-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26k
[MRG+1] Fix SGDClassifier never has the attribute "predict_proba" (even with log or modified_huber loss) #12222
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
NicolasHug
merged 14 commits into
scikit-learn:master
from
rebekahkim:moc-predict-proba
Apr 19, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
55d82e8
fix hasattr param
rebekahkim db2c21d
correct spelling + add test
rebekahkim 33f178d
minor format fix
rebekahkim 9099e0e
more test
rebekahkim e0cb97c
fix spacing/typo
rebekahkim 39ae51a
edge case test
rebekahkim fdac883
Merge branch 'master' into moc-predict-proba
rebekahkim 7c0c12a
add cv to grid search
rebekahkim d3a3ec1
fix warnings
rebekahkim 3fdf1dd
more test for code coverage
rebekahkim 173b28d
add documentation
rebekahkim 8e24d17
update doc
rebekahkim 2e5dd2c
Merge branch 'master' into moc-predict-proba
rebekahkim 8828c71
fix error msg
NicolasHug File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to
assert not hasattr(..., 'predict_proba')
before doing this fit, so that the intention of the test is a bit clearer.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean for
multi_target_linear.estimator
, right? Technically, theestimator
still wouldn't havepredict_proba
after fit because the underlying estimator (SGDClassifier with default loss='hinge') doesn't havepredict_proba
. But all estimators inestimators_
here would (after fit, of course).If you mean for the
multi_target_linear
itself, it would havepredict_proba
before and after fit; it just won't be valid (raises ValueError)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jnothman thoughts?