-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26k
[MRG] Updates on the scikit-learn sponsor page #15043
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
I like how this looks. Is it still WIP? one area to improve: I think it's easy to currently misconstrue that the consortium is the primary/only funding source. So a preface might help clarify that several sources will be listed. |
Thanks @jnothman for your answer. |
doc/about.rst
Outdated
`The University of Sydney <https://sydney.edu.au/>`_ funds Joel Nothman since July 2017. | ||
Andreas Müller received a grant to improve scikit-learn from the | ||
`Alfred P. Sloan Foundation <https://sloan.org>`_ . | ||
This grant supports the position of Nicolas Hug and Thomas J. Fan. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@amueller, @NicolasHug, @thomasjpfan could you please check? Thanks!
|
||
The 2011 International Granada sprint was made possible thanks to the support | ||
of the `PSF <https://www.python.org/psf/>`_ and `tinyclues | ||
<https://www.tinyclues.com/>`_. | ||
|
||
Donating to the project |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See also the discussion about NumFocus here #6603
@GaelVaroquaux and Co. (I don't know exactly who I need to ping...) is that still relevant? Who is taking care of that?
Thanks!
Hello everybody: in 2ca0613 I have removed the logos on the homepage and changed the link text in the community section. I have now a concern about the Google search engine (see also #7061), because without any other logos in the homepage its presence ends up in an unjustified Google visibility with respect to other funders. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some comments on the logo layout:
Yes, that's better, thanks!
Any reason this is still WIP?
|
Changed to [MRG] . Someone will answer my questions in the review phase... right? :) |
@cmarmo I also had your intuition at first, but we apparently use WIP only when we're sure it's not in a good state and we're still working on it. You can remove the tag as soon as it's ready for review, and the review is in progress. Writing this up, I realize how vague and undefined it is. |
WIP is more or less equivalent to "do not merge". It means that merging in
the current state would provide something deficient.
|
Summarizing some discussion we had yesterday IRL with @cmarmo @glemaitre and @jeremiedbb :
|
I have refactored the description of the PR to turn it into a tick-able todo list. I think we should keep this PR as WIP as long as not all the boxes are ticked. Some of them just imply making a decision.
But then we have the problem of the order? Maybe oldest support to newest? Or shall we use a bit of javascript to shuffle the order on display? |
Or shall we use a bit of javascript to shuffle the order on display?
I like the idea of shuffling.
|
@ogrisel, I've added all the logos ... I'm not quite sure about the order ... let me know. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks very much @cmarmo!
Actually can you please add a link from the footer logos of the index.html page to the Funding section of the about.html page? |
Done: but I'm really unhappy with the |
Maybe putting the |
You can add a a.sk-landing-funding-link:hover {
text-decoration: none;
} |
Right! Thanks! Done. |
I'm okay to get rid of the sponsors' logos on the homepage. Atm it it unclear that they are there because of sponsorship. |
I like what's happening in about.html |
I agree with you... but I could not persuade @ogrisel ... :) |
Alright, let's remove them from the homepage then. I did not want to change how we acknowledge support unilaterally. |
I'm okay to get rid of the sponsors' logos on the homepage. Atm it it unclear that they are there because of sponsorship.
I agree with you... but I could not persuade @ogrisel ... :)
Yesterday evening, I was thinking that it could get us in trouble with higher ups...
|
What is more trouble: having logos on the homepage or not having logos? |
What is more trouble: having logos on the homepage or not having logos?
Not having logos, I think. At least for us at Inria.
|
Ok then we can re-add them with a short sentence such as: " Scikit-learn development and maintenance is supported by generous sponsors: and we only keep the link to Previously this link was in the "Community" box of the homepage which was probably the source of confusion: |
looks good :) |
Thanks @cmarmo for bearing with the decision process. Here is a screenshot of the current state: I am still +1 for merge :) |
Thank you very much @cmarmo! We can always refine in further PRs if needed. |
This is great! Thank you!
|
Reference Issues/PRs
Closes #14974
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Updates the funding section in the about us page.
TODO
Please, just comment about the content now: css will be fixed once the content well defined.
Thanks for your collaboration.