8000 Fixing summary table in the linear model documentation. by markhannel · Pull Request #12220 · scikit-learn/scikit-learn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Fixing summary table in the linear model documentation. #12220

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2018

Conversation

markhannel
Copy link
Contributor

I corrected the formatting of the table summarizing logistic regression "solver" behaviors and penalties in the linear model documentation.

Reference Issues/PRs

The formatting error was suggested in the following document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dgEPcGnbfs6DRs7qtZMkbF6mLP6cywfn46rMFGRmTQg/edit

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

I updated the table formatting to allow two table sections, one for penalties and one for behaviors.

@amueller
Copy link
Member

cool let's wait for circle to build the docs so we can check how it looks!

Copy link
Member
@qinhanmin2014 qinhanmin2014 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @markhannel

In a nutshell, the following table summarizes the penalties supported by each solver:

+------------------------------+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+-----------+------------+
| | **Solvers** |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

solvers won't be in the middle, but I won't be too strict here.

@qinhanmin2014 qinhanmin2014 merged commit e1c3c22 into scikit-learn:master Sep 30, 2018
jnothman pushed a commit to jnothman/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0