions. I think they make a lot of sense and improve clarity of the notebook. I will implement and commit these changes.

Copy link
Contributor
@jsilke jsilke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for considering my suggestions. I think what you have here already looks much better than the original example! There are only a couple more changes I would make to this notebook. Please review my followup comments when you have a chance and let me know what you think.

Copy link
Contributor
@jsilke jsilke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thank you for the many improvements @RenTrieu !

@lesteve lesteve added the Quick Review For PRs that are quick to review label Apr 20, 2022
@lesteve lesteve mentioned this pull request Apr 20, 2022
47 tasks
@lesteve
Copy link
Member
lesteve commented Apr 27, 2022
8000

Merging, thanks @RenTrieu for the PR and @jsilke for the review!

@lesteve lesteve merged commit 03fdd02 into scikit-learn:main Apr 27, 2022
jjerphan pushed a commit to jjerphan/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2022
…t-learn#23140)

Co-authored-by: Jordan Silke <51223540+jsilke@users.noreply.github.com>
glemaitre pushed a commit to glemaitre/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request May 19, 2022
…t-learn#23140)

Co-authored-by: Jordan Silke <51223540+jsilke@users.noreply.github.com>
glemaitre pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2022
Co-authored-by: Jordan Silke <51223540+jsilke@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Quick Review For PRs that are quick to review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0